Rezoagli Emanuele, Fumagalli Roberto, Bellani Giacomo
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):282. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.62.
Fifty years ago, Ashbaugh and colleagues defined for the first time the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), one among the most challenging clinical condition of the critical care medicine. The scientific community worked over the years to generate a unified definition of ARDS, which saw its revisited version in the Berlin definition, in 2014. Epidemiologic information about ARDS is limited in the era of the new Berlin definition, and wide differences are reported among countries all over the world. Despite decades of study in the field of lung injury, ARDS is still so far under-recognized, with 2 out of 5 cases missed by clinicians. Furthermore, although advances of ventilator strategies in the management of ARDS associated with outcome improvements-such as protective mechanical ventilation, lower driving pressure, higher PEEP levels and prone positioning-ARDS appears to be undertreated and mortality remains elevated up to 40%. In this review, we cover the history that led to the current worldwide accepted Berlin definition of ARDS and we summarize the recent data regarding ARDS epidemiology.
五十年前,阿什baugh及其同事首次定义了急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),这是重症医学中最具挑战性的临床病症之一。多年来,科学界致力于生成ARDS的统一定义,该定义在2014年的柏林定义中得到了重新审视。在新的柏林定义时代,关于ARDS的流行病学信息有限,世界各地的国家报告存在很大差异。尽管在肺损伤领域进行了数十年的研究,但ARDS至今仍未得到充分认识,临床医生漏诊了五分之二的病例。此外,尽管在ARDS管理中通气策略的进步与改善预后相关,如保护性机械通气、更低的驱动压力、更高的呼气末正压水平和俯卧位通气,但ARDS似乎仍未得到充分治疗,死亡率仍高达40%。在这篇综述中,我们涵盖了导致目前全球公认的ARDS柏林定义的历史,并总结了关于ARDS流行病学的最新数据。