Huang Alison R, Rebok George W, Swenor Bonnielin K, Deal Jennifer A
Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA.
Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2024 Apr 9;16(2):e12537. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12537. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
Cognitive training is delivered visually and aurally. It is unknown whether self-reported sensory difficulty modifies the effects of cognitive training on cognition.
Participants ( = 2788) in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study were randomized to training in memory, reasoning, speed of processing, or control. Differences in the 10-year effect of cognitive training on cognition by self-reported vision and hearing difficulty were assessed using linear mixed effect models.
Benefit (intervention vs. control) of reasoning training was smaller among participants with versus without vision difficulty (difficulty: -0.25, 95% confidence interval: [-0.88, 0.39], no difficulty: 0.58 [0.28, 0.89]). Benefit of memory training was greater for participants with versus without hearing difficulty (difficulty: 0.17 [-0.37, 0.72], no difficulty: -0.20 [-0.65, 0.24]).
Older adults with sensory loss have increased risk for cognitive decline; benefits of cognitive training may be greater for these individuals. Sensory loss should be considered in training design.
Memory training was more beneficial for participants with hearing loss.Participants with vision difficulties did not benefit as much from reasoning training.Low accessibility in design and learned compensation strategies may contribute.Consideration of sensory impairment in study design is needed.Inclusion of older adults with sensory impairment in cognitive training is needed.
认知训练通过视觉和听觉进行。自我报告的感觉困难是否会改变认知训练对认知的影响尚不清楚。
“独立和活力老年人高级认知训练研究”中的参与者(n = 2788)被随机分配到记忆、推理、处理速度训练组或对照组。使用线性混合效应模型评估自我报告的视力和听力困难对认知训练10年认知效果的差异。
有视力困难的参与者与无视力困难的参与者相比,推理训练的益处(干预组与对照组)较小(有困难:-0.25,95%置信区间:[-0.88, 0.39],无困难:0.58 [0.28, 0.89])。有听力困难的参与者与无听力困难的参与者相比,记忆训练的益处更大(有困难:0.17 [-0.37, 0.72],无困难:-0.20 [-0.65, 0.24])。
有感觉丧失的老年人认知能力下降的风险增加;认知训练对这些个体的益处可能更大。在训练设计中应考虑感觉丧失。
记忆训练对听力损失的参与者更有益。有视力困难的参与者从推理训练中获益不多。设计中的低可及性和习得的补偿策略可能起作用。研究设计中需要考虑感觉障碍。认知训练中需要纳入有感觉障碍的老年人。