Brown P
Med J Aust. 1979 Jul 28;2(2):96-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1979.tb112743.x.
Twenty-two adult patients with active endoscopically proven reflux oesophagitis entered a double-blind trial of treatment with either cimetidine (1 g/day) or placebo. A repeat endoscopy was carried out at eight weeks after the beginning of treatment on 19 of the patients. The mucosa appeared macroscopically normal at eight weeks in 81.8% of the cimetidine-treated patients, while 90% of patients were described histologically as having a normal or unremarkable mucosa. The results in placebo-treated patients were 55.6% and 44.4% respectively. The cimetidine-treated patients consumed significantly less antacids than the placebo-treated patients, and the over all assessment of their well-being was significantly better (90.9% patient satisfaction with treatment in the cimetidine group compared to 18.2% in the placebo group). Two patients in the placebo group did not complete the trial due to continuing severity of their symptoms, while none in the cimetidine group felt that their condition had remained static or was worse.
22例经内镜检查确诊为活动性反流性食管炎的成年患者进入一项双盲试验,接受西咪替丁(1克/天)或安慰剂治疗。19例患者在治疗开始8周后进行了重复内镜检查。在接受西咪替丁治疗的患者中,81.8%在8周时黏膜宏观上看起来正常,而90%的患者组织学上被描述为黏膜正常或无异常。安慰剂治疗患者的相应结果分别为55.6%和44.4%。接受西咪替丁治疗的患者服用的抗酸剂明显少于接受安慰剂治疗的患者,并且他们总体健康状况的评估明显更好(西咪替丁组90.9%的患者对治疗满意,而安慰剂组为18.2%)。安慰剂组有2例患者因症状持续严重而未完成试验,而西咪替丁组没有患者觉得自己的病情保持不变或恶化。