• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种可访问的基于网络的调查,用于监测 COVID-19 大流行期间轻度智力障碍或低识字技能人群的心理健康:比较数据分析。

An Accessible Web-Based Survey to Monitor the Mental Health of People With Mild Intellectual Disability or Low Literacy Skills During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Data Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Academic Collaborative Intellectual Disability and Health - Sterker op Eigen Benen (SOEB), Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 30;10:e44827. doi: 10.2196/44827.

DOI:10.2196/44827
PMID:38607229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11176870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures affected the mental health of all populations. Particular subgroups are underrepresented in mainstream surveys because they are hard to reach, and study measurements are not adapted to their skills. These subgroups include people with lower cognitive and literacy skills, such as people with mild intellectual disability (MID), who were considered vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic given their low socioeconomic status, small social networks, increased risks of health problems, and difficulties understanding health-related information.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among people with MID or low literacy skills compared with those predominantly represented in national surveys.

METHODS

A repeated cross-sectional study of people with MID or low literacy skills and a general population sample was conducted in the Netherlands. An easy-read web-based survey was co-designed with, and tested among, people with MID or low literacy skills and conducted in 3 rounds within 1 year of the COVID-19 pandemic (T1: November to December 2020, T2: March to April 2021, and T3: September to October 2021). The survey contained questions about demographics and 6 aspects of mental health: feeling happy, feeling energized, feeling stressed, worry, feeling lonely, and sleeping problems.

RESULTS

Our adapted survey and recruitment procedure enabled 1059 persons with MID or low literacy skills to participate (T1: n=412, 38.9%; T2: n=351, 33.1%; and T3: n=296, 28%). They were significantly younger, had a lower level of education, and more often than not were born outside the Netherlands compared to the general population sample (P<.001). Approximately half of them (604/1059, 57.03%) received professional care. They displayed poorer mental health scores than the general population sample. The percentages of people with MID or low literacy skills who reported more negative feelings in T1 ranged from 20.6% (85/412) reporting feeling lonely often or almost always to 57.8% (238/412) reporting feeling happy almost never or sometimes. The general population sample's percentages were 5.4% (160/2930) and 32.2% (941/2918), respectively. Although scores improved over time in both populations, the disproportional effects remained.

CONCLUSIONS

General COVID-19-related restrictions for the entire Dutch population affected people with MID or low literacy skills more negatively than the general population. Our study underscores the relevance of including these subpopulations in public health research because they are often overlooked in regular health data. An accessible web-based survey particularly targeted at this population enabled us to do so, and we reached a group of respondents significantly different from regular survey participants. This survey's results provided insights into the health of people with MID or low literacy skills and gained knowledge to be used by care organizations and policy makers to reduce health disparities during a pandemic and in general.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/11176870/d763bfd236f2/publichealth_v10i1e44827_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/11176870/81673546d228/publichealth_v10i1e44827_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/11176870/d763bfd236f2/publichealth_v10i1e44827_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/11176870/81673546d228/publichealth_v10i1e44827_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/11176870/d763bfd236f2/publichealth_v10i1e44827_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行及相关防控措施影响了所有人群的心理健康。特定亚组在主流调查中代表性不足,因为这些亚组难以接触到,且研究测量方法不适应他们的能力。这些亚组包括认知和读写能力较低的人群,例如轻度智力障碍(MID)患者,他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间被认为是弱势群体,因为他们社会经济地位较低、社交网络较小、健康问题风险增加以及难以理解与健康相关的信息。

目的

本研究旨在调查 COVID-19 大流行对 MID 患者或低读写能力人群心理健康的影响,这些人群与主要出现在全国性调查中的人群相比处于劣势地位。

方法

在荷兰,对 MID 患者或低读写能力人群和一般人群样本进行了一项重复的横断面研究。采用易于阅读的网络调查,与 MID 患者或低读写能力人群共同设计并进行了测试,并在 COVID-19 大流行后的 1 年内进行了 3 轮调查(T1:2020 年 11 月至 12 月;T2:2021 年 3 月至 4 月;T3:2021 年 9 月至 10 月)。调查包含了关于人口统计学和 6 个心理健康方面的问题:感到快乐、感到精力充沛、感到有压力、担忧、感到孤独和睡眠问题。

结果

我们的适应性调查和招募程序使 1059 名 MID 患者或低读写能力人群参与其中(T1:n=412,38.9%;T2:n=351,33.1%;T3:n=296,28%)。与一般人群样本相比,他们的年龄明显更小,受教育程度更低,且多数人(T1:604/1059,57.03%)出生在荷兰以外的国家。他们的心理健康评分明显比一般人群样本差。在 T1 中,有 MID 患者或低读写能力人群报告有较多负面情绪的比例为 20.6%(85/412)报告经常或几乎总是感到孤独,到 57.8%(238/412)报告几乎从未或有时感到快乐。一般人群样本的比例分别为 5.4%(160/2930)和 32.2%(941/2918)。尽管两个群体的分数都随着时间的推移有所提高,但不成比例的影响仍然存在。

结论

针对荷兰全体人口的一般 COVID-19 相关限制对 MID 患者或低读写能力人群的负面影响大于一般人群。我们的研究强调了将这些亚人群纳入公共卫生研究的相关性,因为他们在常规健康数据中经常被忽视。一项针对该人群的可及性网络调查使我们能够做到这一点,我们接触到了一群与常规调查参与者明显不同的受访者。该调查的结果提供了对 MID 患者或低读写能力人群健康状况的深入了解,并为护理组织和政策制定者提供了知识,以减少大流行期间和总体上的健康差距。

相似文献

1
An Accessible Web-Based Survey to Monitor the Mental Health of People With Mild Intellectual Disability or Low Literacy Skills During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Data Analysis.一种可访问的基于网络的调查,用于监测 COVID-19 大流行期间轻度智力障碍或低识字技能人群的心理健康:比较数据分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 30;10:e44827. doi: 10.2196/44827.
2
eHealth Literacy and Web-Based Health Information-Seeking Behaviors on COVID-19 in Japan: Internet-Based Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养与日本 COVID-19 期间的网络健康信息搜索行为:基于互联网的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 11;26:e57842. doi: 10.2196/57842.
3
All-cause and cause-specific mortality among people with and without intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a population-based cohort study.在荷兰 COVID-19 大流行期间,有和没有智力障碍的人群的全因死亡率和病因特异性死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 May;8(5):e356-e363. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00062-2. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
4
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
5
Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 related stress and media consumption with schizotypy, depression, and anxiety in cross-sectional surveys repeated throughout the pandemic in Germany and the UK.调查德国和英国在整个大流行期间通过横断面调查重复进行的 COVID-19 相关压力和媒体消费与精神分裂症倾向、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Elife. 2022 Jul 4;11:e75893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75893.
6
Health literacy and disparities in COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours in Australia.澳大利亚新冠疫情相关知识、态度、信念及行为方面的健康素养与差异
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Dec 9;30(4):30342012. doi: 10.17061/phrp30342012.
7
Accessibility of eHealth Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among People With and People Without Impairment: Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey.新冠疫情之前及期间有身体损伤者和无身体损伤者对电子健康的可及性:重复横断面调查
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Mar 28;11:e64707. doi: 10.2196/64707.
8
Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19-Related Internet Uses and Outcomes Among the General Population.大流行期间的数字不平等:普通人群中与COVID-19相关的互联网使用情况及结果差异的定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e20073. doi: 10.2196/20073.
9
General Mental Health, Loneliness, and Life Satisfaction in the Context of COVID-19 Policies: A 2-Year Cohort Study in the Netherlands, April 2020-January 2022.在 COVID-19 政策背景下的一般心理健康、孤独感和生活满意度:2020 年 4 月至 2022 年 1 月荷兰的一项为期 2 年的队列研究。
Public Health Rep. 2023 Sep-Oct;138(5):812-821. doi: 10.1177/00333549231176000. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
10
Digital Health Literacy and Web-Based Information-Seeking Behaviors of University Students in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠疫情期间德国大学生的数字健康素养和基于网络的信息搜索行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 15;23(1):e24097. doi: 10.2196/24097.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging underrepresented populations in public health monitoring: strategies for people with mild intellectual disability or low literacy skills.让代表性不足的人群参与公共卫生监测:针对轻度智力残疾或低识字技能人群的策略。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 14;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02578-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Health equity for people with intellectual and developmental disability requires vast improvements to data collection: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.智障和发育障碍人群的健康公平需要在数据收集方面进行重大改进:从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的教训。
Disabil Health J. 2024 Jan;17(1):101539. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101539. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
2
Cohort profile: The Corona Behavioral Unit cohort, a longitudinal mixed-methods study on COVID-19-related behavior, well-being and policy support in the Netherlands.队列资料简介:Corona Behavioral Unit 队列,这是一项在荷兰进行的关于 COVID-19 相关行为、幸福感和政策支持的纵向混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 31;18(7):e0289294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289294. eCollection 2023.
3
Long-term social restrictions and lack of work activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on the daily lives of people with intellectual disabilities.
长期的社会限制和 COVID-19 大流行期间缺乏工作活动:对智障人士日常生活的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Dec;45(24):4122-4132. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2147227. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life among relatives of individuals with intellectual disabilities: A longitudinal study.**新冠疫情对智力障碍患者亲属生活质量的影响:一项纵向研究。**
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jan;36(1):68-77. doi: 10.1111/jar.13035. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
A thematic analysis into the experiences of people with a mild intellectual disability during the COVID-19 lockdown period.一项关于轻度智力残疾者在新冠疫情封锁期间经历的主题分析。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2020 Oct 5;68(4):578-582. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2020.1827214. eCollection 2022.
6
The mental health and well-being of adults with intellectual disability during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.新冠疫情期间成年智力残疾者的心理健康与福祉:一项叙述性综述
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2022 Mar;19(1):35-47. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12412. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
7
Co-creating a Theory of Change to advance COVID-19 testing and vaccine uptake in underserved communities.共同创建一个变革理论,以促进服务不足社区的 COVID-19 检测和疫苗接种。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):149-157. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13910. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
8
The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on older adults with an intellectual disability during the first wave of the pandemic in Ireland.2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对爱尔兰第一波疫情期间智障老年人的影响。
HRB Open Res. 2021 Dec 13;4:93. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13238.2. eCollection 2021.
9
Conceptualizing Vulnerability for Health Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Associated Measures in Utrecht and Zeist: A Concept Map.概念化 COVID-19 大流行对健康影响的脆弱性和乌得勒支和宰斯特的相关措施:概念图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;18(22):12163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212163.
10
Invisible populations: Who is missing from research in intellectual disability?隐形人群:智力残疾研究中遗漏了谁?
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Dec;119:104117. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104117. Epub 2021 Nov 1.