Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Centre for Networks & Enterprise, Edinburgh Business School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301804. eCollection 2024.
In this work we seek to enhance the frameworks practitioners in asset management and wealth management may adopt to asses how different screening rules may influence the diversification benefits of portfolios. The problem arises naturally in the area of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) based investing practices as practitioners often need to select subsets of the total available assets based on some ESG screening rule. Once a screening rule is identified, one constructs a dynamic portfolio which is usually compared with another dynamic portfolio to check if it satisfies or outperforms the risk and return profile set by the company. Our study proposes a novel method that tackles the problem of comparing diversification benefits of portfolios constructed under different screening rules. Each screening rule produces a sequence of graphs, where the nodes are assets and edges are partial correlations. To compare the diversification benefits of screening rules, we propose to compare the obtained graph sequences. The method proposed is based on a machine learning hypothesis testing framework called the kernel two-sample test whose objective is to determine whether the graphs come from the same distribution. If they come from the same distribution, then the risk and return profiles should be the same. The fact that the sample data points are graphs means that one needs to use graph testing frameworks. The problem is natural for kernel two-sample testing as one can use so-called graph kernels to work with samples of graphs. The null hypothesis of the two-sample graph kernel test is that the graph sequences were generated from the same distribution, while the alternative is that the distributions are different. A failure to reject the null hypothesis would indicate that ESG screening does not affect diversification while rejection would indicate that ESG screening does have an effect. The article describes the graph kernel two-sample testing framework, and further provides a brief overview of different graph kernels. We then demonstrate the power of the graph two-sample testing framework under different realistic scenarios. Finally, the proposed methodology is applied to data within the SnP500 to demonstrate the workflow one can use in asset management to test for structural differences in diversification of portfolios under different ESG screening rules.
在这项工作中,我们旨在增强资产管理和财富管理从业者可能采用的框架,以评估不同的筛选规则如何影响投资组合的多元化收益。这个问题在基于环境、社会和治理(ESG)的投资实践中自然出现,因为从业者通常需要根据某些 ESG 筛选规则选择总可用资产的子集。一旦确定了筛选规则,就可以构建一个动态投资组合,通常将其与另一个动态投资组合进行比较,以检查它是否满足或超过公司设定的风险和回报状况。我们的研究提出了一种新方法,可以解决根据不同筛选规则构建的投资组合多元化收益的比较问题。每个筛选规则都会生成一系列图形,其中节点是资产,边是部分相关系数。为了比较筛选规则的多元化收益,我们建议比较获得的图形序列。所提出的方法基于一种称为核双样本检验的机器学习假设检验框架,其目标是确定图形是否来自同一分布。如果它们来自同一分布,则风险和回报状况应该相同。由于样本数据点是图形,因此需要使用图形测试框架。对于核双样本测试,这是一个自然问题,因为可以使用所谓的图形核来处理图形样本。双样本图形核检验的零假设是图形序列是从同一分布生成的,而替代假设是分布不同。如果不能拒绝零假设,则表示 ESG 筛选不会影响多元化,而拒绝则表示 ESG 筛选确实有影响。本文描述了图形核双样本检验框架,并进一步简要介绍了不同的图形核。然后,我们在不同的现实场景下展示了图形双样本检验框架的强大功能。最后,将所提出的方法应用于 SnP500 中的数据,以演示从业者在资产管理中用于测试不同 ESG 筛选规则下投资组合多元化的结构差异的工作流程。