Ullah Asad, Gao Danmei, Wu Fengzhi
Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Front Microbiol. 2024 Mar 26;15:1183024. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1183024. eCollection 2024.
Plants engage in a variety of interactions, including sharing nutrients through common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs), which are facilitated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). These networks can promote the establishment, growth, and distribution of limited nutrients that are important for plant growth, which in turn benefits the entire network of plants. Interactions between plants and microbes in the rhizosphere are complex and can either be socialist or capitalist in nature, and the knowledge of these interactions is equally important for the progress of sustainable agricultural practice. In the socialist network, resources are distributed more evenly, providing benefits for all connected plants, such as symbiosis. For example, direct or indirect transfer of nutrients to plants, direct stimulation of growth through phytohormones, antagonism toward pathogenic microorganisms, and mitigation of stresses. For the capitalist network, AMF would be privately controlled for the profit of certain groups of plants, hence increasing competition between connected plants. Such plant interactions invading by microbes act as saprophytic and cause necrotrophy in the colonizing plants. In the first case, an excess of the nutritional resources may be donated to the receiver plants by direct transfer. In the second case, an unequal distribution of resources occurs, which certainly favor individual groups and increases competition between interactions. This largely depends on which of these responses is predominant ("socialist" or "capitalist") at the moment plants are connected. Therefore, some plant species might benefit from CMNs more than others, depending on the fungal species and plant species involved in the association. Nevertheless, benefits and disadvantages from the interactions between the connected plants are hard to distinguish in nature once most of the plants are colonized simultaneously by multiple fungal species, each with its own cost-benefits. Classifying plant-microbe interactions based on their habitat specificity, such as their presence on leaf surfaces (phyllospheric), within plant tissues (endophytic), on root surfaces (rhizospheric), or as surface-dwelling organisms (epiphytic), helps to highlight the dense and intricate connections between plants and microbes that occur both above and below ground. In these complex relationships, microbes often engage in mutualistic interactions where both parties derive mutual benefits, exemplifying the socialistic or capitalistic nature of these interactions. This review discusses the ubiquity, functioning, and management interventions of different types of plant-plant and plant-microbe interactions in CMNs, and how they promote plant growth and address environmental challenges for sustainable agriculture.
植物会进行多种相互作用,包括通过丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)促进形成的共同菌根网络(CMN)来共享养分。这些网络可以促进对植物生长至关重要的有限养分的建立、生长和分配,进而使整个植物网络受益。根际中植物与微生物之间的相互作用很复杂,本质上既可以是互利共生的,也可以是竞争的,而了解这些相互作用对于可持续农业实践的发展同样重要。在互利共生网络中,资源分配更为均匀,为所有相连的植物带来益处,比如共生。例如,养分直接或间接转移到植物,通过植物激素直接刺激生长,对抗病原微生物以及缓解胁迫。对于竞争网络而言,AMF会被某些植物群体私自控制以获取利益,从而加剧相连植物之间的竞争。这种被微生物入侵的植物相互作用表现为腐生,并在定殖植物中导致坏死营养。在第一种情况下,过量的营养资源可能通过直接转移捐赠给受体植物。在第二种情况下,会出现资源分配不均,这肯定有利于个别群体并加剧相互作用之间的竞争。这在很大程度上取决于在植物相连时这些反应(“互利共生”或“竞争”)中哪种占主导。因此,一些植物物种可能比其他物种从CMN中受益更多,这取决于参与共生的真菌物种和植物物种。然而,一旦大多数植物同时被多种真菌物种定殖,每种真菌都有其自身的成本效益,那么在自然界中相连植物之间相互作用的利弊就很难区分了。根据它们的栖息地特异性对植物 - 微生物相互作用进行分类,例如它们在叶片表面(叶际)、植物组织内(内生)、根表面(根际)的存在情况,或者作为表面栖息生物(附生),有助于突出植物与微生物之间在地上和地下发生的密集而复杂的联系。在这些复杂关系中,微生物通常参与互利共生的相互作用,双方都能从中获得互利,体现了这些相互作用的互利共生或竞争本质。本综述讨论了CMN中不同类型的植物 - 植物和植物 - 微生物相互作用的普遍性、功能和管理干预措施,以及它们如何促进植物生长并应对可持续农业的环境挑战。