Research Domain IV, Research Domain IV, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Institute of Physics, Potsdam University, Potsdam, Germany.
Nature. 2024 Apr;628(8008):551-557. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07219-0. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
Global projections of macroeconomic climate-change damages typically consider impacts from average annual and national temperatures over long time horizons. Here we use recent empirical findings from more than 1,600 regions worldwide over the past 40 years to project sub-national damages from temperature and precipitation, including daily variability and extremes. Using an empirical approach that provides a robust lower bound on the persistence of impacts on economic growth, we find that the world economy is committed to an income reduction of 19% within the next 26 years independent of future emission choices (relative to a baseline without climate impacts, likely range of 11-29% accounting for physical climate and empirical uncertainty). These damages already outweigh the mitigation costs required to limit global warming to 2 °C by sixfold over this near-term time frame and thereafter diverge strongly dependent on emission choices. Committed damages arise predominantly through changes in average temperature, but accounting for further climatic components raises estimates by approximately 50% and leads to stronger regional heterogeneity. Committed losses are projected for all regions except those at very high latitudes, at which reductions in temperature variability bring benefits. The largest losses are committed at lower latitudes in regions with lower cumulative historical emissions and lower present-day income.
全球宏观经济气候变化损害预估通常考虑长时期内的年均气温和全国气温的影响。在这里,我们利用过去 40 年来全球 1600 多个地区的最新实证发现,预估了温度和降水(包括日变化和极值)对经济的次国家级损害。我们采用了一种经验主义方法,为经济增长影响的持久性提供了一个稳健的下限,结果发现,无论未来的排放选择如何,世界经济在未来 26 年内的收入都将减少 19%(相对于没有气候影响的基准线,气候变化的物理影响和经验不确定性的可能范围在 11%至 29%之间)。这些损害已经超过了在这一近期内将全球变暖限制在 2°C 所需的减排成本的六倍,此后,这些损害将随着排放选择的不同而产生强烈分歧。所承诺的损害主要是由于平均温度的变化,但考虑到进一步的气候因素,估计值将增加约 50%,并导致更强的区域异质性。除了极高纬度地区外,所有地区都有可能出现损失,这些地区的温度变化减少带来了好处。在排放历史累计较低且当前收入较低的低纬度地区,承诺的损失最大。