Suppr超能文献

YouTube 作为扁桃体切除术信息资源的质量评估。

A quality assessment of YouTube as an information resource for tonsillectomy.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.

Department of Otolaryngology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 May;180:111955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111955. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Online resources are increasingly being utilised by patients to guide their clinical decision making, as an alternative or supplement to the traditional clinical-patient relationship. YouTube is an online repository of user and community generated videos, which is one of the most popular websites globally. We undertook a study to examine the quality of information presented in YouTube videos related to tonsillectomy.

METHODS

We completed a systematic search of YouTube in May 2023 and identified 88 videos for inclusion in our study. Videos were published in the English language, focussing on tonsillectomy and tonsillectomy recovery, and were greater than 2 min in length. We recorded video quality metrics and two authors independently analysed the quality of information using three validated quality assessment tools described in the literature including the modified DISCERN, Global Quality Score, and the JAMA Benchmark Criteria.

RESULTS

The overall quality of the information was low with mean quality scores of Modified DISCERN (1.8 ± 1.3), GQS (2.6 ± 1.2), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.6 ± 0.7). Information published by medical sources including medical professionals, healthcare organisations, and medical education channels scored significantly higher compared to non-medical sources across all quality measures and were of moderate overall quality and usefulness: Modified DISCERN (2.5 ± 1.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.9, z = -6.0, p < 0.001), GQS (3.2 ± 1.0 vs 1.7 ± 0.9, z = -5.7, p < 0.001), and JAMA (1.9 ± 0.8 vs 1.1 ± 0.3, z = -5.2, p < 0.001). Videos published during or after 2018 scored higher on Modified DISCERN (z = -3.2,p = 0.001) but not on GQS or JAMA. Video quality metrics such as total view count, likes, and comments, and channel subscriber count, did not correlate with higher video quality. However, amongst videos published by authoritative medical sources, total view count correlated positively with higher Modified DISCERN quality scores (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

The overall quality and usefulness of YouTube videos on tonsillectomy is of low quality, but information published by authoritative medical sources score significantly higher. Clinicians should be mindful of increasing use of online information sources such as YouTube when counselling patients. Further research is needed in the medical community to create engaging, high-quality content to provide guidance for patients.

摘要

目的

患者越来越多地利用在线资源来指导他们的临床决策,作为传统临床-患者关系的替代或补充。YouTube 是一个用户和社区生成视频的在线存储库,是全球最受欢迎的网站之一。我们进行了一项研究,以检查与扁桃体切除术相关的 YouTube 视频中呈现的信息质量。

方法

我们于 2023 年 5 月在 YouTube 上进行了系统搜索,确定了 88 个视频纳入我们的研究。视频以英语发布,专注于扁桃体切除术和扁桃体切除术恢复,且长度大于 2 分钟。我们记录了视频质量指标,两位作者使用文献中描述的三种经过验证的质量评估工具(改良 DISCERN、全球质量评分和 JAMA 基准标准)独立分析了信息质量。

结果

信息的整体质量较低,改良 DISCERN 的平均质量评分(1.8±1.3)、GQS(2.6±1.2)和 JAMA 基准标准(1.6±0.7)。与非医疗来源相比,来自医疗来源(包括医疗专业人员、医疗保健组织和医学教育渠道)的信息在所有质量指标上的得分都明显更高,且整体质量和有用性为中等:改良 DISCERN(2.5±1.1 与 0.8±0.9,z=-6.0,p<0.001)、GQS(3.2±1.0 与 1.7±0.9,z=-5.7,p<0.001)和 JAMA(1.9±0.8 与 1.1±0.3,z=-5.2,p<0.001)。在 2018 年期间或之后发布的视频在改良 DISCERN 上的得分更高(z=-3.2,p=0.001),但在 GQS 或 JAMA 上的得分没有更高。视频质量指标,如总观看次数、点赞数和评论数以及频道订阅者数,与更高的视频质量无关。然而,在权威医疗来源发布的视频中,总观看次数与更高的改良 DISCERN 质量评分呈正相关(p=0.037)。

结论

扁桃体切除术的 YouTube 视频的整体质量和有用性较低,但来自权威医疗来源的信息得分显著更高。当为患者提供咨询时,临床医生应该注意在线信息来源(如 YouTube)的使用日益增加。医疗界需要进一步研究,以创建有吸引力、高质量的内容,为患者提供指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验