• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你根本就不好笑:一种衡量领导力中幽默失败的量表的开发与验证。

You are simply not funny: Development and validation of a scale to measure failed humor in leadership.

作者信息

Pundt Alexander, Kutzner Juana, Haberland Katarina, Algner Mona, Lorenz Timo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin (MSB), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:929988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929988. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929988
PMID:35936334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9355378/
Abstract

Research has recently established the notion that humor in leadership contributes to the development of a positive professional relationship between leaders and followers. This relationship has been supposed to be the core mechanism which humor in leadership unfolds its effects on work attitudes and behaviors. However, research has neglected the option that humor used by leaders might fail to amuse their followers. In this study, we investigate the role of failed humor for the relationship between leader and follower. More concretely, we develop a new scale for measuring failed humor in leadership and demonstrate its factorial and criterion-related validity. Using an automated item selection algorithm, we optimized the newly developed scale and derived a well-fitting six-item scale out of a pool of 12 items. In a study based on a sample of 385 employees, we were able to show that our newly developed scale is factorially valid. Moreover, we showed a negative correlation between failed humor and leader-member exchange. Furthermore, we showed incremental validity of failed humor in that failed humor predicted variance in leader-member exchange beyond well-established humor constructs such as affiliative and aggressive humor. Our study contributes to the development of the field of humor in leadership and opens up new options for further inquiry. Moreover, our study demonstrates the use of automated item selection algorithms in the applied field.

摘要

最近的研究确立了这样一种观念,即领导风格中的幽默有助于领导者与下属之间建立积极的职业关系。这种关系被认为是领导风格中的幽默对工作态度和行为产生影响的核心机制。然而,研究忽略了领导者所使用的幽默可能无法逗笑下属这一情况。在本研究中,我们调查了失败的幽默在领导者与下属关系中所起的作用。更具体地说,我们开发了一种新的量表来衡量领导风格中失败的幽默,并证明了它的因子效度和与标准相关的效度。我们使用自动项目选择算法对新开发的量表进行了优化,从12个项目中得出了一个拟合良好的六项量表。在一项基于385名员工样本的研究中,我们能够证明我们新开发的量表具有因子效度。此外,我们发现失败的幽默与领导成员交换之间存在负相关。此外,我们还证明了失败的幽默具有增量效度,即失败的幽默能够预测领导成员交换中的变异,超出了诸如亲和型幽默和攻击型幽默等已确立的幽默构念所能解释的范围。我们的研究有助于领导风格中幽默领域的发展,并为进一步探究开辟了新的途径。此外,我们的研究展示了自动项目选择算法在应用领域的使用。

相似文献

1
You are simply not funny: Development and validation of a scale to measure failed humor in leadership.你根本就不好笑:一种衡量领导力中幽默失败的量表的开发与验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:929988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929988. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and validation of the adaptive leadership behavior scale (ALBS).适应性领导行为量表(ALBS)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1149371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149371. eCollection 2023.
3
The Perceived Leadership Communication Questionnaire (PLCQ): Development and Validation.感知领导力沟通问卷(PLCQ):编制与验证
J Psychol. 2015 Jan-Apr;149(1-2):175-92. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.864251. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
4
Leader humor: A double-edged sword.领导幽默:一把双刃剑。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Dec;54:101698. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101698. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
5
Humor in leadership and employee creative and innovative behavior.领导中的幽默与员工的创造性和创新行为。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Feb;55:101723. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101723. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Leader Humor and Followers' Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Leader Machiavellianism.领导者幽默与下属的变革导向型组织公民行为:领导者马基雅维利主义的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;12(2):22. doi: 10.3390/bs12020022.
7
Signaling trustworthiness: The effect of leader humor on feedback-seeking behavior.传递信任感:领导幽默对寻求反馈行为的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2020;160(2):170-189. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1620161. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations.元分析和初步研究组织中领导行为评价中追随者的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):70-106. doi: 10.1037/apl0000345. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
When Your Boss Is Under Pressure: On the Relationships Between Leadership Inconsistency, Leader and Follower Strain.当你的老板面临压力时:论领导不一致性、领导者与下属压力之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 27;13:816258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816258. eCollection 2022.
10
From self-defeating to other defeating: Examining the effects of leader procrastination on follower work outcomes.从自我挫败到他人挫败:探究领导者拖延对下属工作成果的影响。
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2018 Jun;91(2):430-439. doi: 10.1111/joop.12205. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Bringing back psychological empowerment in empowerment-oriented leadership: the development of the Psychological Empowerment Leadership Scale (PELS).在以赋权为导向的领导中重拾心理赋权:心理赋权领导量表(PELS)的开发。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1539085. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1539085. eCollection 2025.
2
Play-mirth theory: a cognitive appraisal theory of humor.游戏-欢笑理论:一种幽默的认知评价理论。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 6;15:1473742. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473742. eCollection 2024.
3
Humor in professional coaching: a literature review and research agenda.专业教练中的幽默:文献综述与研究议程
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 4;15:1288104. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1288104. eCollection 2024.
4
Establishing circularity: development and validation of the circular work value scale (CWVS).建立循环性:循环工作价值观量表(CWVS)的开发与验证。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1296282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296282. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Humor and power.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:125-128. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Development of a Short and ICD-11 Compatible Measure for Maladaptive Personality Traits Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms.使用蚁群优化算法开发短程且与 ICD-11 兼容的适应不良人格特质测量工具。
Assessment. 2022 Apr;29(3):467-487. doi: 10.1177/1073191120971848. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
3
Developing Cross-Cultural Short Scales Using Ant Colony Optimization.利用蚁群优化算法开发跨文化短量表。
Assessment. 2021 Jan;28(1):199-210. doi: 10.1177/1073191120918026. Epub 2020 May 16.
4
Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external validity?优化人格量表的长度、宽度和平衡:内部特征如何影响外部有效性?
Psychol Assess. 2019 Apr;31(4):444-459. doi: 10.1037/pas0000586. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
Broadening Humor: Comic Styles Differentially Tap into Temperament, Character, and Ability.拓展幽默:喜剧风格对气质、性格和能力的挖掘各有不同。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 18;9:6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006. eCollection 2018.
6
Meta-Heuristics in Short Scale Construction: Ant Colony Optimization and Genetic Algorithm.短尺度施工中的元启发式算法:蚁群优化算法和遗传算法。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0167110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167110. eCollection 2016.
7
Risky business: When humor increases and decreases status.风险行为:幽默何时提升及降低地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):431-455. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000079. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
9
The Experience of Failed Humor: Implications for Interpersonal Affect Regulation.失败的幽默体验:对人际情感调节的启示
J Bus Psychol. 2014;29(4):651-668. doi: 10.1007/s10869-014-9370-9.
10
How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance.你们的会议有趣吗?探究团队互动中的幽默模式与团队绩效之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1278-87. doi: 10.1037/a0038083. Epub 2014 Oct 13.