Xia Yun, Feng Junna, Zhang Hongbo, Xiong Deyu, Kong Lingdong, Seviour Robert, Kong Yunhong
Yunnan Urban Agricultural Engineering & Technological Research Centre, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 16;12:e17231. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17231. eCollection 2024.
is an invasive weed species found in many countries. Methods to control the spread of this weed have been largely unsuccessful. Soil pH is the most important soil factor affecting the availability of nutrients for plant and impacting its growth. Understanding the mechanisms of the influence of soil pH on the growth of may help to develop effective control measures. In this study, we artificially changed the soil pH in pot experiments for . We studied the effects of acidic (pH 5.5), weakly acidic (pH 6.5), neutral (pH 7.2), and alkaline (pH 9.0) soils on the growth, availability of soil nutrients, activity of antioxidant enzymes, levels of redox markers in the leaves, and the structure and diversity of the rhizosphere microbiome. Soil with a pH 7.2 had a higher (47.8%) below-ground height versus soils of pH 5.5 at day 10; plant had a higher (11.3%) above-ground height in pH 7.2 soils than pH 9.0 soils at day 90; no differences in the fresh and dry weights of its above- and belowground parts, plant heights, and root lengths were observed in plants growing in acid, alkaline, or neutral pH soil were observed at day 180. Correspondingly, the antioxidant enzymes SOD (superoxide dismutase), POD (peroxidase), CAT (catalase) and redox markers GSH (glutathione) and MDA (malondialdehyde) were measured in the leaves. Significant differences existed in the activities of CAT and the levels of GSH between those growing in acidic and alkaline soils and those in neutral pH soil at day 90; however, only lower (36.8%) CAT activities in those grown at pH 5.5 than those grown at pH 7.2 were found at day 180. Similarly, significant differences in available P (16.89 3.04 mg Kg) and total K (3.67 0.96 mg Kg), total P (0.37 0.25 g Kg) and total N (0.45 1.09 g Kg) concentrations were found between the rhizosphere soils of grown at pH 9.0 and 7.2 at day 90; no such differences were seen at day 180. High throughput analyses of the 16S rRNA and ITS fragments showed that the rhizosphere microbiome diversity and composition under different soil pH conditions changed over 180 days. The rhizosphere microbiomes differed in diversity, phylum, and generic composition and population interactions under acid and alkaline conditions versus those grown in neutral soils. Soil pH had a greater impact on the diversity and composition of the prokaryotic rhizosphere communities than those of the fungal communities. responded successfully to pH stress by changing the diversity and composition of the rhizosphere microbiome to maintain a balanced nutrient supply to support its normal growth. The unusual pH tolerance of may be one crucial reason for its successful invasion. Our results suggest that attempts use soil pH to control its invasion by changing the soil pH (for example, using lime) will fail.
是一种在许多国家都有发现的入侵性杂草物种。控制这种杂草蔓延的方法在很大程度上并不成功。土壤pH值是影响植物养分有效性并影响其生长的最重要土壤因素。了解土壤pH值对[杂草名称未明确]生长的影响机制可能有助于制定有效的控制措施。在本研究中,我们在盆栽实验中人为改变了[杂草名称未明确]的土壤pH值。我们研究了酸性(pH 5.5)、弱酸性(pH 6.5)、中性(pH 7.2)和碱性(pH 9.0)土壤对其生长、土壤养分有效性、抗氧化酶活性、叶片中氧化还原标记物水平以及根际微生物群落结构和多样性的影响。在第10天,pH 7.2的土壤中[杂草名称未明确]的地下高度比pH 5.5的土壤高47.8%;在第90天,[杂草名称未明确]在pH 7.2的土壤中的地上高度比pH 9.0的土壤高11.3%;在第180天,在酸性、碱性或中性pH土壤中生长的[杂草名称未明确]的地上和地下部分鲜重和干重、株高和根长均未观察到差异。相应地,在叶片中测量了抗氧化酶超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)以及氧化还原标记物谷胱甘肽(GSH)和丙二醛(MDA)。在第90天,在酸性和碱性土壤中生长的[杂草名称未明确]与在中性pH土壤中生长的相比,CAT活性和GSH水平存在显著差异;然而,在第180天,仅发现pH 5.5条件下生长的[杂草名称未明确]的CAT活性比pH 7.2条件下生长的低36.8%。同样,在第90天,pH 9.0和7.2条件下生长的[杂草名称未明确]的根际土壤中有效磷(16.89±3.04 mg Kg)、全钾(3.67±0.96 mg Kg)、全磷(0.37±0.25 g Kg)和全氮(0.45±1.09 g Kg)浓度存在显著差异;在第180天未观察到此类差异。对16S rRNA和ITS片段的高通量分析表明,不同土壤pH条件下根际微生物群落的多样性和组成在180天内发生了变化。与在中性土壤中生长的相比,酸性和碱性条件下根际微生物群落在多样性、门水平和属水平组成以及种群相互作用方面存在差异。土壤pH值对原核根际群落的多样性和组成的影响大于对真菌群落的影响。[杂草名称未明确]通过改变根际微生物群落的多样性和组成成功应对pH胁迫,以维持营养供应平衡来支持其正常生长。[杂草名称未明确]不同寻常的pH耐受性可能是其成功入侵的一个关键原因。我们的结果表明,试图通过改变土壤pH值(例如使用石灰)利用土壤pH值来控制其入侵将会失败。