Eager Sharon, Johnson Sonia, Pitman Alexandra, Uribe Manuela, Qualter Pamela, Pearce Eiluned
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, W1T 7NF, London, UK.
Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05751-x.
Loneliness is a frequently reported problem for young people aged 16 to 24 years old. A variety of interventions have been developed (but in most cases not extensively evaluated) to try and tackle loneliness in this age group. These include interpersonal, intrapersonal, and social approaches that vary in their content and mechanisms of action. The current study aimed to qualitatively examine young peoples' views on the acceptability and feasibility of different loneliness interventions.
Young people from 16 to 24 years old living in the United Kingdom who self-identified as having experienced loneliness were recruited to participate in this study. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews to assess their views on the acceptability and feasibility of loneliness interventions for their age group. Interviews were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis.
Our analysis of 23 individual interview transcripts identified six themes. These related to the appropriate stage for intervention and how different types of strategies may be best suited to particular contexts; the key facilitators and barriers to engaging young people in an intervention; considerations for optimising the delivery of an intervention; divergent views on technology use in strategies to manage loneliness; the scope of an intervention and whether it takes a targeted or general approach; and the idea of combining different options within an intervention to allow tailoring to individual preferences and nature of loneliness.
These findings demonstrate the need for continued development of individualised interventions designed to help manage loneliness in this age group. Future loneliness strategies should be co-produced with young people to ensure that they suit the varying needs of this population.
孤独是16至24岁年轻人中经常被提及的一个问题。人们已经开发了多种干预措施(但在大多数情况下未进行广泛评估)来试图解决这个年龄段的孤独问题。这些措施包括人际、个人内在和社会方法,它们在内容和作用机制上各不相同。本研究旨在定性考察年轻人对不同孤独干预措施的可接受性和可行性的看法。
招募了居住在英国、自我认定经历过孤独的16至24岁年轻人参与本研究。我们进行了半结构化定性访谈,以评估他们对针对其年龄组的孤独干预措施的可接受性和可行性的看法。访谈采用归纳反思主题分析法进行分析。
我们对23份个人访谈记录的分析确定了六个主题。这些主题涉及干预的适当阶段以及不同类型的策略如何可能最适合特定情境;促使年轻人参与干预的关键促进因素和障碍;优化干预实施的考虑因素;在管理孤独的策略中对技术使用的不同看法;干预的范围以及它是采取针对性还是一般性方法;以及在干预中结合不同选项以根据个人偏好和孤独性质进行定制的想法。
这些发现表明需要持续开发旨在帮助管理这个年龄段孤独问题的个性化干预措施。未来的孤独策略应与年轻人共同制定,以确保它们适合这一人群的不同需求。