• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对欧盟的非洲物种有害生物风险评估。

Pest risk assessment of African species for the European Union.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Baptista Paula, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Di Serio Francesco, Gonthier Paolo, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Stefani Emilio, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Civera Antonio Vicent, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Mally Richard, Czwienczek Ewelina, Gobbi Alex, López Mercadal Júlia, Maiorano Andrea, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Pautasso Marco, Rossi Eugenio, Stancanelli Giuseppe, Tramontini Sara, Van der Werf Wopke

出版信息

EFSA J. 2024 Apr 29;22(4):e8739. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8739. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8739
PMID:38686343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11056852/
Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a quantitative risk assessment for the EU of African species (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), which are fruit and shoot borers, especially of eggplant type fruit. The assessment focused on (i) potential pathways for entry, (ii) distribution of infested imports within EU, (iii) climatic conditions favouring establishment, (iv) spread and (v) impact. Options for risk reduction are discussed, but their effectiveness was not quantified. spp. are widely distributed across sub-Saharan Africa but are little studied and they could be much more widespread in Africa than reported. Much African literature erroneously reports them as which is restricted to Asia. The import of eggplant type fruit from sub-Saharan Africa consists of special fruit types and caters mostly to niche markets in the EU. The main pathway for entry is fruit of and exotic varieties of eggplant (). CLIMEX modelling was used with two possible thresholds of ecoclimatic index (EI) to assess establishment potential. Climates favouring establishment occur mostly in southern Europe, where, based on human population, 14% of the imported produce is distributed across NUTS2 regions where EI ≥ 30; or where 23% of the produce is distributed where EI ≥ 15. Over the next 5 years, an annual median estimate of ~ 8600 fruits, originating from Africa, and infested with African spp. are expected to enter EU NUTS2 regions where EI ≥ 15 (90% CR ~ 570-52,700); this drops to ~ 5200 (90% CR ~ 350-32,100) in NUTS2 regions where EI ≥ 30. Escape of adult moths occurs mostly from consumer waste; considering uncertainties in pathway transfer, such as adult emergence, mate finding and survival of progeny, the annual median probability of a mated female establishing a founder population in NUTS regions where EI ≥ 15 was estimated to be 0.0078 (90% CR 0.00023-0.12125). This equates to a median estimate of one founder population ~ every 128 years (90% CR approximately one every 8-4280 years). Using an EI ≥ 30, the median number of founder populations establishing in the EU annually is 0.0048 (90% CR 0.0001-0.0739), equating to a median estimate of one founder population approximately every 210 years (90% CR approximately one every 14-7020 years). Under climate change for the period 2040-2059, the percent of infested produce going to suitable areas would be increased to 33% for EI ≥ 15 and to 21% for EI ≥ 30. Accordingly, the waiting time until the next founder population would be reduced to median estimates of 89 years for EI ≥ 15 (90% CR ~ 6-2980 years) and 139 years for EI ≥ 30 (90% CR 9-4655 years). If a founder population were to establish, it is estimated to spread at a rate of 0.65-7.0 km per year after a lag phase of 5-92 years. spp. are estimated to reduce eggplant yield by a median value of 4.5% (90% CR 0.67%-13%) if growers take no specific action, or 0.54% (90% CR between 0.13% and 1.9%) if they do take targeted action, matching previous estimates made during a risk assessment of from Asia.

摘要

应欧盟委员会的要求,欧洲食品安全局植物健康专家组对非洲 种(鳞翅目:草螟科)进行了欧盟层面的定量风险评估,该物种是果实和嫩梢蛀虫,尤其偏好茄子类果实。评估聚焦于:(i)传入的潜在途径;(ii)受侵染进口产品在欧盟内部的分布;(iii)有利于定殖的气候条件;(iv)扩散;以及(v)影响。文中讨论了降低风险的选项,但未对其有效性进行量化。 种广泛分布于撒哈拉以南非洲,但研究较少,其在非洲的分布可能比报道的更为广泛。许多非洲文献错误地将它们报道为 ,而 仅限于亚洲。从撒哈拉以南非洲进口的茄子类果实包括特殊果实类型,主要供应欧盟的小众市场。主要传入途径是 果实和茄子的外来品种( )。利用CLIMEX模型,采用两个可能的生态气候指数(EI)阈值来评估定殖潜力。有利于定殖的气候主要出现在南欧,基于人口数据,14%的进口农产品分布在EI≥30的NUTS2区域;或23%的农产品分布在EI≥15的区域。在未来5年,预计每年约有8600个源自非洲且受非洲 种侵染的果实进入EI≥15的欧盟NUTS2区域(90%置信区间约为570 - 52700个);在EI≥30的NUTS2区域,这一数字降至约5200个(90%置信区间约为350 - 32100个)。成虫蛾主要从消费者废弃物中逃逸;考虑到途径转移中的不确定性,如成虫羽化、交配寻找和后代存活等,估计在EI≥15的NUTS区域,一只已交配雌蛾建立新种群的年中位概率为0.0078(90%置信区间为0.00023 - 0.12125)。这相当于大约每128年有一个新种群建立的中位估计值(90%置信区间约为每8 - 4280年一个)。采用EI≥30时,每年在欧盟建立的新种群中位数量为0.0048(90%置信区间为0.0001 - 0.0739),相当于大约每210年有一个新种群建立的中位估计值(90%置信区间约为每14 - 7020年一个)。在2040 - 2059年的气候变化情景下,对于EI≥15,受侵染农产品进入适宜区域的比例将增至33%;对于EI≥30,这一比例将增至21%。相应地,直至下一个新种群建立的等待时间将分别降至EI≥15时的中位估计值89年(90%置信区间约为6 - 2980年)和EI≥30时的139年(90%置信区间为9 - 4655年)。如果一个新种群得以建立,预计在5 - 92年的滞后期后,其扩散速度为每年0.65 - 7.0千米。据估计,如果种植者不采取具体行动, 种会使茄子产量中位值降低4.5%(90%置信区间为0.67% - 13%);如果采取针对性行动,产量降低0.54%(90%置信区间在0.13%至1.9%之间),这与之前对来自亚洲的 进行风险评估时的估计相符。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/2d1b1bb76ad6/EFS2-22-e8739-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/a844d22d6cd2/EFS2-22-e8739-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/d1051c3768b3/EFS2-22-e8739-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/b3abeaa7e62f/EFS2-22-e8739-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/f55c019f4d09/EFS2-22-e8739-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/0c91f4dde0c8/EFS2-22-e8739-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/902a7a6e4c28/EFS2-22-e8739-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/2436bfd3f997/EFS2-22-e8739-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/5737b14b245b/EFS2-22-e8739-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/42e93485dea7/EFS2-22-e8739-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/34c39e54af1e/EFS2-22-e8739-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/d03ee8321319/EFS2-22-e8739-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/626243769fea/EFS2-22-e8739-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/c146815fc324/EFS2-22-e8739-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/bb38e1f8b6da/EFS2-22-e8739-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/8d4b8d239c9c/EFS2-22-e8739-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/b3f14a7aae01/EFS2-22-e8739-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/141e27cd8829/EFS2-22-e8739-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/1fcf52570a2b/EFS2-22-e8739-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/9521f365339a/EFS2-22-e8739-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/3bc67b922823/EFS2-22-e8739-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/ee6fc0bdd747/EFS2-22-e8739-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/2d1b1bb76ad6/EFS2-22-e8739-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/a844d22d6cd2/EFS2-22-e8739-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/d1051c3768b3/EFS2-22-e8739-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/b3abeaa7e62f/EFS2-22-e8739-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/f55c019f4d09/EFS2-22-e8739-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/0c91f4dde0c8/EFS2-22-e8739-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/902a7a6e4c28/EFS2-22-e8739-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/2436bfd3f997/EFS2-22-e8739-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/5737b14b245b/EFS2-22-e8739-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/42e93485dea7/EFS2-22-e8739-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/34c39e54af1e/EFS2-22-e8739-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/d03ee8321319/EFS2-22-e8739-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/626243769fea/EFS2-22-e8739-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/c146815fc324/EFS2-22-e8739-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/bb38e1f8b6da/EFS2-22-e8739-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/8d4b8d239c9c/EFS2-22-e8739-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/b3f14a7aae01/EFS2-22-e8739-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/141e27cd8829/EFS2-22-e8739-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/1fcf52570a2b/EFS2-22-e8739-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/9521f365339a/EFS2-22-e8739-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/3bc67b922823/EFS2-22-e8739-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/ee6fc0bdd747/EFS2-22-e8739-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e650/11056852/2d1b1bb76ad6/EFS2-22-e8739-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Pest risk assessment of African species for the European Union.针对欧盟的非洲物种有害生物风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Apr 29;22(4):e8739. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8739. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.针对欧盟的有害生物风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.”似乎不完整,少了关键内容,这里是按照现有内容尽量准确翻译的)
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 12;22(3):e8498. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8498. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2021 Nov 12;19(11):e06890. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6890. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.针对欧盟的有害生物风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.”中“of”后面似乎缺失内容,以上是根据现有内容尽量准确翻译的结果 )
EFSA J. 2022 Nov 8;20(11):e07523. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7523. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不太完整,少了具体评估的内容。以上是按照现有内容翻译的。
EFSA J. 2024 Apr 29;22(4):e8741. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8741. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2021 Nov 8;19(11):e06889. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6889. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不完整,少了具体评估的对象。以上是根据现有内容翻译的。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 5;22(7):e8832. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8832. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
First report of and on and in farmer's fields in southern Ghana.加纳南部农田中 和 对 和 的首次报道。
Bull Entomol Res. 2024 Jun;114(3):359-373. doi: 10.1017/S0007485324000154. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 不过你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不完整,少了具体要评估的内容。
EFSA J. 2023 May 3;21(5):e08005. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8005. eCollection 2023 May.
10
Discovery of an unknown diversity of Leucinodes species damaging Solanaceae fruits in sub-Saharan Africa and moving in trade (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea).在撒哈拉以南非洲发现危害茄科果实并通过贸易传播的未知种类白螟(昆虫纲,鳞翅目,螟蛾总科)。
Zookeys. 2015 Jan 19(472):117-62. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.472.8781. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Standard protocols for plant health scientific assessments.植物健康科学评估的标准规程。
EFSA J. 2024 Sep 5;22(9):e8891. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8891. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.针对欧盟的有害生物风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.”似乎不完整,少了关键内容,这里是按照现有内容尽量准确翻译的)
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 12;22(3):e8498. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8498. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
A spatio-temporal dataset of plant pests' first introductions across the EU and potential entry pathways.一个跨欧盟的植物病虫害首次传入和潜在传入途径的时空数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Oct 21;10(1):731. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02643-9.
3
The Bugs in the Bags: The Risk Associated with the Introduction of Small Quantities of Fruit and Plants by Airline Passengers.
行李中的害虫:与航空乘客携带少量水果和植物入境相关的风险。
Insects. 2022 Jul 10;13(7):617. doi: 10.3390/insects13070617.
4
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2021 Nov 8;19(11):e06889. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6889. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Report on the methodology applied by EFSA to provide a quantitative assessment of pest-related criteria required to rank candidate priority pests as defined by Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)为对《欧盟条例》(EU)2016/2031所定义的候选优先有害生物进行排名所需的有害生物相关标准进行定量评估而采用的方法报告。
EFSA J. 2019 Jun 5;17(6):e05731. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5731. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
7
Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments.科学评估中的不确定性分析指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05123. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123. eCollection 2018 Jan.
8
World Vegetable Center Eggplant Collection: Origin, Composition, Seed Dissemination and Utilization in Breeding.世界蔬菜中心茄子种质资源库:起源、构成、种子传播及在育种中的利用
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 25;8:1484. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01484. eCollection 2017.
9
Discovery of an unknown diversity of Leucinodes species damaging Solanaceae fruits in sub-Saharan Africa and moving in trade (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea).在撒哈拉以南非洲发现危害茄科果实并通过贸易传播的未知种类白螟(昆虫纲,鳞翅目,螟蛾总科)。
Zookeys. 2015 Jan 19(472):117-62. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.472.8781. eCollection 2015.
10
Effects of Withania somnifera on the growth and virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus at sub-MIC levels.睡茄对低于最低抑菌浓度的变形链球菌和远缘链球菌生长和毒力特性的影响。
Anaerobe. 2013 Feb;19:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 7.