• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟的风险评估。 你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不完整,少了具体评估的对象。以上是根据现有内容翻译的。

Risk assessment of for the EU.

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Baptista Paola, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Di Serio Francesco, Gonthier Paolo, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Potting Roel, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Stefani Emilio, Vicent Civera Antonio, van der Werf Wopke, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Loomans Antoon, Christoph Eugen H, Crotta Matteo, Gobbi Alex, Golic Dejana, Maiorano Andrea, Terzidou Anastasia, Milonas Panagiotis

出版信息

EFSA J. 2024 Jul 5;22(7):e8832. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8832. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8832
PMID:38974924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11224772/
Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a quantitative risk assessment for the EU of (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a polyphagous pest occurring in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. The current risk assessment focused on potential pathways for entry, the climatic conditions allowing establishment, the expected spread capacity and the impact considering a time horizon of 10 years (2023-2032). The Panel identified the import of apples, cut flowers and table grapes as the most relevant entry pathways. Over the next 10 years, an annual median estimate of approximately 49.5 (90% certainty range, CR, ranging from 4.0 to 881.2) potential founder populations are expected. When the probability of establishment is considered and climatic indicators are used to define the areas in the EU where establishment is possible, the model estimated a median of 1 founder population every 1.3 years (90% CR: 1 every 30.8 years to 23.3 per year) in the scenario where the areas are defined by the union of all the climatic indicators and 1 founder population every 11.9 years (90% CR: 1 every 256.6 years to 2.5 per year) in the scenario where establishment is possible only in the areas defined by the climatic indicator of minimum soil temperature. The estimated number of founder populations per year is mostly driven by the probability of establishment in the rural areas, infestation rate in table grapes and the probability of transfer to a suitable host in the rural area. The risk of entry for cut flowers and apples is substantially lower than the risk from the table grapes. If such founder populations were to establish, is estimated to spread by natural dispersal and common agricultural practices at a rate of 15.5 m/year (90% CR 5.1-46.8 m/year) after a lag phase of 4.0 years (90% CR 1.3-8.7 years). The impact, expressed as percentage loss of the production directly attributable to in the areas where establishment is possible and assuming farmers do not apply specific control measures was estimated at 0.5% (90% CR 0.01%-2.8%) for cut flowers/foliage, 5.2% (90% CR 2.2%-11.7%) for apples and 2% (90% CR 1.3%-5.2%) for table grapes. Options for risk reduction are discussed, but their effectiveness is not quantified.

摘要

应欧盟委员会的要求,欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组对一种多食性害虫——[害虫名称未给出,原文此处有缺失](鞘翅目:象甲科)进行了针对欧盟的定量风险评估,该害虫在澳大利亚、新西兰和南非均有发生。本次风险评估聚焦于潜在的传入途径、适合定殖的气候条件、预期的扩散能力以及考虑10年时间跨度(2023 - 2032年)的影响。小组确定苹果、切花和鲜食葡萄的进口为最相关的传入途径。在未来10年,预计每年潜在奠基种群的中位数估计约为49.5个(90%置信区间,CR,范围为4.0至881.2个)。当考虑定殖概率并使用气候指标来定义欧盟内可能定殖的区域时,在所有气候指标联合定义区域的情景下,模型估计每1.3年有1个奠基种群的中位数(90% CR:每30.8年1个至每年23.3个),而在仅在最低土壤温度气候指标定义区域可能定殖的情景下,估计每11.9年有1个奠基种群的中位数(90% CR:每256.6年1个至每年2.5个)。每年估计的奠基种群数量主要由农村地区的定殖概率、鲜食葡萄的侵染率以及农村地区转移到合适寄主的概率驱动。切花和苹果的传入风险显著低于鲜食葡萄的风险。如果这些奠基种群得以定殖,预计在4.0年(90% CR 1.3 - 8.7年)的滞后期后,[害虫名称未给出,原文此处有缺失]将通过自然扩散和常见农业活动以每年15.5米(90% CR 5.1 - 46.8米/年)的速度扩散。在可能定殖的区域,假设农民不采取特定控制措施,将直接归因于[害虫名称未给出,原文此处有缺失]的产量损失百分比表示的影响估计为:切花/叶为0.5%(90% CR 0.01% - 2.8%),苹果为5.2%(90% CR 2.2% - 11.7%),鲜食葡萄为2%(90% CR 1.3% - 5.2%)。文中讨论了降低风险的选项,但其有效性未进行量化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/7327d026e057/EFS2-22-e8832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/e79409495d1e/EFS2-22-e8832-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/230d1bb889ab/EFS2-22-e8832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/dbf9c3a6b7e8/EFS2-22-e8832-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/be810adb8f29/EFS2-22-e8832-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/79ff9ce4d06b/EFS2-22-e8832-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/c5a2d0b8e70e/EFS2-22-e8832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/ff6c0c80eea9/EFS2-22-e8832-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/d979d8b18836/EFS2-22-e8832-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/b4d6702fbb31/EFS2-22-e8832-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/4e75413f874e/EFS2-22-e8832-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/25ee8bc017cb/EFS2-22-e8832-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/a1f763340714/EFS2-22-e8832-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/770d254a35b1/EFS2-22-e8832-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/e7c494a00b77/EFS2-22-e8832-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/cdf3d5a5ea2c/EFS2-22-e8832-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/c13f6f0f80f1/EFS2-22-e8832-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/7210f9206d30/EFS2-22-e8832-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/f8dcf7d85334/EFS2-22-e8832-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/6f1feaa6cfef/EFS2-22-e8832-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/09b602f6b612/EFS2-22-e8832-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/7327d026e057/EFS2-22-e8832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/e79409495d1e/EFS2-22-e8832-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/230d1bb889ab/EFS2-22-e8832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/dbf9c3a6b7e8/EFS2-22-e8832-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/be810adb8f29/EFS2-22-e8832-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/79ff9ce4d06b/EFS2-22-e8832-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/c5a2d0b8e70e/EFS2-22-e8832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/ff6c0c80eea9/EFS2-22-e8832-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/d979d8b18836/EFS2-22-e8832-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/b4d6702fbb31/EFS2-22-e8832-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/4e75413f874e/EFS2-22-e8832-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/25ee8bc017cb/EFS2-22-e8832-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/a1f763340714/EFS2-22-e8832-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/770d254a35b1/EFS2-22-e8832-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/e7c494a00b77/EFS2-22-e8832-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/cdf3d5a5ea2c/EFS2-22-e8832-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/c13f6f0f80f1/EFS2-22-e8832-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/7210f9206d30/EFS2-22-e8832-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/f8dcf7d85334/EFS2-22-e8832-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/6f1feaa6cfef/EFS2-22-e8832-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/09b602f6b612/EFS2-22-e8832-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cebc/11224772/7327d026e057/EFS2-22-e8832-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不完整,少了具体评估的对象。以上是根据现有内容翻译的。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 5;22(7):e8832. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8832. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不太完整,少了具体评估的内容。以上是按照现有内容翻译的。
EFSA J. 2024 Apr 29;22(4):e8741. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8741. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2021 Aug 3;19(8):e06800. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6800. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Pest risk assessment of African species for the European Union.针对欧盟的非洲物种有害生物风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Apr 29;22(4):e8739. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8739. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.针对欧盟的有害生物风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.”似乎不完整,少了关键内容,这里是按照现有内容尽量准确翻译的)
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 12;22(3):e8498. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8498. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.针对欧盟的有害生物风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.”中“of”后面似乎缺失内容,以上是根据现有内容尽量准确翻译的结果 )
EFSA J. 2022 Nov 8;20(11):e07523. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7523. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 不过你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不完整,少了具体要评估的内容。
EFSA J. 2023 May 3;21(5):e08005. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8005. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Risk assessment of pv. for the EU.欧盟对脊髓灰质炎病毒的风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Dec 2;20(12):e07641. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7641. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不完整,少了具体评估的对象。以上是根据现有内容翻译的。
EFSA J. 2023 Feb 24;21(2):e07838. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7838. eCollection 2023 Feb.
10
Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.针对欧盟的有害生物风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.”中“of”后面似乎缺少内容,请确认一下是否准确。)
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 31;16(8):e05351. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5351. eCollection 2018 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Standard protocols for plant health scientific assessments.植物健康科学评估的标准规程。
EFSA J. 2024 Sep 5;22(9):e8891. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8891. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk assessment of for the EU.欧盟的风险评估。 你提供的原文“Risk assessment of for the EU.”似乎不太完整,少了具体评估的内容。以上是按照现有内容翻译的。
EFSA J. 2024 Apr 29;22(4):e8741. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8741. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.针对欧盟的有害生物风险评估。 (你提供的原文“Pest risk assessment of for the European Union.”似乎不完整,少了关键内容,这里是按照现有内容尽量准确翻译的)
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 12;22(3):e8498. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8498. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Pest categorisation of .……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2021 Aug 3;19(8):e06800. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6800. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
Use of EFSA Pesticide Residue Intake Model (EFSA PRIMo revision 3).使用欧洲食品安全局农药残留摄入模型(EFSA PRIMo第3版修订本)。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 15;16(1):e05147. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5147. eCollection 2018 Jan.
6
The potential of irradiation as a postharvest disinfestation treatment against Phlyctinus callosus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).辐照作为一种采后防治 Phlyctinus callosus(鞘翅目:象甲科)的消毒处理方法的潜力。
J Econ Entomol. 2014 Feb;107(1):154-60. doi: 10.1603/ec13226.
7
Potential of entomopathogenic nematodes for the control of the banded fruit weevil, Phlyctinus callosus (Schönherr) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).昆虫病原线虫对带状果实象甲(Phlyctinus callosus (Schönherr),鞘翅目:象甲科)的防治潜力
J Helminthol. 2014 Sep;88(3):293-301. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X13000175. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
Heated-controlled atmosphere postharvest treatments for Macchiademus diplopterus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) and Phlyctinus callosus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).加热控制大气采后处理对 Macchiademus diplopterus(半翅目:叶蝉科)和 Phlyctinus callosus(鞘翅目:象甲科)的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Apr;104(2):398-404. doi: 10.1603/ec10316.
9
Seeing the forest through the trees: differential dispersal of Hylobius warreni within modified forest habitats.透过树木看森林:沃氏长小蠹在改良森林栖息地中的差异扩散
Environ Entomol. 2010 Jun;39(3):898-906. doi: 10.1603/EN08269.