Ríos-Fernández Juan Carlos, González-Caballín Juan Manuel, Meana-Fernández Andrés, Gutiérrez-Trashorras Antonio José
University of Oviedo, EDZE (Energy), Campus de Viesques, 33203, Gijón, Asturias, Spain.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 17;10(9):e29781. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29781. eCollection 2024 May 15.
Supermarkets are significant consumers of electricity and contribute to the generation of associated pollutant emissions. This will help to mitigate the impact of increased energy costs on the prices of products sold in supermarkets. Therefore, it is essential to reduce energy consumption, starting with the equipment that consumes the most electricity, such as refrigeration, and using the residual thermal energy generated in supermarkets. This paper discusses the impact of rising energy costs in the post-Covid era and during the energy crisis. It evaluates the environmental and energy benefits of implementing energy improvements and utilizing residual energy in real supermarkets. The analysis takes into account the socio-economic characteristics of the EU-27 countries, which affect the economic feasibility of these measures. This would prevent the release of 122 tons of CO per year for each supermarket, resulting in energy savings of around 70 % or 305 kWh/m. The required investments would have a payback period of 4 years.
超市是电力的重要消费者,并会产生相关污染物排放。这将有助于减轻能源成本上升对超市所售产品价格的影响。因此,减少能源消耗至关重要,首先要从耗电量最大的设备入手,如制冷设备,并利用超市产生的余热。本文讨论了后新冠时代和能源危机期间能源成本上升的影响。它评估了在实际超市中实施能源改进和利用剩余能源的环境和能源效益。该分析考虑了欧盟27国的社会经济特征,这些特征会影响这些措施的经济可行性。这将使每家超市每年减少122吨一氧化碳的排放,从而实现约70%或305千瓦时/米的节能效果。所需投资的回收期为4年。