Graeme Liam G, Hall Kate, Olive Lisa S, Greenwood Christopher J, Couston Nicky, Mattingley Sophie, Francis Lauren M, Hoare Erin, Rice Simon, Bos Jason, Harris Emma, Youssef George J
School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Australian Football League, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 May 7;10(2):e001799. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001799. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to compare talent development athletes to community-level athletes in Australian Rules Football across various markers of healthy youth development.
Survey data were collected from 363 youth athletes (126 women, 232 men, 5 not reported; Mage=18.69 years, SDage=2.62 years, age range 16-25 years) playing Australian Rules Football at a talent development (recruited from Australian Football League Talent Pathway, n=220) or community (n=143) level. Measures included markers of physical health (eg, general health, risk-taking behaviours), psychological and emotional well-being (eg, mental health symptoms, life satisfaction), family and social relationships (eg, social support, relationship status), educational and occupational attainment/engagement (eg, career satisfaction, education), ethical behaviour (eg, moral self-image), civic engagement, life skills (eg, self-mastery, coping), and demographics.
Based on regression models, relative to community-level athletes, talent development athletes reported better physical health (d=0.51), lower injury rates (OR=0.50) and less problematic drug use (d=-0.46). Talent development athletes also reported better psychological and emotional well-being, evidenced by lower stress (d=-0.30), higher life satisfaction (d=0.47) and less problematic gambling (d=-0.34). Additionally, talent development athletes reported higher family support (d=0.49), lower likelihood of poor educational outcomes (less than expected educational stage; OR=0.37), lower intention to complete less than year 12 education (OR=0.18), higher career satisfaction (d=0.42), higher self-mastery (d=0.37) and higher perfectionistic striving (d=0.59).
Findings demonstrate markers of healthier development within talent development athletes relative to community athlete peers. Investment in community-level sports may be warranted to improve healthy development. However, further causal evidence is required.
本研究旨在比较澳大利亚式足球项目中,精英培养体系下的运动员与社区层面运动员在青少年健康发展的各项指标上的差异。
收集了363名青少年运动员(126名女性,232名男性,5名未报告性别;年龄均值=18.69岁,标准差=2.62岁,年龄范围16 - 25岁)的调查数据,这些运动员参与澳大利亚式足球运动,分别处于精英培养体系(从澳大利亚足球联赛人才培养路径中招募,n = 220)或社区层面(n = 143)。测量指标包括身体健康指标(如总体健康状况、冒险行为)、心理和情绪幸福感(如心理健康症状、生活满意度)、家庭和社会关系(如社会支持、恋爱状况)、教育和职业成就/参与度(如职业满意度、教育程度)、道德行为(如道德自我认知)、公民参与度、生活技能(如自我掌控、应对能力)以及人口统计学信息。
基于回归模型,与社区层面运动员相比,精英培养体系下的运动员报告的身体健康状况更好(效应量d = 0.51)、受伤率更低(比值比OR = 0.50)且药物使用问题更少(效应量d = -0.46)。精英培养体系下的运动员还报告了更好的心理和情绪幸福感,表现为压力更低(效应量d = -0.30)、生活满意度更高(效应量d = 0.47)且赌博问题更少(效应量d = -0.34)。此外,精英培养体系下的运动员报告了更高的家庭支持(效应量d = 0.49)、教育成果不佳的可能性更低(未达到预期教育阶段;比值比OR = (此处原文有误,应是0.37))、完成12年级以下教育的意愿更低(比值比OR = 0.18)、职业满意度更高(效应量d = 0.42)、自我掌控能力更高(效应量d = 0.37)以及完美主义追求更高(效应量d = 0.59)。
研究结果表明,相对于社区层面的运动员同龄人,精英培养体系下的运动员有更健康发展的指标。对社区层面体育的投资可能有助于促进健康发展。然而,还需要进一步的因果证据。