Courjon J H, Clément G, Schmid R
Exp Brain Res. 1985;59(1):10-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00237660.
In order to clarify the problem of which stimulus parameters affect vestibular habituation, a group of cats was submitted to repeated velocity steps involving changes in either the step amplitude or the interval between two consecutive steps. In the first two experiments, the protocol was the same as in a previous study which used steps of 160 degrees/s separated by 60 s, except that the steps were of 80 degrees/s and 16 degrees/s. In the remaining experiments the step amplitude was kept constant (160 degrees/s) and the interstimulus interval was changed: each step was delivered either immediately after the reversal of the nystagmus elicited by the preceding step (only a few beats in the reversed direction were allowed to occur) or immediately before (no beats in the reversed direction). Vestibular habituation was found to occur in both experiments of the first series. Nevertheless, the marked initial suppression of the response, that was reported as one aspect of vestibular habituation to steps of 160 degrees/s, was clearly present when steps of 80 degrees/s were used, but was not as clear when the step amplitude was reduced to 16 degrees/s. The experiments of the second series showed that a typical vestibular habituation still occurs when steps are delivered just after the reversal of nystagmus. On the contrary, no habituation was observed when steps preceded the reversal of nystagmus. It was concluded that the presence of an anticompensatory phase is interpreted by the central nervous system as a sign that the response evoked in a reflex way is functionally meaningless or even detrimental. An habituation process is then started to suppress the response.
为了阐明哪些刺激参数会影响前庭习服,一组猫被施加了重复的速度阶跃,其中涉及阶跃幅度或两个连续阶跃之间的间隔的变化。在前两个实验中,实验方案与之前一项研究相同,之前的研究使用的是160度/秒的阶跃,间隔为60秒,不同之处在于此次阶跃为80度/秒和16度/秒。在其余实验中,阶跃幅度保持恒定(160度/秒),刺激间隔发生变化:每个阶跃在前一个阶跃诱发的眼震反转后立即施加(只允许出现少数反向跳动)或在反转前立即施加(不出现反向跳动)。在前一系列的两个实验中均发现了前庭习服现象。然而,当使用80度/秒的阶跃时,明显出现了最初对反应的显著抑制,这被报告为前庭对160度/秒阶跃习服的一个方面,但当阶跃幅度降至16度/秒时,这种抑制就不那么明显了。第二系列实验表明,当在眼震反转后立即施加阶跃时,仍会出现典型的前庭习服。相反,当阶跃在眼震反转之前施加时,未观察到习服现象。得出的结论是,中枢神经系统将反补偿阶段的存在解释为以反射方式诱发的反应在功能上无意义甚至有害的信号。然后开始一个习服过程来抑制该反应。