Rozani Sofia, Lykoudis Panagis M
School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.
Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 May 15;16(5):1683-1689. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1683.
Despite colorectal cancer's (CRC) high global incidence, residents of low- and middle- income countries, as well as low-income minorities in advanced economies have low screening rates. Observational studies demonstrate that in these groups higher incidence of CRC is observed, yet screening rates remain low for consistent reasons. Low income, low educational background, and lack of awareness in combination with inadequate social security of certain population groups impede access and compliance rates to CRC screening. On the other hand, despite the global availability of multiple screening approaches (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test, computed tomography-colonography, ) with proven diagnostic validity, many low-income countries still lack established screening programs. The absence of screening guidelines in these countries along with the heterogeneity of guidelines in the rest of the world, demonstrate the need for global measures to tackle this issue comprehensively. An essential step forward is to develop a global approach that will link specific elements of screening with the incidence and available resources in each country, to ensure the achievement of at least a minimum screening program in low-income countries. Utilizing cheaper, cost-effective techniques, which can be carried out by less specialized healthcare providers, might not be equivalent to endoscopy for CRC screening but seems more realistic for areas with fewer resources. Awareness has been highlighted as the most pivotal element for the effective implementation of any screening program concerning CRC. Moreover, multiple studies have demonstrated that outreach strategies and community-based educational programs are associated with encouraging outcomes, yet a centrally coordinated expansion of these programs could provide more consistent results. Additionally, patient navigator programs, wherever implemented, have increased CRC screening and improved follow-up. Therefore, global coordination and patient education seem to be the main areas on which policy making needs to focus.
尽管结直肠癌(CRC)在全球发病率很高,但低收入和中等收入国家的居民,以及发达经济体中的低收入少数群体的筛查率很低。观察性研究表明,在这些群体中结直肠癌的发病率较高,但由于一些持续存在的原因,筛查率仍然很低。低收入、低教育背景、缺乏认识,再加上某些人群社会保障不足,阻碍了结直肠癌筛查的可及性和依从率。另一方面,尽管全球有多种经证实具有诊断有效性的筛查方法(结肠镜检查、乙状结肠镜检查、粪便潜血试验、粪便免疫化学试验、计算机断层扫描结肠成像),但许多低收入国家仍缺乏成熟的筛查项目。这些国家缺乏筛查指南,以及世界其他地区指南的异质性,表明需要采取全球措施来全面解决这个问题。向前迈出的关键一步是制定一种全球方法,将筛查的具体要素与每个国家的发病率和可用资源联系起来,以确保在低收入国家至少实现最低限度的筛查项目。使用成本更低、更具成本效益的技术,这些技术可由专业性较低的医疗服务提供者实施,虽然可能不等同于用于结直肠癌筛查的内镜检查,但对于资源较少的地区似乎更现实。提高认识被强调为有效实施任何结直肠癌筛查项目的最关键因素。此外,多项研究表明,外展策略和基于社区的教育项目会带来令人鼓舞的结果,但对这些项目进行集中协调的扩展可能会产生更一致的结果。此外,无论在何处实施患者导航项目,都提高了结直肠癌筛查率并改善了后续跟进。因此,全球协调和患者教育似乎是政策制定需要关注的主要领域。