Stivers Tanya, Chalfoun Andrew, Rossi Giovanni
Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Sociol. 2024 May 10;9:1369776. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1369776. eCollection 2024.
Social interaction is organized around norms and preferences that guide our construction of actions and our interpretation of those of others, creating a reflexive moral order. Sociological theory suggests two possibilities for the type of moral order that underlies the policing of interactional norm and preference violations: a morality that focuses on the of violations themselves and a morality that focuses on the of actors as they maintain their conduct's comprehensibility, even when they depart from norms and preferences. We find that actors are more likely to reproach interactional violations for which an account is not provided by the transgressor, and that actors weakly reproach or let pass first offenses while more strongly policing violators who persist in bad behavior. Based on these findings, we outline a theory of interactional policing that rests not on the of the violation but rather on actors' moral .
社会互动围绕着规范和偏好展开,这些规范和偏好指导着我们对行为的构建以及对他人行为的解读,从而形成一种反思性的道德秩序。社会学理论提出了两种可能性,即构成互动规范和偏好违规行为监管基础的道德秩序类型:一种道德关注违规行为本身,另一种道德关注行为者在保持其行为可理解性时的表现,即使他们偏离了规范和偏好。我们发现,行为者更有可能指责违规者未对互动违规行为作出解释的情况,而且行为者对初犯的指责较轻或不予追究,而对持续不良行为的违规者则加强监管。基于这些发现,我们勾勒出一种互动监管理论,该理论并非基于违规行为本身,而是基于行为者的道德考量。