Suppr超能文献

参与式组织干预对心理健康和工作绩效的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Effects of participatory organizational interventions on mental health and work performance: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Digital Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae028.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Participatory organizational interventions to improve psychosocial working conditions are important for a safe and healthy work environment. However, there are few systematic reviews or meta-analyses investigating the effects of these interventions on workers' mental health and work-related outcomes. We intend to apply the protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of participatory organizational intervention on mental health and work performance.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The participants, interventions, comparisons, and outcomes (PICO) of the studies in this systematic review and meta-analysis are defined as follows: (P) inclusion of all workers, (I) participatory organizational intervention, (C) treatment as usual or no intervention (including waitlist control), and (O) mental health and work performance. Published studies will be searched using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and Japan Medical Abstracts Society. Studies that (1) include participatory organizational intervention, (2) include participants who were working as of the baseline survey period, (3) assess mental health or work performance outcomes, (4) use a cluster randomized controlled trials design, (5) are published in English or Japanese, and (6) are published in peer-reviewed journals (including advanced online publication) will be included. Study selection and the risk-of-bias assessment will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. A meta-analysis will be performed to statistically synthesize the included studies. Publication bias will be assessed for meta-bias using Egger's test as well as visually on a funnel plot. We will assess heterogeneity by using the Q statistic.

摘要

简介

参与式组织干预措施可改善心理社会工作条件,对于安全健康的工作环境至关重要。然而,很少有系统评价或荟萃分析研究这些干预措施对工人心理健康和与工作相关结果的影响。我们旨在应用系统评价和荟萃分析的方案,研究参与式组织干预对心理健康和工作绩效的影响。

方法和分析

本系统评价和荟萃分析的研究对象、干预措施、比较和结局(PICO)定义如下:(P)纳入所有工人,(I)参与式组织干预,(C)常规治疗或无干预(包括等待名单对照),(O)心理健康和工作绩效。将使用以下电子数据库搜索已发表的研究:PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、PsycArticles 和日本医学摘要学会。符合以下标准的研究将被纳入:(1)包括参与式组织干预,(2)纳入基线调查期间正在工作的参与者,(3)评估心理健康或工作绩效结果,(4)使用群组随机对照试验设计,(5)以英文或日文发表,(6)发表在同行评议期刊上(包括预印本)。研究选择和偏倚风险评估将由 2 位评审员独立进行。将对纳入的研究进行荟萃分析,以进行统计学综合。使用 Egger 检验和漏斗图直观评估发表偏倚。我们将使用 Q 统计量评估异质性。

相似文献

9
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A proposed definition of participatory organizational interventions.
J Occup Health. 2023 Jan;65(1):e12386. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12386.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
3
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
6
Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13(11):CD002892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub3.
7
Effects of organisational-level interventions at work on employees' health: a systematic review.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 8;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-135.
9
Effect of a participatory ergonomics intervention on psychosocial factors at work in a randomised controlled trial.
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Mar;67(3):170-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.043786. Epub 2009 Sep 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验