• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Characteristics that increase the risk for pain on propofol injection.增加丙泊酚注射痛风险的特征。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 May 28;24(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02573-y.
2
Pain on propofol injection: Causes and remedies.丙泊酚注射时的疼痛:原因与对策。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Nov-Dec;48(6):617-623. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.194845.
3
Pretreatment with flurbiprofen axetil, flurbiprofen axetil preceded by venous occlusion, and a mixture of flurbiprofen axetil and propofol in reducing pain on injection of propofol in adult Japanese surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.氟比洛芬酯预处理、静脉闭塞先行的氟比洛芬酯预处理以及氟比洛芬酯与丙泊酚混合使用对成年日本外科手术患者丙泊酚注射时疼痛的减轻作用:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.014.
4
Comparison of lidocaine, metoclopramide, and flurbiprofen axetil for reducing pain on injection of propofol in Japanese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study.利多卡因、甲氧氯普胺和氟比洛芬酯用于减轻日本成年外科手术患者丙泊酚注射疼痛的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.018.
5
Flurbiprofen axetil preceded by venous occlusion in the prevention of pain on propofol injection in the hand: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, dose-finding study in Japanese adult surgical patients.在日本成年外科手术患者中进行的一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、载体对照、剂量探索研究:手部静脉闭塞前置氟比洛芬酯预防丙泊酚注射痛。
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.003.
6
Dexmedetomidine pretreatment alleviates propofol injection pain.右美托咪定预处理可减轻丙泊酚注射痛。
Ups J Med Sci. 2014 Nov;119(4):338-42. doi: 10.3109/03009734.2014.941049. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
7
Prevention of pain due to injection of propofol with IV administration of lidocaine 40 mg + metoclopramide 2.5, 5, or 10 mg or saline: a randomized, double-blind study in Japanese adult surgical patients.静脉注射40毫克利多卡因加2.5、5或10毫克甲氧氯普胺或生理盐水预防丙泊酚注射所致疼痛:一项针对日本成年外科患者的随机双盲研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):856-861. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.019.
8
Efficacy of combination intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone on propofol injection pain: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study in adult Korean surgical patients.静脉注射利多卡因与地塞米松联合应用对丙泊酚注射痛的疗效:一项针对成年韩国外科手术患者的随机、双盲、前瞻性研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Jun;30(6):1113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.019.
9
Incidence of pain after intravenous injection of a medium-/long-chain triglyceride emulsion of propofol. An observational study in 1375 patients.静脉注射丙泊酚中/长链甘油三酯乳剂后疼痛的发生率。一项对1375例患者的观察性研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2003;53(9):621-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297158.
10
Pain on injection of propofol: propofol LCT vs propofol MCT/LCT with or without lidocaine pretreatment.丙泊酚注射时的疼痛:长链丙泊酚与中/长链丙泊酚对比,利多卡因预处理与否的影响
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Sep;89 Suppl 3:S86-91.

引用本文的文献

1
The safety and efficacy of remimazolam, ciprofol, and propofol anesthesia in endoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.瑞马唑仑、环泊酚和丙泊酚用于内镜检查麻醉的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 8;25(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03108-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Best practice in the use of peripheral venous catheters: A scoping review and expert consensus.外周静脉导管使用的最佳实践:一项范围综述与专家共识
Infect Prev Pract. 2023 Feb 3;5(2):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100271. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Is propofol injection pain really important to patients?丙泊酚注射痛对患者真的很重要吗?
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Feb 17;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0321-7.
4
Intravenous lidocaine pretreatment with venous occlusion for reducing microemulsion propofol induced pain: comparison of three doses of lidocaine.静脉注射利多卡因并采用静脉阻断法预处理以减轻微乳剂丙泊酚所致疼痛:三种剂量利多卡因的比较
J Int Med Res. 2014 Apr;42(2):368-75. doi: 10.1177/0300060513507391. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
5
Lidocaine pretreatment with tourniquet versus lidocaine-propofol admixture for attenuating propofol injection pain: a randomized controlled trial.止血带联合利多卡因预处理与利多卡因-丙泊酚混合液减轻丙泊酚注射痛:一项随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820306da.
6
Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis.预防丙泊酚注射痛的措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.
7
Clinical factors affecting the pain on injection of propofol.影响丙泊酚注射痛的临床因素。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Mar;58(3):239-43. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.3.239. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
8
A comparison of pretreatment with fentanyl and lidocaine preceded by venous occlusion for reducing pain on injection of propofol: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult Japanese surgical patients.芬太尼和利多卡因预处理联合静脉闭塞用于减轻丙泊酚注射痛的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究在成年日本手术患者中的应用。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.012.
9
Pain on injection with microemulsion propofol.注射微乳状丙泊酚时出现疼痛。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Mar;67(3):316-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03358.x. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
10
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

增加丙泊酚注射痛风险的特征。

Characteristics that increase the risk for pain on propofol injection.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University Phoenix, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Creighton University Phoenix, 350 W Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 May 28;24(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02573-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02573-y
PMID:38807072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11131289/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol for anesthesia has become increasingly popular for endoscopic procedures. However, pain on propofol injection (POPI) remains an issue with administration. The primary endpoint of this study was to identify patient characteristics and factors, such as IV site and gauge, that could predict the occurrence of POPI.

METHODS

This was a prospective chart review study of 291 patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. The patient's demographics, intravenous (IV) site, and gauge were extrapolated. POPI was scored 0-3: 0 for no pain, 1 for minimal discomfort or awareness of sensation, 2 for discomfort but manageable/tolerable, and 3 for severe discomfort with writhing.

RESULTS

291 patient charts were reviewed. One patient was excluded for a lower extremity IV site. 225 (77.6%) had no pain, 48 (16.6%) grade 1 pain, 16 (5.5%) grade 2 pain, and 1 (0.3%) grade 3 pain. 137, 13, and 140 patients respectively had antecubital (AC), forearm, and hand IVs. Zero patients with an AC IV experienced a score greater than 1. Compared to AC, forearm IVs with pain of 2-3 had a univariate odds ratio (OR) of 11.3 (0.66,1.92; p-value < 0.001), and hand IVs had a univariate OR of 18.8 (2.46,143.3; p-value < 0.001) with a multivariable OR 15.2 (1.93,118.9; p-value 0.004). Patients with anxiety/depression and pain had a univariate OR 2.31 (1.09, 7.27; p-value 0.031) with a multivariable OR 2.85 (1.06, 7.74; p-value 0.039). SSRI/SNRI use had a univariate OR 1.56 (0.57,4.28; p-value 0.38). Alcohol use had a univariate OR 1.24 (0.39,3.91; p-value 0.71). Narcotic use had a Univariate OR 6.18 (1.49,25.6; p-value 0.012). Diabetic patients had a univariate OR of 1.42 (0.45,4.48; p-value 0.55). Chronic pain had a univariate OR of 3.11 (1.04,9.28; p-value 0.042). Females had a univariate OR 0.98 (0.37,2.63; p-value 0.95).

CONCLUSION

This study identified potential characteristics for having POPI. The incidence of POPI was statistically significant in patients with hand and forearm IVs compared to AC IV sites, larger IV gauges, history of depression/anxiety, history of chronic narcotic use, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain syndromes. This shows the potential of premedicating with analgesics or using AC sites on these select patients to help reduce the risk of POPI.

摘要

背景

异丙酚作为麻醉剂在内镜手术中越来越受欢迎。然而,异丙酚注射疼痛(POPI)仍然是一个问题。本研究的主要终点是确定可能预测 POPI 发生的患者特征和因素,如静脉部位和规格。

方法

这是一项对 291 例接受内镜手术的患者进行的前瞻性图表回顾研究。提取患者的人口统计学资料、静脉(IV)部位和规格。POPI 评分 0-3 分:0 分为无痛,1 分为轻微不适或有感觉,2 分为不适但可耐受/可忍受,3 分为严重不适伴扭动。

结果

共回顾了 291 份患者图表。1 名患者因下肢 IV 部位而被排除。225 例(77.6%)无痛,48 例(16.6%)轻度疼痛,16 例(5.5%)中度疼痛,1 例(0.3%)重度疼痛。分别有 137、13 和 140 例患者有肘前(AC)、前臂和手部 IV。AC 静脉无一人疼痛评分大于 1。与 AC 相比,有 2-3 级疼痛的前臂 IV 的单变量优势比(OR)为 11.3(0.66,1.92;p 值<0.001),手部 IV 的 OR 为 18.8(2.46,143.3;p 值<0.001),多变量 OR 为 15.2(1.93,118.9;p 值 0.004)。焦虑/抑郁和疼痛患者的单变量 OR 为 2.31(1.09,7.27;p 值 0.031),多变量 OR 为 2.85(1.06,7.74;p 值 0.039)。SSRIs/SNRIs 使用者的单变量 OR 为 1.56(0.57,4.28;p 值 0.38)。酒精使用者的单变量 OR 为 1.24(0.39,3.91;p 值 0.71)。阿片类药物使用者的单变量 OR 为 6.18(1.49,25.6;p 值 0.012)。糖尿病患者的单变量 OR 为 1.42(0.45,4.48;p 值 0.55)。慢性疼痛患者的单变量 OR 为 3.11(1.04,9.28;p 值 0.042)。女性的单变量 OR 为 0.98(0.37,2.63;p 值 0.95)。

结论

本研究确定了 POPI 的潜在特征。与 AC 静脉部位相比,手部和前臂静脉部位、较大的静脉规格、抑郁/焦虑史、慢性阿片类药物使用史、纤维肌痛和慢性疼痛综合征患者发生 POPI 的发生率具有统计学意义。这表明在这些特定患者中预先使用镇痛药或使用 AC 部位有可能降低 POPI 的风险。