Horesh Noah, Trinko David A, Quinn Jason C
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, 1374 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 1;15(1):4680. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49157-5.
The seamless adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in the United States necessitates the development of extensive and effective charging infrastructure. Various charging systems have been proposed, including Direct Current Fast Charging, Battery Swapping, and Dynamic Wireless Power Transfer. While many studies have evaluated the charging costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of EVs, a comprehensive analysis comparing these systems and their implications across vehicle categories remains unexplored. This study compares the total cost of ownership (TCO) and GHG-intensity of EVs using these charging systems. Based on nationwide infrastructure deployment simulations, the change to TCO from adopting EVs varies by scenario, vehicle category, and location, with local fuel prices, electricity prices, and traffic volumes dramatically impacting results. Further, EV GHG-intensity depends on local electricity mixes and infrastructure utilizations. This research highlights the responsiveness of EV benefits resulting from technology advancements, deployment decisions, and policymaking.
在美国,电动汽车(EV)的无缝采用需要发展广泛且有效的充电基础设施。已经提出了各种充电系统,包括直流快速充电、电池更换和动态无线电力传输。虽然许多研究评估了电动汽车的充电成本和温室气体(GHG)强度,但尚未对这些系统及其在不同车辆类别中的影响进行全面分析比较。本研究比较了使用这些充电系统的电动汽车的总拥有成本(TCO)和温室气体强度。基于全国范围的基础设施部署模拟,采用电动汽车对TCO的改变因情景、车辆类别和地点而异,当地的燃料价格、电价和交通流量对结果有显著影响。此外,电动汽车的温室气体强度取决于当地的电力组合和基础设施利用率。这项研究突出了技术进步、部署决策和政策制定所带来的电动汽车效益的响应性。