• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安大略省电力系统的边际温室气体排放及其对电动汽车充电的影响。

Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering , University of Toronto 35 St. George Street , Toronto , ON M5S 1A4 , Canada.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7903-7912. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01519. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.9b01519
PMID:31244061
Abstract

To estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions of electric vehicles (EVs) deployment, it is important to account for emissions from electricity generation. Since such emissions change according to temporal patterns of electricity generation and EV charging, this study operationalizes the concept of marginal emission factors (MEFs) and uses person-level travel activity data to simulate charging scenarios. Our study is set in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area in Ontario, Canada. After generating hourly MEFs using a multiple linear regression model, we estimated GHG emissions for EV charging at two EV penetration rates, 5% and 30%, and five charging scenarios: home, work and shopping, night, downtown vs suburb, and an optimal low emission charging scenario, matching charging time with the lowest available MEF. We observed that vehicle electrification substantially reduces GHG emissions, even when using MEFs that are up to seven times higher than average electricity emission factors. With Ontario's 2017 electricity generation mix, EVs achieve over 80% lower fuel cycle emissions compared with equivalent sets of gasoline vehicles. At 5% penetration, night charging nearly matches low emission charging, but night charging emissions increase with 30% EV penetration, suggesting a need for policy that can smooth out charging demand after midnight.

摘要

为了估算电动汽车 (EV) 部署的温室气体 (GHG) 减排量,需要考虑发电产生的排放。由于这些排放会根据发电和电动汽车充电的时间模式而变化,因此本研究将边际排放因子 (MEF) 的概念实用化,并使用个人层面的出行活动数据来模拟充电场景。我们的研究以加拿大安大略省大多伦多和汉密尔顿地区为背景。在使用多元线性回归模型生成每小时 MEF 后,我们根据两种电动汽车渗透率(5%和 30%)和五种充电场景(家庭、工作和购物、夜间、市区与郊区以及最佳低排放充电场景)来估计电动汽车充电的 GHG 排放,该最佳低排放充电场景使充电时间与最低可用 MEF 相匹配。我们发现,即使使用比平均电力排放因子高出多达七倍的 MEF,车辆电气化也能大幅减少 GHG 排放。在安大略省 2017 年的发电组合中,与同等数量的汽油车相比,电动汽车的燃料循环排放量降低了 80%以上。在 5%的渗透率下,夜间充电几乎可以与低排放充电相匹配,但随着 30%的电动汽车渗透率的增加,夜间充电的排放量会增加,这表明需要有政策来平滑午夜后的充电需求。

相似文献

1
Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.安大略省电力系统的边际温室气体排放及其对电动汽车充电的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7903-7912. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01519. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
2
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.私人与共享、自动化电动汽车在美国个人交通中的应用:能源利用、温室气体排放、电网整合以及成本影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 2;55(5):3229-3239. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06655. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Transport oil product consumption and GHG emission reduction potential in China: An electric vehicle-based scenario analysis.中国油品运输领域产品能耗及温室气体减排潜力:基于电动汽车的情景分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0222448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222448. eCollection 2019.
5
Hourly Power Grid Variations, Electric Vehicle Charging Patterns, and Operating Emissions.电网小时级波动、电动汽车充电模式与运行排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Dec 15;54(24):16071-16085. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02312. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.中国苏州市采用新能源汽车的温室气体排放效益:一项案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(50):76286-76297. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21284-w. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
7
Charging Strategies to Minimize Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electrified Delivery Vehicles.充电策略以最小化电气化配送车辆的温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jul 20;55(14):10108-10120. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03483. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO₂ Emissions across the United States.美国电动汽车生命周期二氧化碳排放的区域差异和不确定性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 21;49(14):8844-55. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00815. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.中国汽油车和插电式电动车的省级温室气体排放:基于消费电力视角的比较。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6944-6956. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08217. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China.在碳达峰和碳中和的背景下,哪种类型的电动汽车最值得推广?以中国一特大城市为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155626. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155626. Epub 2022 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning up while Changing Gears: The Role of Battery Design, Fossil Fuel Power Plants, and Vehicle Policy for Reducing Emissions in the Transition to Electric Vehicles.在换挡的同时进行清洁:电池设计、火力发电厂和车辆政策在向电动汽车过渡过程中减少排放的作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 27;58(8):3787-3799. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07098. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
2
Multisectoral drivers of decarbonizing battery electric vehicles in China.中国电池电动汽车脱碳的多部门驱动因素。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 May 16;2(5):pgad123. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad123. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Lifecycle cost and carbon implications of residential solar-plus-storage in California.
加利福尼亚州住宅太阳能加储能系统的生命周期成本及碳排放影响
iScience. 2021 Nov 22;24(12):103492. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103492. eCollection 2021 Dec 17.