• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私人与共享、自动化电动汽车在美国个人交通中的应用:能源利用、温室气体排放、电网整合以及成本影响。

Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.

机构信息

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720-8099, United States.

Marain Inc., https://www.marain.ai/.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 2;55(5):3229-3239. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06655. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c06655
PMID:33566604
Abstract

Transportation is the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption globally. While the convergence of shared mobility, vehicle automation, and electrification has the potential to drastically reduce transportation impacts, it requires careful integration with rapidly evolving electricity systems. Here, we examine these interactions using a U.S.-wide simulation framework encompassing private electric vehicles (EVs), shared automated EVs (SAEVs), charging infrastructure, controlled EV charging, and a grid economic dispatch model to simulate personal mobility exclusively using EVs. We find that private EVs with uncontrolled charging would reduce GHG emissions by 46% compared to gasoline vehicles. Private EVs with fleetwide controlled charging would achieve a 49% reduction in emissions from baseline and reduce peak charging demand by 53% from the uncontrolled scenario. We also find that an SAEV fleet 9% the size of today's active vehicle fleet can satisfy trip demand with only 2.6 million chargers (0.2 per EV). Such an SAEV fleet would achieve a 70% reduction in GHG emissions at 41% of the lifecycle cost as a private EV fleet with controlled charging. The emissions and cost advantage of SAEVs is primarily due to reduced vehicle manufacturing compared with private EVs.

摘要

交通是温室气体(GHG)排放和能源消耗增长最快的来源。虽然共享出行、车辆自动化和电气化的融合有可能大幅减少交通的影响,但这需要与快速发展的电力系统进行谨慎整合。在这里,我们使用一个涵盖美国范围的模拟框架来研究这些相互作用,该框架包括私人电动汽车(EV)、共享自动驾驶电动汽车(SAEV)、充电基础设施、可控 EV 充电和电网经济调度模型,以仅使用 EV 模拟个人出行。我们发现,与汽油车相比,未经控制的私人电动汽车充电可减少 46%的温室气体排放。如果对私人电动汽车进行全面的车队控制充电,那么与基线相比,排放量将减少 49%,与未经控制的情况相比,峰值充电需求将减少 53%。我们还发现,规模为当今活跃汽车车队 9%的 SAEV 车队仅需 260 万个充电器(每辆电动汽车 0.2 个)就可以满足出行需求。这样的 SAEV 车队的温室气体排放量将减少 70%,生命周期成本仅为具有可控充电的私人电动汽车车队的 41%。与私人电动汽车相比,SAEV 的车辆制造减少是其具有排放和成本优势的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts.私人与共享、自动化电动汽车在美国个人交通中的应用:能源利用、温室气体排放、电网整合以及成本影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 2;55(5):3229-3239. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06655. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.安大略省电力系统的边际温室气体排放及其对电动汽车充电的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7903-7912. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01519. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
4
Transport oil product consumption and GHG emission reduction potential in China: An electric vehicle-based scenario analysis.中国油品运输领域产品能耗及温室气体减排潜力:基于电动汽车的情景分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0222448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222448. eCollection 2019.
5
Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China.在碳达峰和碳中和的背景下,哪种类型的电动汽车最值得推广?以中国一特大城市为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155626. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155626. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.中国苏州市采用新能源汽车的温室气体排放效益:一项案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(50):76286-76297. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21284-w. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
7
Charging Strategies to Minimize Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electrified Delivery Vehicles.充电策略以最小化电气化配送车辆的温室气体排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jul 20;55(14):10108-10120. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03483. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Cost, Energy, and Environmental Impact of Automated Electric Taxi Fleets in Manhattan.曼哈顿自动化电动出租车车队的成本、能源和环境影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Apr 17;52(8):4920-4928. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04732. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Current and future greenhouse gas emissions associated with electricity generation in China: implications for electric vehicles.中国发电相关的当前和未来温室气体排放:对电动汽车的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jun 17;48(12):7069-75. doi: 10.1021/es500524e. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
10
Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.中国汽油车和插电式电动车的省级温室气体排放:基于消费电力视角的比较。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6944-6956. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08217. Epub 2021 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning up while Changing Gears: The Role of Battery Design, Fossil Fuel Power Plants, and Vehicle Policy for Reducing Emissions in the Transition to Electric Vehicles.在换挡的同时进行清洁:电池设计、火力发电厂和车辆政策在向电动汽车过渡过程中减少排放的作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 27;58(8):3787-3799. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07098. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
2
Ensuring greenhouse gas reductions from electric vehicles compared to hybrid gasoline vehicles requires a cleaner U.S. electricity grid.要确保电动汽车相比混合动力汽油汽车能够减少温室气体排放,美国的电网必须更加清洁。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51697-1.
3
Electrifying New York City Ride-Hailing fleets: An examination of the need for public fast charging.
为纽约市网约车车队供电:对公共快速充电需求的考察
iScience. 2022 Mar 28;25(4):104171. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104171. eCollection 2022 Apr 15.