Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Innovation, Technology, and Entrepreneurship, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63324-0.
This study aims to take higher-education students as examples to understand and compare artistic and engineering mindsets in creative processes using EEG. Fifteen Master of Fine Arts (MFA) visual arts and fifteen Master of Engineering (MEng) design engineering students were recruited and asked to complete alternative uses tasks wearing an EEG headset. The results revealed that (1) the engineering-mindset students responded to creative ideas faster than artistic-mindset students. (2) Although in creative processes both artistic- and engineering-mindset students showed Theta, Alpha, and Beta wave activity, the active brain areas are slightly different. The active brain areas of artistic-mindset students in creative processes are mainly in the frontal and occipital lobes; while the whole brain (frontal, oriental, temporal, and occipital lobes) was active in creative processes of engineering-mindset students. (3) During the whole creative process, the brain active level of artistic-mindset students was higher than that of engineering-mindset students. The results of this study fills gaps in existing research where only active brain areas and band waves were compared between artistic- and engineering-mindset students in creative processes. For quick thinking in terms of fluency of generating creative ideas, engineering students have an advantage in comparison to those from the visual arts. Also, the study provided more evidence that mindset can affect the active levels of the brain areas. Finally, this study provides educators with more insights on how to stimulate students' creative ability.
本研究旨在以高等教育学生为对象,通过 EEG 来理解和比较艺术和工程思维在创意过程中的差异。招募了 15 名美术硕士(MFA)视觉艺术专业和 15 名工程硕士(MEng)设计工程专业的学生,要求他们在佩戴 EEG 头戴设备的情况下完成替代用途任务。结果表明:(1)工程思维模式的学生比艺术思维模式的学生对创意想法的反应更快。(2)虽然在创意过程中,艺术思维和工程思维模式的学生都表现出θ波、α波和β波活动,但活跃的脑区略有不同。艺术思维模式学生在创意过程中的活跃脑区主要在前额和枕叶;而工程思维模式学生在创意过程中整个大脑(额、顶、颞、枕叶)都很活跃。(3)在整个创意过程中,艺术思维模式学生的大脑活跃水平高于工程思维模式学生。本研究的结果填补了现有研究的空白,即在创意过程中,仅比较了艺术思维和工程思维模式学生的活跃脑区和波段。在流畅地产生创意想法方面,工程学生比视觉艺术学生具有优势。此外,该研究提供了更多证据表明思维模式会影响大脑活跃区的水平。最后,本研究为教育工作者提供了更多关于如何激发学生创造力的见解。