• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在创造性过程中对具有艺术和工程思维方式的学生进行脑电图研究。

An EEG study on artistic and engineering mindsets in students in creative processes.

机构信息

Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Innovation, Technology, and Entrepreneurship, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63324-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-63324-0
PMID:38862597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11166918/
Abstract

This study aims to take higher-education students as examples to understand and compare artistic and engineering mindsets in creative processes using EEG. Fifteen Master of Fine Arts (MFA) visual arts and fifteen Master of Engineering (MEng) design engineering students were recruited and asked to complete alternative uses tasks wearing an EEG headset. The results revealed that (1) the engineering-mindset students responded to creative ideas faster than artistic-mindset students. (2) Although in creative processes both artistic- and engineering-mindset students showed Theta, Alpha, and Beta wave activity, the active brain areas are slightly different. The active brain areas of artistic-mindset students in creative processes are mainly in the frontal and occipital lobes; while the whole brain (frontal, oriental, temporal, and occipital lobes) was active in creative processes of engineering-mindset students. (3) During the whole creative process, the brain active level of artistic-mindset students was higher than that of engineering-mindset students. The results of this study fills gaps in existing research where only active brain areas and band waves were compared between artistic- and engineering-mindset students in creative processes. For quick thinking in terms of fluency of generating creative ideas, engineering students have an advantage in comparison to those from the visual arts. Also, the study provided more evidence that mindset can affect the active levels of the brain areas. Finally, this study provides educators with more insights on how to stimulate students' creative ability.

摘要

本研究旨在以高等教育学生为对象，通过 EEG 来理解和比较艺术和工程思维在创意过程中的差异。招募了 15 名美术硕士（MFA）视觉艺术专业和 15 名工程硕士（MEng）设计工程专业的学生，要求他们在佩戴 EEG 头戴设备的情况下完成替代用途任务。结果表明：（1）工程思维模式的学生比艺术思维模式的学生对创意想法的反应更快。（2）虽然在创意过程中，艺术思维和工程思维模式的学生都表现出θ波、α波和β波活动，但活跃的脑区略有不同。艺术思维模式学生在创意过程中的活跃脑区主要在前额和枕叶；而工程思维模式学生在创意过程中整个大脑（额、顶、颞、枕叶）都很活跃。（3）在整个创意过程中，艺术思维模式学生的大脑活跃水平高于工程思维模式学生。本研究的结果填补了现有研究的空白，即在创意过程中，仅比较了艺术思维和工程思维模式学生的活跃脑区和波段。在流畅地产生创意想法方面，工程学生比视觉艺术学生具有优势。此外，该研究提供了更多证据表明思维模式会影响大脑活跃区的水平。最后，本研究为教育工作者提供了更多关于如何激发学生创造力的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/0f3fcfe0c4af/41598_2024_63324_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/3543c088bd78/41598_2024_63324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/63dee894bd85/41598_2024_63324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/536a8dddaf6b/41598_2024_63324_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/d69df0fb7962/41598_2024_63324_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/bfa3a38a0b7d/41598_2024_63324_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/c35112d644fa/41598_2024_63324_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/0f3fcfe0c4af/41598_2024_63324_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/3543c088bd78/41598_2024_63324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/63dee894bd85/41598_2024_63324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/536a8dddaf6b/41598_2024_63324_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/d69df0fb7962/41598_2024_63324_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/bfa3a38a0b7d/41598_2024_63324_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/c35112d644fa/41598_2024_63324_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06ae/11166918/0f3fcfe0c4af/41598_2024_63324_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An EEG study on artistic and engineering mindsets in students in creative processes.在创造性过程中对具有艺术和工程思维方式的学生进行脑电图研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63324-0.
2
From growth and fixed creative mindsets to creative thinking: an investigation of the mediating role of creativity motivation.从成长型和固定型思维模式到创造性思维：创造力动机的中介作用研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 20;15:1353271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353271. eCollection 2024.
3
EEG signals respond differently to idea generation, idea evolution and evaluation in a loosely controlled creativity experiment.脑电图信号在一个松散控制的创造力实验中对创意生成、创意演变和评估的反应不同。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):2119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81655-0.
4
The creative brain: investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and FMRI.创造性大脑：通过脑电图（EEG）和功能磁共振成像（FMRI）对创造性解决问题过程中的大脑活动进行研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):734-48. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20538.
5
Creative Mindsets: Scale Validation in the Chinese Setting and Generalization to the Real Workplace.创造性思维模式：在中国背景下的量表验证及向实际工作场所的推广。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00463. eCollection 2020.
6
More creative ideas are associated with increased right posterior power and frontal-parietal/occipital coupling in the upper alpha band: A within-subjects study.更多创造性的想法与上 alpha 频段右后叶力量增加以及额顶/枕叶耦合增强有关：一项个体内研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Nov;181:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
7
Navigating creativity within arts-based pedagogy: Implications of a constructivist grounded theory study.艺术教学法中的创造力导航：建构主义扎根理论研究的启示。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Aug;91:104465. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104465. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
The Role of Metacognitive Strategy Monitoring and Control in the Relationship between Creative Mindsets and Divergent Thinking Performance.元认知策略监控与控制在创造性思维定式和发散性思维表现之间关系中的作用。
J Intell. 2022 Jun 16;10(2):35. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10020035.
9
What Are the Stages of the Creative Process? What Visual Art Students Are Saying.创作过程有哪些阶段？视觉艺术专业学生如是说。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 21;9:2266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02266. eCollection 2018.
10
The creative brain in the figural domain: Distinct patterns of EEG alpha power during idea generation and idea elaboration.在图形领域中的创造性大脑：在创意生成和创意阐述期间 EEG 阿尔法功率的独特模式。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding creativity process through electroencephalography measurement on creativity-related cognitive factors.通过对与创造力相关的认知因素进行脑电图测量来理解创造力过程。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 30;16:951272. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.951272. eCollection 2022.
2
The emergent properties of the connected brain.联网大脑的涌现特性。
Science. 2022 Nov 4;378(6619):505-510. doi: 10.1126/science.abq2591. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
The Creativity Diamond-A Framework to Aid Creativity.创造力菱形——一种辅助创造力的框架。
J Intell. 2022 Sep 22;10(4):73. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040073.
4
Adaptable and Robust EEG Bad Channel Detection Using Local Outlier Factor (LOF).基于局部离群因子（LOF）的自适应稳健 EEG 坏道检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;22(19):7314. doi: 10.3390/s22197314.
5
More creative ideas are associated with increased right posterior power and frontal-parietal/occipital coupling in the upper alpha band: A within-subjects study.更多创造性的想法与上 alpha 频段右后叶力量增加以及额顶/枕叶耦合增强有关：一项个体内研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Nov;181:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
6
An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability.对与创造力相关的语义记忆搜索的认知和神经相关性的调查。
Commun Biol. 2022 Jun 16;5(1):604. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03547-x.
7
Scientific thinking styles: The different ways of thinking in psychoanalytic case studies.科学思维方式：精神分析案例研究中的不同思维方式。
Int J Psychoanal. 2020 Oct;101(5):900-922. doi: 10.1080/00207578.2020.1796491. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
Classifying creativity: Applying machine learning techniques to divergent thinking EEG data.分类创造力：将机器学习技术应用于发散思维 EEG 数据。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:116990. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116990. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Humor comprehension and creative cognition: Shared and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms as indicated by EEG alpha activity.幽默理解和创造性认知：脑电图α活动表明的共享和独特的神经认知机制。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jun;213:116695. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116695. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
Learning from the parallel pathways of Makers to broaden pathways to engineering.借鉴创客的平行路径，拓宽通往工程学的路径。
Int J STEM Educ. 2018;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0098-8. Epub 2018 Mar 2.