• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分类创造力:将机器学习技术应用于发散思维 EEG 数据。

Classifying creativity: Applying machine learning techniques to divergent thinking EEG data.

机构信息

University of Arkansas, Department of Psychological Science, 480 Campus Drive, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.

University of Arkansas, Department of Psychological Science, 480 Campus Drive, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:116990. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116990. Epub 2020 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116990
PMID:32474083
Abstract

Prior research has shown that greater EEG alpha power (8-13 ​Hz) is characteristic of more creative individuals, and more creative task conditions. The present study investigated the potential for machine learning to classify more and less creative brain states. Participants completed an Alternate Uses Task, in which they thought of Normal or Uncommon (more creative) uses for everyday objects (e.g., brick). We hypothesized that alpha power would be greater for Uncommon (vs. Common) uses, and that a machine learning (ML) approach would enable the reliable classification data from the two conditions. Further, we expected that ML would be successful at classifying more (vs. less) creative individuals. As expected, alpha power was significantly greater for the Uncommon than for the Normal condition. Using spectrally weighted common spatial patterns to extract EEG features, and quadratic discriminant analysis, we found that classification accuracy for the two conditions varied widely among individuals, with a mean of 63.9%. For more vs. less creative individuals, 82.3% classification accuracy was attained. These findings indicate the potential for broader adoption of machine learning in creativity research.

摘要

先前的研究表明,更大的脑电图阿尔法功率(8-13 赫兹)是更具创造力的个体的特征,也是更具创造性的任务条件的特征。本研究探讨了机器学习对分类更多和更少创造性大脑状态的潜力。参与者完成了交替用途任务,他们需要思考日常物体(例如砖头)的正常或不常见(更具创造性)用途。我们假设,阿尔法功率对于不常见(与常见相比)用途会更大,并且机器学习(ML)方法将能够可靠地对两种情况下的数据进行分类。此外,我们预计 ML 将能够成功地对更多(与更少)创造性个体进行分类。正如预期的那样,阿尔法功率对于不常见条件显著大于常见条件。使用频谱加权的公共空间模式来提取 EEG 特征和二次判别分析,我们发现两种条件的分类准确性在个体之间差异很大,平均值为 63.9%。对于更多与更少创造性的个体,达到了 82.3%的分类准确性。这些发现表明机器学习在创造力研究中的更广泛应用的潜力。

相似文献

1
Classifying creativity: Applying machine learning techniques to divergent thinking EEG data.分类创造力:将机器学习技术应用于发散思维 EEG 数据。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:116990. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116990. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
EEG signals respond differently to idea generation, idea evolution and evaluation in a loosely controlled creativity experiment.脑电图信号在一个松散控制的创造力实验中对创意生成、创意演变和评估的反应不同。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):2119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81655-0.
3
The creative brain in the figural domain: Distinct patterns of EEG alpha power during idea generation and idea elaboration.在图形领域中的创造性大脑:在创意生成和创意阐述期间 EEG 阿尔法功率的独特模式。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
EEG alpha power and creative ideation.脑电图α波功率与创造性思维
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jul;44(100):111-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.12.002. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
5
Everyday Creativity is Associated with Increased Frontal Electroencephalography Alpha Activity During Creative Ideation.日常创造力与创意构思期间额叶脑电图 α 活动增加有关。
Neuroscience. 2022 Nov 1;503:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
6
Tackling creativity at its roots: evidence for different patterns of EEG α activity related to convergent and divergent modes of task processing.从根源上解决创造力问题:与任务处理的聚合和发散模式相关的 EEGα 活动的不同模式的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 May;84(2):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
7
Creativity is associated with a characteristic U-shaped function of alpha power changes accompanied by an early increase in functional coupling.创造力与α波功率变化的典型U形函数相关,同时伴随着功能耦合的早期增加。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):1012-1021. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00699-y.
8
Humor comprehension and creative cognition: Shared and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms as indicated by EEG alpha activity.幽默理解和创造性认知:脑电图α活动表明的共享和独特的神经认知机制。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jun;213:116695. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116695. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
More creative ideas are associated with increased right posterior power and frontal-parietal/occipital coupling in the upper alpha band: A within-subjects study.更多创造性的想法与上 alpha 频段右后叶力量增加以及额顶/枕叶耦合增强有关:一项个体内研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Nov;181:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
EEG alpha activity is moderated by the serial order effect during divergent thinking.脑电图阿尔法活动在发散思维过程中受序列顺序效应的调节。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Jul;145:84-95. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the neural basis of creativity: EEG analysis of power spectrum and functional connectivity during creative tasks in school-aged children.探索创造力的神经基础:学龄儿童在创造性任务期间的脑电图功率谱和功能连接分析
Front Comput Neurosci. 2025 Mar 12;19:1548620. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2025.1548620. eCollection 2025.
2
Hidden Brain States Reveal the Temporal Dynamics of Neural Oscillations During Metaphor Generation and Their Role in Verbal Creativity.隐藏的脑状态揭示隐喻生成过程中神经振荡的时间动态及其在语言创造力中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70023. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70023.
3
Flexibility of intrinsic neural timescales during distinct behavioral states.
不同行为状态下内在神经时间尺度的灵活性。
Commun Biol. 2024 Dec 19;7(1):1667. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07349-1.
4
A Machine Learning Approach to Classifying EEG Data Collected with or without Haptic Feedback during a Simulated Drilling Task.一种用于对模拟钻孔任务中有无触觉反馈时收集的脑电图(EEG)数据进行分类的机器学习方法。
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 31;14(9):894. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090894.
5
EEG-based study of design creativity: a review on research design, experiments, and analysis.基于脑电图的设计创造力研究:关于研究设计、实验与分析的综述
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug 1;18:1331396. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1331396. eCollection 2024.
6
An EEG study on artistic and engineering mindsets in students in creative processes.在创造性过程中对具有艺术和工程思维方式的学生进行脑电图研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63324-0.
7
Impacts of Cognitive Factors on Creativity Quality in Design: Identification from Performances in Recall, Association and Combination.认知因素对设计创造力质量的影响:从回忆、联想和组合表现中识别
J Intell. 2023 Feb 20;11(2):39. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11020039.
8
Understanding creativity process through electroencephalography measurement on creativity-related cognitive factors.通过对与创造力相关的认知因素进行脑电图测量来理解创造力过程。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 30;16:951272. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.951272. eCollection 2022.
9
Design Meets Neuroscience: An Electroencephalogram Study of Design Thinking in Concept Generation Phase.设计与神经科学相遇:概念生成阶段设计思维的脑电图研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;13:832194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832194. eCollection 2022.
10
Decoding motor expertise from fine-tuned oscillatory network organization.从微调的振荡网络组织中解码运动专长。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jun 15;43(9):2817-2832. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25818. Epub 2022 Mar 11.