Budolfson Mark, Dennig Francis, Fleurbaey Marc, Scovronick Noah, Siebert Asher, Spears Dean, Wagner Fabian
Philosophy Department at the University of Vermont.
Yale-NUS College in Singapore.
World Bank Econ Rev. 2019 Feb;33(1):21-40. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhx016. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
How much should the present generations sacrifice to reduce emissions today, in order to reduce the future harms of climate change? Within climate economics, debate on this question has been focused on so-called "ethical parameters" of social time preference and inequality aversion. We show that optimal climate policy similarly importantly depends on the future of the developing world. In particular, although global poverty is falling and the economic lives of the poor are improving worldwide, leading models of climate economics may be too optimistic about two central predictions: future population growth in poor countries, and future convergence in total factor productivity (TFP). We report results of small modifications to a standard model: under plausible scenarios for high future population growth (especially in sub-Saharan Africa) and for low future TFP convergence, we find that optimal near-term carbon taxes could be substantially larger.
为了减少气候变化在未来造成的危害,当代人应该做出多大的牺牲来减少当前的排放?在气候经济学领域,关于这个问题的辩论一直集中在社会时间偏好和不平等厌恶等所谓的“伦理参数”上。我们表明,最优气候政策同样重要地取决于发展中世界的未来。特别是,尽管全球贫困率在下降,世界各地穷人的经济生活在改善,但气候经济学的主流模型可能对两个核心预测过于乐观:贫穷国家未来的人口增长,以及全要素生产率(TFP)未来的趋同。我们报告了对一个标准模型进行小幅修改的结果:在未来人口高增长(特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲)和未来TFP低趋同的合理情景下,我们发现最优的近期碳税可能会大幅提高。