• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气候缓解政策与冲突的潜在路径:勾勒一项研究议程。

Climate mitigation policies and the potential pathways to conflict: Outlining a research agenda.

作者信息

Gilmore Elisabeth A, Buhaug Halvard

机构信息

Department of International Development, Community, and Environment Clark University Worcester Massachusetts USA.

Peace Research Institute Oslo Oslo Norway.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2021 Sep-Oct;12(5):e722. doi: 10.1002/wcc.722. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1002/wcc.722
PMID:34594401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8459245/
Abstract

Climate policies will need to incentivize transformative societal changes if they are to achieve emission reductions consistent with 1.5°C temperature targets. To contribute to efforts for aligning climate policy with broader societal goals, specifically those related to sustainable development, we identify the effects of climate mitigation policy on aspects of socioeconomic development that are known determinants of conflict and evaluate the plausibility and importance of potential pathways to armed conflict and political violence. Conditional on preexisting societal tensions and socioeconomic vulnerabilities, we isolate effects on economic performance, income and livelihood, food and energy prices, and land tenure as most likely to increase conflict risks. Climate policy designs may be critical to moderate these risks as different designs can promote more favorable societal outcomes such as equity and inclusion. Coupling research with careful monitoring and evaluation of the intermediate societal effects at early stages of policy implementation will be a critical part of learning and moderating potential conflict risks. Importantly, better characterizing the future conflict risks under climate policy allows for a more comprehensive comparison to the conflict risk if mitigation is not implemented and graver climate damages are experienced. This article is categorized under:The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Benefits of Mitigation.

摘要

如果气候政策要实现与1.5°C温度目标相一致的减排,就需要激励社会发生变革。为推动气候政策与更广泛的社会目标(特别是与可持续发展相关的目标)保持一致,我们确定了气候缓解政策对社会经济发展各方面的影响,这些方面是已知的冲突决定因素,并评估了通向武装冲突和政治暴力的潜在途径的合理性和重要性。在既有的社会紧张局势和社会经济脆弱性的条件下,我们确定对经济表现、收入和生计、食品和能源价格以及土地保有权的影响最有可能增加冲突风险。气候政策设计对于缓解这些风险可能至关重要,因为不同的设计可以促进更有利的社会成果,如公平和包容。将研究与政策实施早期对中间社会影响的仔细监测和评估相结合,将是了解和缓解潜在冲突风险的关键部分。重要的是,更好地描述气候政策下未来的冲突风险,有助于与不实施缓解措施且遭受更严重气候破坏时的冲突风险进行更全面的比较。本文分类如下:碳经济与气候缓解>缓解的好处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66eb/8459245/56b1c47a6ddd/WCC-12-e722-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66eb/8459245/56b1c47a6ddd/WCC-12-e722-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66eb/8459245/56b1c47a6ddd/WCC-12-e722-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Climate mitigation policies and the potential pathways to conflict: Outlining a research agenda.气候缓解政策与冲突的潜在路径:勾勒一项研究议程。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2021 Sep-Oct;12(5):e722. doi: 10.1002/wcc.722. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
4
Australian policies on water management and climate change: are they supporting the sustainable development goals and improved health and well-being?澳大利亚的水管理和气候变化政策:它们是否支持可持续发展目标以及改善健康和福祉?
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0509-3.
5
Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs.造林减缓气候变化:潜力、风险与权衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1576-1591. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14887. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Role of climate goals and clean-air policies on reducing future air pollution deaths in China: a modelling study.气候目标和清洁空气政策在减少中国未来空气污染死亡人数中的作用:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Feb;6(2):e92-e99. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00326-0.
7
Assessment of mitigation strategies as tools for risk management under future uncertainties: a multi-model approach.评估缓解策略作为未来不确定性下风险管理工具:一种多模型方法。
Sustain Sci. 2018;13(2):329-349. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0521-6. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.空气污染的健康协同效益和《巴黎协定》的缓解成本:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector.农业、林业和其他土地利用(AFOLU)部门温室气体减排的协同效益、权衡取舍、障碍和政策。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3270-90. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12591. Epub 2014 May 8.
10
Climate change and eHealth: a promising strategy for health sector mitigation and adaptation.气候变化与电子健康:卫生部门缓解和适应的有前景策略。
Glob Health Action. 2012;5. doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.18428. Epub 2012 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal Climate Policy and the Future of World Economic Development.最优气候政策与世界经济发展的未来。
World Bank Econ Rev. 2019 Feb;33(1):21-40. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhx016. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
2
The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change.航空业的全球规模、分布及增长:对气候变化的影响。
Glob Environ Change. 2020 Nov;65:102194. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
3
Making sense of the politics in the climate change loss & damage debate.理解气候变化损失与损害辩论中的政治因素。
Glob Environ Change. 2020 Sep;64:102133. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102133.
4
Government effectiveness and institutions as determinants of tropical cyclone mortality.政府效能和制度对热带气旋死亡率的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 17;117(46):28692-28699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006213117. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
COVID-19 recovery funds dwarf clean energy investment needs.新冠疫情复苏资金使清洁能源投资需求相形见绌。
Science. 2020 Oct 16;370(6514):298-300. doi: 10.1126/science.abc9697.
6
Directions for Research on Climate and Conflict.气候与冲突研究指南。
Earths Future. 2020 Jul;8(7):e2020EF001532. doi: 10.1029/2020EF001532. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
7
Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality.气候计量经济学模型表明,太阳地球工程将减少国家间的收入不平等。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 13;11(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13957-x.
8
Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?收益循环能否使有效的碳税在政治上可行?
Sci Adv. 2019 Sep 18;5(9):eaax3323. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax3323. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict.气候作为武装冲突的一个风险因素。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7764):193-197. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1300-6. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict.气候变化与冲突方面的研究与政策桥梁搭建
Curr Clim Change Rep. 2018;4(4):313-319. doi: 10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9. Epub 2018 Oct 27.