Department of Developmental Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
J Pineal Res. 2024 Aug;76(5):e12985. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12985.
Previous studies have reported inconsistent results about exogenous melatonin's sleep-promoting effects. A possible explanation relies on the heterogeneity in administration schedule and dose, which might be accountable for differences in treatment efficacy. In this paper, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized controlled trials performed on patients with insomnia and healthy volunteers, evaluating the effect of melatonin administration on sleep-related parameters. The standardized mean difference between treatment and placebo groups in terms of sleep onset latency and total sleep time were used as outcomes. Dose-response and meta-regression models were estimated to explore how time of administration, dose, and other treatment-related parameters might affect exogenous melatonin's efficacy. We included 26 randomized controlled trials published between 1987 and 2020, for a total of 1689 observations. Dose-response meta-analysis showed that melatonin gradually reduces sleep onset latency and increases total sleep time, peaking at 4 mg/day. Meta-regression models showed that insomnia status (β = 0.50, p < 0.001) and time between treatment administration and the sleep episode (β = -0.16, p = 0.023) were significant predictors of sleep onset latency, while the time of day (β = -0.086, p < 0.01) was the only significant predictor of total sleep time. Our results suggest that advancing the timing of administration (3 h before the desired bedtime) and increasing the administered dose (4 mg/day), as compared to the exogenous melatonin schedule most used in clinical practice (2 mg 30 min before the desired bedtime), might optimize the efficacy of exogenous melatonin in promoting sleep.
先前的研究报告显示,外源性褪黑素促进睡眠的效果结果不一致。一种可能的解释是基于给药方案和剂量的异质性,这可能是治疗效果差异的原因。在本文中,我们对失眠症患者和健康志愿者进行的双盲、随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,评估了褪黑素给药对睡眠相关参数的影响。以睡眠潜伏期和总睡眠时间的治疗组与安慰剂组之间的标准化均数差作为结果。估计剂量-反应和荟萃回归模型,以探讨给药时间、剂量和其他与治疗相关的参数如何影响外源性褪黑素的疗效。我们纳入了 1987 年至 2020 年期间发表的 26 项随机对照试验,共有 1689 个观察结果。剂量-反应荟萃分析表明,褪黑素逐渐降低睡眠潜伏期并增加总睡眠时间,在 4mg/天达到峰值。荟萃回归模型表明,失眠状态(β=0.50,p<0.001)和治疗给药与睡眠发作之间的时间(β=-0.16,p=0.023)是睡眠潜伏期的显著预测因子,而一天中的时间(β=-0.086,p<0.01)是总睡眠时间的唯一显著预测因子。我们的结果表明,与临床实践中最常使用的外源性褪黑素方案(2mg 在期望就寝时间前 30 分钟给药)相比,提前给药时间(在期望就寝时间前 3 小时给药)和增加给药剂量(4mg/天)可能会优化外源性褪黑素促进睡眠的疗效。