Ellen R P, Grove D A
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 May;21(5):850-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.850-853.1985.
A previous observation, using a few representative laboratory strains, that rabbit antisera raised against isolated surface fibrils might be useful in identifying Actinomyces viscosus and Actinomyces naeslundii isolates to their correct numerical taxonomy clusters was reexamined with a large culture collection, including clinical isolates from three different laboratories. Strains were first identified by a slower standard procedure, including agglutination with anti-whole-cell antisera, catalase test, and gas and paper chromatography as needed. Indirect immunofluorescence tests indicated that antisera raised against fibrils of strains representing the three principal taxonomic clusters could separate most strains into their correct clusters. The antisera were particularly successful in separating two taxonomically distinct groups of A. naeslundii, clusters 3 and 5, but could not separate A. viscosus belonging to the principal cluster (no. 1) and minor clusters (no. 2, 4, 6).
先前使用少数几种具有代表性的实验室菌株进行的一项观察发现,针对分离出的表面纤丝产生的兔抗血清可能有助于将黏性放线菌和内氏放线菌分离株鉴定到其正确的数值分类学聚类中。现使用一个大型培养物收集库,包括来自三个不同实验室的临床分离株,对这一观察结果进行了重新检验。菌株首先通过一种较慢的标准程序进行鉴定,包括用抗全细胞抗血清进行凝集试验、过氧化氢酶试验以及根据需要进行气相色谱和纸色谱分析。间接免疫荧光试验表明,针对代表三个主要分类学聚类的菌株纤丝产生的抗血清可将大多数菌株正确地分到各自的聚类中。这些抗血清在区分内氏放线菌两个分类学上不同的组,即聚类3和聚类5时特别成功,但无法区分属于主要聚类(第1号)和次要聚类(第2、4、6号)的黏性放线菌。