• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响装甲车辆乘员态势感知的因素。

Factors Affecting the Situational Awareness of Armored Vehicle Occupants.

机构信息

School of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100091, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;24(11):3688. doi: 10.3390/s24113688.

DOI:10.3390/s24113688
PMID:38894477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11175271/
Abstract

In the field of armored vehicles, up to 70% of accidents are associated with low levels of situational awareness among the occupants, highlighting the importance of situational awareness in improving task performance. In this study, we explored the mechanisms influencing situational awareness by simulating an armored vehicle driving platform with 14 levels of experimentation in terms of five factors: experience, expectations, attention, the cueing channel, and automation. The experimental data included SART and SAGAT questionnaire scores, eye movement indicators, and electrocardiographic and electrodermal signals. Data processing and analysis revealed the following conclusions: (1) Experienced operators have higher levels of situational awareness. (2) Operators with certain expectations have lower levels of situational awareness. (3) Situational awareness levels are negatively correlated with information importance affiliations and the frequency of anomalous information in non-primary tasks. (4) Dual-channel cues lead to higher levels of situational awareness than single-channel cues. (5) Operators' situational awareness is lower at high automation levels.

摘要

在装甲车辆领域，高达 70%的事故与乘员的低态势感知水平有关，这凸显了态势感知在提高任务绩效方面的重要性。在这项研究中，我们通过模拟装甲车辆驾驶平台，以经验、期望、注意力、提示通道和自动化五个因素进行了 14 级实验，探讨了影响态势感知的机制。实验数据包括 SART 和 SAGAT 问卷得分、眼动指标以及心电图和皮肤电信号。数据处理和分析得出以下结论：(1) 有经验的操作员具有更高的态势感知水平。(2) 具有特定期望的操作员具有较低的态势感知水平。(3) 态势感知水平与信息重要性关联和非主要任务中异常信息的频率呈负相关。(4) 双通道提示比单通道提示导致更高的态势感知水平。(5) 操作员在高自动化水平下的态势感知水平较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/b16ab57e6f4d/sensors-24-03688-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/611c31107c83/sensors-24-03688-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/daecb3270cca/sensors-24-03688-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/fca3cd5d83f3/sensors-24-03688-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/a955538246a8/sensors-24-03688-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/435a1216d9b5/sensors-24-03688-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/44b1f7beeff8/sensors-24-03688-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/ab154985323f/sensors-24-03688-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/f4748b2a48d1/sensors-24-03688-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/92bac4fc4472/sensors-24-03688-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/96d8be806245/sensors-24-03688-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/9f0fcedba918/sensors-24-03688-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/217e449939fa/sensors-24-03688-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/26c0bb2a66b9/sensors-24-03688-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/7ad84d3a0844/sensors-24-03688-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/f92883300ff0/sensors-24-03688-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/96ebeafa0af2/sensors-24-03688-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/112c2b50b193/sensors-24-03688-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/bcb0a4941174/sensors-24-03688-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/8e928608debd/sensors-24-03688-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/bdd820d3208a/sensors-24-03688-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/0dd015e73b87/sensors-24-03688-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/b16ab57e6f4d/sensors-24-03688-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/611c31107c83/sensors-24-03688-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/daecb3270cca/sensors-24-03688-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/fca3cd5d83f3/sensors-24-03688-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/a955538246a8/sensors-24-03688-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/435a1216d9b5/sensors-24-03688-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/44b1f7beeff8/sensors-24-03688-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/ab154985323f/sensors-24-03688-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/f4748b2a48d1/sensors-24-03688-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/92bac4fc4472/sensors-24-03688-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/96d8be806245/sensors-24-03688-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/9f0fcedba918/sensors-24-03688-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/217e449939fa/sensors-24-03688-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/26c0bb2a66b9/sensors-24-03688-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/7ad84d3a0844/sensors-24-03688-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/f92883300ff0/sensors-24-03688-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/96ebeafa0af2/sensors-24-03688-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/112c2b50b193/sensors-24-03688-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/bcb0a4941174/sensors-24-03688-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/8e928608debd/sensors-24-03688-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/bdd820d3208a/sensors-24-03688-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/0dd015e73b87/sensors-24-03688-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3059/11175271/b16ab57e6f4d/sensors-24-03688-g022.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Affecting the Situational Awareness of Armored Vehicle Occupants.影响装甲车辆乘员态势感知的因素。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;24(11):3688. doi: 10.3390/s24113688.
2
The effect of a secondary task on drivers' gap acceptance and situational awareness at junctions.次要任务对驾驶员路口会车接受度和情境意识的影响。
Ergonomics. 2021 Feb;64(2):184-198. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1822548. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.有效线索可加速年轻驾驶员在条件自动化期间后转移控制权的时间。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul;116:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Cross-task cue utilisation and situational awareness in simulated air traffic control.模拟空中交通管制中的跨任务线索利用和态势感知。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jan;74:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving.利用眼动追踪技术研究接管前视觉接触对自动驾驶中情境意识的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106143. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106143. Epub 2021 May 16.
6
Dual task interference during walking: The effects of texting on situational awareness and gait stability.行走过程中的双重任务干扰：发短信对情境意识和步态稳定性的影响。
Gait Posture. 2015 Oct;42(4):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.07.060. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces.自动化透明度：不确定性沟通对人机交互和界面的影响。
Ergonomics. 2019 Mar;62(3):345-360. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1547842. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
8
Will visual cues help alleviating motion sickness in automated cars? A review article.视觉提示能否缓解自动驾驶汽车中的晕车症状？一篇综述文章。
Ergonomics. 2024 Jun;67(6):772-800. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2286187. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
9
Towards a conceptual model of motorcyclists' Risk Awareness: a comparative study of riding experience effect on hazard detection and situational criticality assessment.面向摩托车手风险意识的概念模型：骑行经验对危险察觉和情境临界性评估影响的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
Cross-task cue utilisation and situational awareness in learning to manage a simulated rail control task.跨任务线索利用与情境意识在模拟轨道控制任务学习中的作用。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Nov;89:103216. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103216. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Situation Awareness Measurement in Remotely Controlled Cars.遥控汽车中的态势感知测量
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 20;12:592930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.592930. eCollection 2021.
2
Do paramedic students have situational awareness during high-fidelity simulation? A mixed-methods pilot study.急救专业学生在高仿真模拟中是否具有情境意识？一项混合方法的初步研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 May;56:100983. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.100983. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Physiological Measurements of Situation Awareness: A Systematic Review.态势感知的生理测量：系统综述
Hum Factors. 2023 Aug;65(5):737-758. doi: 10.1177/0018720820969071. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
Effects of Information Availability on Command-and-Control Decision Making: Performance, Trust, and Situation Awareness.信息可用性对指挥与控制决策的影响：绩效、信任与态势感知
Hum Factors. 2016 Mar;58(2):301-21. doi: 10.1177/0018720815619515. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine sustained by soldiers in vehicles attacked by improvised explosive devices.车辆遭简易爆炸装置袭击时，车内士兵所受的胸腰椎骨折。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2400-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7e585.
6
Shifting visual attention in space: an electrophysiological analysis using high spatial resolution mapping.空间中视觉注意力的转移：一项使用高空间分辨率图谱的电生理分析。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Jul;111(7):1241-57. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00313-8.