Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua, 500, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 5;14(1):15491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66468-1.
Our study aims to compare the efficacy of oral antidiabetic therapy to early insulinization on glycemic control among newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients in real-world clinical practice. A retrospective cohort study conducted at a medical center in Taiwan analyzed 1256 eligible patients from January 2007 to December 2017. Propensity score matching resulted in well-balanced groups of 94 patients each in the oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) and early insulinization cohorts. Glycemic outcomes were assessed in both groups. Patients exclusively using OAD showed consistently lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months compared to insulin users. At later periods, 77.7% of OAD users achieved glycemic control versus 64.9% of insulin users, with a marginally significant difference. Subgroup analyses suggested a trend favoring well-controlled diabetes in the OAD group, though not statistically significant. Our study finds oral antidiabetic therapy is not inferior to early insulinization for glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients, irrespective of initial HbA1c levels. This supports oral therapy as a rational treatment option, even in cases with elevated HbA1c at diagnosis.
我们的研究旨在比较口服降糖药物治疗与早期胰岛素强化治疗在真实世界临床实践中新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的疗效。在台湾的一家医学中心进行的回顾性队列研究分析了 2007 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间的 1256 名符合条件的患者。通过倾向评分匹配,口服降糖药物(OAD)组和早期胰岛素化组各有 94 名患者的特征均衡。在两组中评估了血糖结局。与胰岛素使用者相比,仅使用 OAD 的患者在 3、12、24 和 36 个月时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平始终较低。在后期,OAD 使用者中有 77.7%达到了血糖控制,而胰岛素使用者中有 64.9%,差异具有统计学意义。亚组分析表明,OAD 组的糖尿病控制良好的趋势更为明显,但无统计学意义。我们的研究发现,对于新诊断的 2 型糖尿病患者,无论初始 HbA1c 水平如何,口服降糖药物治疗在血糖控制方面并不逊于早期胰岛素强化治疗。这支持口服治疗作为一种合理的治疗选择,即使在诊断时 HbA1c 升高的情况下也是如此。