van Mark Anke, Hallstein Tim, Holzgreve Fabian, Groneberg David A, Ohlendorf Daniela
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 17;14(7):e079094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079094.
There has not been a theoretical test run in Germany that compares different navigation systems with an industry solution (MapTrip112). The aim of this study was to compare navigation systems to elucidate whether the emergency response time (ERT) was reduced and, consequently, whether the adherence to the travel time improved.
Prospective, simulation study, cross-sectional study.
Offices of the Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt (60 590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany). The situation-adaptable industry navigation solution MapTrip112 was tested in its 'Lights and Siren(s) (L&S)' mode in comparison to the TomTom and Google Maps navigation systems. MapTrip112 was set to calculate a route that takes special emergency rights of way into account.
All three navigation systems simultaneously calculated the distances and durations of fictitious routes. Three scenarios were tested: the University Hospital Frankfurt (60 596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and the Central Fire Station 1 (60435 Frankfurt am Main, Germany) served as the starting points for the urban routes, while the Odenwald Health Centre (64 711 Erbach, Germany) served as the starting point for rural routes. The routes' endpoints were arbitrarily chosen locations inside the customary operational radius. The routes were selected for short and long distances as well as for different periods, including weekdays, weekends and evening rush hour (4-7 pm), in the German cities of Frankfurt am Main and Odenwaldkreis (Southern Hesse).
The time and distance were calculated for a total of 4650 trips. When comparing travel times and distances between rural and urban areas as well as between weekdays and weekends, statistically significant results were obtained (p<0.001). With time advantages ranging from 23.5 s to 300.5 s (4.75% to 50% of the travel time) on weekdays and weekends, MapTrip112 consistently outperformed both TomTom and Google Maps. For city missions, MapTrip112 achieved time gains of up to 50% over its competitors, with significant advantages during the rush hours and around specific locations such as the University Hospital Frankfurt and Fire Station 1.
MapTrip112 always achieved the fastest routes although these were not always accompanied by a shortened distance. These findings underscore MapTrip112's superiority in providing efficient routing solutions across various scenarios. For this reason, the use of this software should be considered in practice and investigated in real-world conditions in further studies.
在德国尚未进行过将不同导航系统与一种行业解决方案(MapTrip112)进行比较的理论测试运行。本研究的目的是比较各导航系统,以阐明应急响应时间(ERT)是否缩短,以及出行时间的遵守情况是否因此得到改善。
前瞻性模拟研究、横断面研究。
歌德大学法兰克福分校职业医学、社会医学与环境医学研究所办公室(德国美因河畔法兰克福60590)。将可根据情况调整的行业导航解决方案MapTrip112设置为“警灯和警报器(L&S)”模式,与TomTom和谷歌地图导航系统进行比较。MapTrip112被设置为计算一条考虑特殊紧急通行权的路线。
所有三种导航系统同时计算虚拟路线的距离和时长。测试了三种场景:法兰克福大学医院(德国美因河畔法兰克福60596)和中央消防站1(德国美因河畔法兰克福60435)作为城市路线的起点,而奥登瓦尔德健康中心(德国埃尔巴赫64711)作为农村路线的起点。路线的终点是在常规作业半径内任意选择的地点。在德国美因河畔法兰克福市和奥登瓦尔德县(黑森州南部),针对不同时段(包括工作日、周末和傍晚高峰时段(下午4点至7点))以及长短不同的距离选择了路线。
总共计算了4650次行程的时间和距离。比较农村和城市地区以及工作日和周末之间的出行时间和距离时,获得了具有统计学意义的结果(p<0.001)。在工作日和周末,MapTrip112始终优于TomTom和谷歌地图,时间优势在23.5秒至300.5秒之间(占出行时间的4.75%至50%)。对于城市任务,MapTrip112比其竞争对手实现了高达50%的时间增益,在高峰时段以及法兰克福大学医院和消防站1等特定地点周围具有显著优势。
MapTrip112始终能规划出最快的路线,尽管这些路线并不总是距离最短。这些发现凸显了MapTrip112在提供各种场景下高效路线规划解决方案方面的优势。因此,在实际应用中应考虑使用该软件,并在进一步研究中在实际条件下进行调查。