Gasiewski Kristina, Weiss Mary Jane, Leaf Justin B, Labowitz Jennifer
Endicott College, Beverly, MA USA.
Melmark, 2600 Wayland Road, Berwyn, PA 19312 USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jul 22;14(4):1209-1222. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00619-y. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Interdisciplinary collaboration is challenging, but necessary, to meet the needs of individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Among the dyadic interactions in interdisciplinary teams, the relationships between occupational therapy practitioners and board certified behavior analysts are uniquely challenging. The disciplines define evidence-based practice differently and approach intervention from different angles. Furthermore, there are fundamental differences in worldview between the disciplines. Both disciplines offer necessary treatment, and successful collaboration between these disciplines is essential for maximizing outcomes. Hence, finding ways to help bridge the gap between these professions, in particular, is essential. Common barriers to developing collaborative alliances include misperceptions of the other discipline, differences in terminology, and unprofessional behavior. This article reviews the history and foundational concepts of both disciplines, and the common approaches associated with each. In addition, models of collaboration are discussed, with suggestions for enhancing interdisciplinary communication and treatment. Successful collaborative treatment is predicated on an understanding of the value and expertise offered by different disciplines, and requires mutual respect and professional dialogue.
跨学科合作对于满足自闭症谱系障碍患者的需求而言具有挑战性,但却是必要的。在跨学科团队的二元互动中,职业治疗师与获得认证的行为分析师之间的关系尤其具有挑战性。这两个学科对循证实践的定义不同,且从不同角度进行干预。此外,这两个学科在世界观上存在根本差异。两个学科都提供必要的治疗,这些学科之间的成功合作对于实现最佳治疗效果至关重要。因此,尤其重要的是找到方法来弥合这些专业之间的差距。建立合作联盟的常见障碍包括对其他学科的误解、术语差异和不专业行为。本文回顾了这两个学科的历史和基础概念,以及与之相关的常见方法。此外,还讨论了合作模式,并提出了加强跨学科沟通和治疗的建议。成功的合作治疗基于对不同学科所提供的价值和专业知识的理解,并且需要相互尊重和专业对话。