Department of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Fırat University, Elaziğ, Turkey.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024 Jun;33(2):e2031. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2031.
The aim of this study was to develop the Motivations for Coping After Disaster Scale. To test the construct validity of the scale, a total of 676 data were collected from three different sampling groups (N1: 388; N2: 194; N3: 94).
Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Criterion validity analysis were conducted to test the construct validity of the scale.
As a result of CFA, it was seen that the post-disaster scale had a five-dimensional structure (spiritual values, hope, friend support, solidarity, family support). The loadings of the items of the scale are at a good level. As a result of CFA, the scale was found to have acceptable and good fit indices (χ/sd = 2.690; RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) = 0.066; SRMR (Standardized Root Mean Square Residual) = 0.047; CFI (Comparative Fit Index) = 0.948; GFI (Goodness of Fit Index) = 0.917). The results of the criterion validity analysis show that the scale has criterion validity. Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient shows that the scale is highly reliable (Total = 0.923).
The results of this study show that the Post-Disaster Coping Motivations Scale is a valid and reliable instrument. It is thought that the scale can make an important contribution to understanding psychological recovery processes after disaster and providing appropriate support to individuals.
本研究旨在编制《灾难后应对动机量表》。为了检验该量表的建构效度，共从三个不同的抽样组收集了 676 份数据（N1：388；N2：194；N3：94）。
采用探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析（CFA）和效标效度分析对量表的建构效度进行检验。
CFA 结果表明，灾难后量表具有五维结构（精神价值观、希望、朋友支持、团结、家庭支持）。量表各条目的负荷值处于良好水平。CFA 结果表明，该量表具有可接受的和良好的拟合指数（χ/sd=2.690；RMSEA（近似均方根误差）=0.066；SRMR（标准化均方根残差）=0.047；CFI（比较拟合指数）=0.948；GFI（拟合优度指数）=0.917）。效标效度分析结果表明，该量表具有效标效度。Cronbach Alpha 内部一致性系数表明该量表高度可靠（总分为 0.923）。
本研究结果表明，《灾难后应对动机量表》是一种有效且可靠的工具。该量表可以为理解灾难后的心理恢复过程和为个体提供适当的支持做出重要贡献。
