Ploesser Markus, Martin David
Fakultät für Gesundheit (Department für Humanmedizin), Lehrstuhl für Medizintheorie, Integrative und Anthroposophische Medizin, Herdecke, Germany.
J Integr Complement Med. 2024 Dec;30(12):1162-1178. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0328. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
Currently, no systematic evidence synthesis of the mechanism of action of mindfulness-based approaches exists for pain conditions. To identify and synthesize experimental and clinical studies examining aspects of the mechanism of action of mindfulness for pain relief. The following databases and search interfaces were searched: Embase (via Embase.com) and Medline (via PubMed). Additional references were identified via bibliographies of included studies. The following were the inclusion criteria applied: (1) original studies published in peer-reviewed journals, (2) in adult populations that (3) examined the mechanism of action of mindfulness meditation on pain outcomes or (4) provided conclusions regarding the potential mechanism of action of mindfulness meditation. The studies were selected by two independent reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. A total of 21 studies published in English met the inclusion criteria, of which 5 studies were clinical studies, which included patients with chronic pain, and 16 studies used experimental pain induction. The investigation into brain mechanisms through functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging revealed mindfulness meditation's ability to modulate brain activity, particularly in the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and orbitofrontal cortex, and to enhance structural and functional connectivity in regions associated with pain perception. Regarding the role of opioids, findings across five studies indicated that the analgesic effects of mindfulness are maintained even when opioid receptors are blocked, suggesting a nonopioidergic pathway for pain modulation. Pain perception studies highlighted that mindfulness practices foster pain acceptance and modify pain control beliefs, serving as key mediators in improving pain outcomes. For experienced versus novice mindfulness practitioners, results demonstrated that long-term practice enhances pain threshold and reduces pain unpleasantness through increased activity in salience and attentional control regions. This systematic review highlights mindfulness meditation as a multifaceted approach to pain management, utilizing mechanisms such as cognitive and emotional reappraisal, nonopioidergic pathways, and enhanced attention in control regions. It emphasizes the role of mindfulness in fostering pain acceptance and altering pain control perceptions, showcasing its broad impact on the neurological and experiential dimensions of pain. However, the predominance of studies on healthy subjects and methodological variations across experiments necessitates careful interpretation of the findings. The review calls for further research to explore the mechanisms of mindfulness in chronic pain populations more deeply, distinguishing the specific effects of mindfulness from nonspecific effects and expanding its applicability in clinical settings for chronic pain management.
目前,对于疼痛病症,尚无关于正念疗法作用机制的系统性证据综述。旨在识别并综合审视正念疗法缓解疼痛作用机制各方面的实验性和临床研究。检索了以下数据库和搜索界面:Embase(通过Embase.com)和Medline(通过PubMed)。通过纳入研究的参考文献识别出其他文献。应用的纳入标准如下:(1)发表于同行评审期刊的原创研究;(2)针对成年人群;(3)研究正念冥想对疼痛结果的作用机制;或(4)提供关于正念冥想潜在作用机制的结论。由两名独立评审员选择研究。分歧通过讨论解决。共有21项英文发表的研究符合纳入标准,其中5项为临床研究,纳入了慢性疼痛患者,16项研究采用了实验性疼痛诱导。通过功能磁共振成像和扩散张量成像对脑机制的研究揭示了正念冥想调节脑活动的能力,特别是在前扣带回皮质、前岛叶和眶额皮质,并增强与疼痛感知相关区域的结构和功能连接。关于阿片类药物的作用,五项研究的结果表明,即使阿片受体被阻断,正念的镇痛作用仍能维持,这表明存在一条非阿片能性的疼痛调节途径。疼痛感知研究强调,正念练习促进疼痛接纳并改变疼痛控制信念,是改善疼痛结果的关键中介因素。对于有经验的与新手正念练习者,结果表明长期练习通过增强突显和注意力控制区域的活动提高疼痛阈值并减轻疼痛不适感。这项系统性综述强调正念冥想是一种多方面的疼痛管理方法,利用认知和情绪重新评估、非阿片能性途径以及增强控制区域注意力等机制。它强调正念在促进疼痛接纳和改变疼痛控制认知方面的作用,展示了其对疼痛的神经学和体验维度的广泛影响。然而,对健康受试者研究的主导地位以及各实验方法的差异使得对研究结果的解读需要谨慎。该综述呼吁进一步研究,更深入地探索正念在慢性疼痛人群中的机制,区分正念的特定效果与非特定效果,并扩大其在慢性疼痛管理临床环境中的适用性。