• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国初级医疗中药物遗传学临床决策支持系统:共同设计研究。

Pharmacogenetics Clinical Decision Support Systems for Primary Care in England: Co-Design Study.

机构信息

Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Pankhurst Institute for Health Technology Research and Innovation, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 23;26:e49230. doi: 10.2196/49230.

DOI:10.2196/49230
PMID:39042886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11303890/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacogenetics can impact patient care and outcomes through personalizing the selection of medicines, resulting in improved efficacy and a reduction in harmful side effects. Despite the existence of compelling clinical evidence and international guidelines highlighting the benefits of pharmacogenetics in clinical practice, implementation within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom is limited. An important barrier to overcome is the development of IT solutions that support the integration of pharmacogenetic data into health care systems. This necessitates a better understanding of the role of electronic health records (EHRs) and the design of clinical decision support systems that are acceptable to clinicians, particularly those in primary care.

OBJECTIVE

Explore the needs and requirements of a pharmacogenetic service from the perspective of primary care clinicians with a view to co-design a prototype solution.

METHODS

We used ethnographic and think-aloud observations, user research workshops, and prototyping. The participants for this study included general practitioners and pharmacists. In total, we undertook 5 sessions of ethnographic observation to understand current practices and workflows. This was followed by 3 user research workshops, each with its own topic guide starting with personas and early ideation, through to exploring the potential of clinical decision support systems and prototype design. We subsequently analyzed workshop data using affinity diagramming and refined the key requirements for the solution collaboratively as a multidisciplinary project team.

RESULTS

User research results identified that pharmacogenetic data must be incorporated within existing EHRs rather than through a stand-alone portal. The information presented through clinical decision support systems must be clear, accessible, and user-friendly as the service will be used by a range of end users. Critically, the information should be displayed within the prescribing workflow, rather than discrete results stored statically in the EHR. Finally, the prescribing recommendations should be authoritative to provide confidence in the validity of the results. Based on these findings we co-designed an interactive prototype, demonstrating pharmacogenetic clinical decision support integrated within the prescribing workflow of an EHR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study marks a significant step forward in the design of systems that support pharmacogenetic-guided prescribing in primary care settings. Clinical decision support systems have the potential to enhance the personalization of medicines, provided they are effectively implemented within EHRs and present pharmacogenetic data in a user-friendly, actionable, and standardized format. Achieving this requires the development of a decoupled, standards-based architecture that allows for the separation of data from application, facilitating integration across various EHRs through the use of application programming interfaces (APIs). More globally, this study demonstrates the role of health informatics and user-centered design in realizing the potential of personalized medicine at scale and ensuring that the benefits of genomic innovation reach patients and populations effectively.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fd/11303890/b94ebc6f3c74/jmir_v26i1e49230_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fd/11303890/0711dcaffa85/jmir_v26i1e49230_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fd/11303890/ffc381ace732/jmir_v26i1e49230_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fd/11303890/b94ebc6f3c74/jmir_v26i1e49230_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fd/11303890/0711dcaffa85/jmir_v26i1e49230_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fd/11303890/ffc381ace732/jmir_v26i1e49230_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fd/11303890/b94ebc6f3c74/jmir_v26i1e49230_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

通过个性化选择药物,药物遗传学可以影响患者的护理和治疗效果,从而提高疗效,减少有害的副作用。尽管有令人信服的临床证据和国际指南强调了药物遗传学在临床实践中的益处,但在英国国民保健服务系统中实施的范围有限。克服的一个重要障碍是开发支持将药物遗传学数据集成到医疗保健系统中的 IT 解决方案。这需要更好地了解电子健康记录(EHR)的作用以及设计可被临床医生(尤其是初级保健医生)接受的临床决策支持系统。

目的

从初级保健临床医生的角度探讨药物遗传学服务的需求和要求,以期共同设计原型解决方案。

方法

我们使用民族志和出声思考观察、用户研究研讨会和原型设计。本研究的参与者包括全科医生和药剂师。我们共进行了 5 次民族志观察,以了解当前的实践和工作流程。随后进行了 3 次用户研究研讨会,每次都有自己的主题指南,从角色和早期构思开始,到探索临床决策支持系统的潜力和原型设计。我们随后使用亲和图分析对研讨会数据进行分析,并作为一个多学科项目团队共同完善解决方案的关键要求。

结果

用户研究结果表明,药物遗传学数据必须纳入现有的 EHR 中,而不是通过单独的门户。通过临床决策支持系统提供的信息必须清晰、易于访问且用户友好,因为该服务将由各种最终用户使用。至关重要的是,信息应该显示在处方工作流程中,而不是作为静态存储在 EHR 中的离散结果。最后,处方建议应该具有权威性,以提供对结果有效性的信心。基于这些发现,我们共同设计了一个交互式原型,展示了在 EHR 处方工作流程中集成的药物遗传学临床决策支持。

结论

这项研究标志着在设计支持初级保健环境中药物遗传学指导处方的系统方面迈出了重要的一步。临床决策支持系统有可能增强药物的个性化,前提是它们在 EHR 中得到有效实施,并以用户友好、可操作和标准化的格式呈现药物遗传学数据。要实现这一点,需要开发一种解耦的、基于标准的架构,允许将数据与应用程序分离,通过使用应用程序编程接口(API)促进各种 EHR 之间的集成。更广泛地说,这项研究展示了健康信息学和以用户为中心的设计在实现个性化医学的潜力并确保基因组创新的益处有效地惠及患者和人群方面的作用。

相似文献

1
Pharmacogenetics Clinical Decision Support Systems for Primary Care in England: Co-Design Study.英国初级医疗中药物遗传学临床决策支持系统:共同设计研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 23;26:e49230. doi: 10.2196/49230.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacogenomics in the UK National Health Service: Progress towards implementation.英国国民医疗服务体系中的药物基因组学:实施进展
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;91(8):2241-2250. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70109. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
2
Barriers and facilitators for implementing a pharmacogenetic passport: lessons learned from reusing sequencing data.实施药物遗传学护照的障碍与促进因素:从重新利用测序数据中汲取的经验教训
Pharmacogenomics. 2025 Apr-Apr;26(5-6):143-156. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2025.2504862. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Embedding Pharmacogenetics Into Clinical Practice to Improve Patient Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge support for optimising antibiotic prescribing for common infections in general practices: evaluation of the effectiveness of periodic feedback, decision support during consultations and peer comparisons in a cluster randomised trial (BRIT2) - study protocol.针对一般实践中常见感染优化抗生素处方的知识支持:在一项集群随机试验(BRIT2)中评估定期反馈、咨询期间决策支持和同行比较的有效性 - 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 22;13(8):e076296. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076296.
2
A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study.一个 12 基因药物遗传学检测面板以预防药物不良反应:一项开放标签、多中心、对照、集群随机交叉实施研究。
Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):347-356. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01841-4.
3
将药物遗传学融入临床实践以改善患者预后。
Ann Hum Genet. 2025 Sep;89(5):398-405. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12601. Epub 2025 May 13.
4
Pharmaceutical Analysis of Inpatient Prescriptions: Systematic Observation of Hospital Pharmacists' Practices in the Early User-Centered Design Phase.住院处方的药物分析:以用户为中心的早期设计阶段医院药剂师实践的系统观察
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 25;12:e65959. doi: 10.2196/65959.
5
Designing an interoperable solution to support pharmacogenomic-guided prescribing in primary care: an implementer report.设计一个可互操作的解决方案以支持基层医疗中药物基因组学指导的处方开具:实施者报告
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Apr 10;32(1):e101163. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101163.
6
Pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing in the acute hospital setting: a cross-sectional study.急性医院环境中的前瞻性药物遗传学检测:一项横断面研究。
QJM. 2025 Mar 1;118(3):154-160. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae200.
Pharmacogenomics: current status and future perspectives.药物基因组学:现状与未来展望。
Nat Rev Genet. 2023 Jun;24(6):350-362. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00572-8. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Characterizing pharmacogenetic programs using the consolidated framework for implementation research: A structured scoping review.使用实施研究综合框架来表征药物遗传学程序:一项结构化范围综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 18;9:945352. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.945352. eCollection 2022.
5
Digital health-enabled genomics: Opportunities and challenges.数字健康赋能的基因组学:机遇与挑战。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Jul 7;109(7):1190-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.05.001.
6
Pharmacogenomics decision support in the U-PGx project: Results and advice from clinical implementation across seven European countries.在 U-PGx 项目中的药物基因组学决策支持:来自七个欧洲国家临床实施的结果和建议。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0268534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268534. eCollection 2022.
7
The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 genotypes and Statin-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms.临床药物遗传学实施联盟指南:SLCO1B1、ABCG2 和 CYP2C9 基因型与他汀类药物相关的肌肉骨骼症状。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 May;111(5):1007-1021. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2557. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
8
GA4GH: International policies and standards for data sharing across genomic research and healthcare.全球基因组与健康联盟(GA4GH):跨基因组研究与医疗保健领域数据共享的国际政策与标准。
Cell Genom. 2021 Nov 10;1(2). doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100029.
9
Documenting Pharmacogenomic Test Results in Electronic Health Records: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Teams.在电子健康记录中记录药物基因组学检测结果:基层医疗团队的实际考量
J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 4;11(12):1296. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121296.
10
Understanding the barriers and enablers of pharmacogenomic testing in primary care: a qualitative systematic review with meta-aggregation synthesis.理解初级保健中药物基因组学检测的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价与元聚合综合。
Pharmacogenomics. 2022 Jan;23(2):135-154. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0131. Epub 2021 Dec 16.