Suppr超能文献

用于血培养的双相系统和非放射测量系统的比较。

Comparison of a biphasic system and a non-radiometric system for blood culture.

作者信息

García Rodriguez J A, García Sanchez J E, Munoz Bellido J L, Canut Blasco A

机构信息

Departamento de Microbiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Oct;7(5):666-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01964249.

Abstract

The performance of a biphasic system for blood culture and a non-radiometric system using infrared spectroscopy was compared using 2,000 blood samples. The biphasic system detected bacteria or fungi in 237 blood cultures in 114 patients, while the non-radiometric system detected these microorganisms in only 186 blood cultures in 91 patients (p less than or equal to 0.05). The speed with which the bacteria were detected and the rate of contamination were similar in the two systems. The capacity to detect different genera and species was similar except in the case of Brucella spp., which the biphasic system detected in 28 blood cultures but the non-radiometric system in only 12 (p less than or equal to 0.05).

摘要

使用2000份血样比较了用于血培养的双相系统和使用红外光谱的非放射测量系统的性能。双相系统在114例患者的237份血培养物中检测到细菌或真菌,而非放射测量系统仅在91例患者的186份血培养物中检测到这些微生物(p小于或等于0.05)。在两个系统中,检测到细菌的速度和污染率相似。除布鲁氏菌属外,两个系统检测不同属和种的能力相似,双相系统在28份血培养物中检测到布鲁氏菌属,而非放射测量系统仅在12份血培养物中检测到(p小于或等于0.05)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验