Suppr超能文献

利用 DNA 条形码和根际微生物群落的微生物组分析对树木进行基因型鉴定。

Genotypic Identification of Trees Using DNA Barcodes and Microbiome Analysis of Rhizosphere Microbial Communities.

机构信息

Biology and Horticulture Department, Bergen Community College, 400 Paramus Road, Paramus, NJ 07652, USA.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 1;15(7):865. doi: 10.3390/genes15070865.

Abstract

DNA barcodes can provide accurate identification of plants. We used previously reported DNA primers targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) region of the nuclear ribosomal cistron, internal transcribed spacer (ITS2), and chloroplast (UAA) intron to identify four trees at Bergen Community College. Two of the four trees were identified as and . However, was only identified at the genus level, and the fourth tree did not show similar identification between barcodes. Next-generation sequencing of 16S rRNA genes showed that the predominant bacterial communities in the rhizosphere mainly consisted of the Pseudomonadota, Actinomycetota, Bacteroidota, and Acidobacteriota. showed the most diverse bacterial community while was less diverse. The genus showed the highest relative bacterial abundance in all trees. Fungal ITS sequence analysis demonstrated that the communities predominantly consisted of the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. showed the highest fungi diversity while showed the lowest. showed the highest abundance of fungi genera. Average similarity values in the rhizosphere for fungi communities at the phylum level were higher than for bacteria. However, at the genus level, bacterial communities showed higher similarities than fungi. Similarity values decreased at lower taxonomical levels for both bacteria and fungi, indicating each tree has selected for specific bacterial and fungal communities. This study confirmed the distinctiveness of the microbial communities in the rhizosphere of each tree and their importance in sustaining and supporting viability and growth but also demonstrating the limitations of DNA barcoding with the primers used in this study to identify genus and species for some of the trees. The optimization of DNA barcoding will require additional DNA sequences to enhance the resolution and identification of trees at the study site.

摘要

DNA 条形码可提供植物的准确鉴定。我们使用先前报道的针对核核糖体基因内转录间隔区(ITS1)、内转录间隔区(ITS2)和叶绿体(UAA)内含子的 DNA 引物,鉴定了 Bergen Community College 的四棵树。这四棵树中有两棵被鉴定为 和 。然而, 仅在属级水平上被鉴定,第四棵树在条形码之间没有显示出类似的鉴定。16S rRNA 基因的下一代测序显示,根际的主要细菌群落主要由假单胞菌门、放线菌门、拟杆菌门和酸杆菌门组成。 显示出最多样的细菌群落,而 则较少样化。在所有树木中,属 显示出最高的相对细菌丰度。真菌 ITS 序列分析表明,群落主要由子囊菌门和担子菌门组成。 显示出最高的真菌多样性,而 则显示出最低的多样性。 显示出真菌属的最高相对丰度。在门水平上,根际真菌群落的平均相似值高于细菌群落。然而,在属水平上,细菌群落的相似性高于真菌群落。对于细菌和真菌,相似值在较低的分类水平上降低,表明每棵树都选择了特定的细菌和真菌群落。本研究证实了每棵树根际微生物群落的独特性及其对维持和支持生物活力和生长的重要性,但也表明了使用本研究中使用的引物进行 DNA 条形码鉴定某些树种的属和种的局限性。DNA 条形码的优化将需要额外的 DNA 序列来提高研究地点树木的分辨率和鉴定能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d06b/11275894/e4e732425dfc/genes-15-00865-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Truffle Microbiome Is Driven by Fruit Body Compartmentalization Rather than Soils Conditioned by Different Host Trees.
mSphere. 2021 Aug 25;6(4):e0003921. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00039-21. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
3
Structure and variation of root-associated microbiomes of potato grown in alfisol.
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Nov 14;35(12):181. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2761-3.
7
A multifactor analysis of fungal and bacterial community structure in the root microbiome of mature Populus deltoides trees.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076382. eCollection 2013.
9
Effects of Waterlogging on Soybean Rhizosphere Bacterial Community Using V4, LoopSeq, and PacBio 16S rRNA Sequence.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0201121. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02011-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Colony Binary Classification Based on Persistent Homology Feature Extraction and Improved EfficientNet.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;12(6):625. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060625.

本文引用的文献

2
Comparative genomics analysis reveals genetic characteristics and nitrogen fixation profile of .
iScience. 2024 Jan 18;27(2):108948. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108948. eCollection 2024 Feb 16.
4
Critical transition of soil microbial diversity and composition triggered by plant rhizosphere effects.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Nov 10;14:1252821. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1252821. eCollection 2023.
6
Ecological Diversity of Bacterial Rhizomicrobiome Core during the Growth of Selected Wheat Cultivars.
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jul 30;12(8):1067. doi: 10.3390/biology12081067.
7
invasion of temperate deciduous forest stands alters the structure and functions of the soil microbiome.
Geoderma. 2023 Feb;430. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116328. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
8
Patterns in soil microbial diversity across Europe.
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 8;14(1):3311. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37937-4.
9
Regional biogeography versus intra-annual dynamics of the root and soil microbiome.
Environ Microbiome. 2023 Jun 7;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00504-x.
10
The soil microbiome: An essential, but neglected, component of regenerative agroecosystems.
iScience. 2023 Feb 1;26(2):106028. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106028. eCollection 2023 Feb 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验