School of Stomatology, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Jose Antonio Lavalle Avenue 302- 304 (Ex Hacienda Villa), Chorrillos, Lima, Peru.
Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04671-2.
The aim of this research was to analyse the current literature on displaced dental implants in the mandibular body, including local and systemic variables related to their cause, and to identify the most frequent location.
The study conducted a search of three databases (Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science) using specific index terms such as 'dental implant', 'displacement', 'dislocation', 'displaced', and 'mandible'. The analysis focused on the direction of displacement and the characteristics of the bone tissue (bone quality, density, and quantity) in cases where dental implants were displaced.
A total of 371 articles were obtained. Thirteen of these articles were selected and read in full. To define bone quality, the Lekholm and Zarb classification, modified by Rosas et al., was used. The type II-B bone, which is characterized by thick cortical bone surrounding cancellous bone with extremely wide medullary spaces, presented the largest number of complications. Twenty-two cases were found in which the displacement direction was horizontal. Of these, four were displaced vestibularly, fourteen lingually, and four remained in the center. Additionally, 24 cases presented vertical displacement, with 12 displaced towards the inferior border of the mandible, 9 towards the middle or adjacent to the inferior dental nerve canal, and 3 above the inferior dental nerve canal.
The accidental displacement of implants within the mandibular body is associated with various risk factors, including the characteristics of the bony trabeculum and the size of the medullary spaces. It is reasonable to suggest that only an adequate pre-surgical diagnostic evaluation, with the help of high-resolution tomographic images that allow a previous evaluation of these structures, will help to have better control over the other factors, thus minimizing the risk of displacement.
本研究旨在分析下颌体中移位牙种植体的当前文献,包括与导致其移位的局部和全身变量相关的内容,并确定最常见的位置。
该研究使用特定索引词(如“牙种植体”、“移位”、“脱位”、“移位”和“下颌”)在三个数据库(Pubmed、Scopus 和 Web of Science)中进行了搜索。分析侧重于牙种植体移位时的移位方向和骨组织特征(骨质量、密度和数量)。
共获得 371 篇文章,其中 13 篇被选中并全文阅读。为了定义骨质量,使用了由 Rosas 等人修改的 Lekholm 和 Zarb 分类法。具有厚皮质骨环绕具有极宽髓腔的松质骨的 II-B 型骨表现出最多的并发症。发现 22 例水平方向的移位。其中,4 例向颊侧移位,14 例向舌侧移位,4 例仍位于中央。此外,24 例出现垂直移位,其中 12 例向下颌骨下缘移位,9 例向中下齿槽神经管或附近移位,3 例在上齿槽神经管上方移位。
下颌体中种植体的意外移位与多种危险因素有关,包括骨小梁的特征和骨髓腔的大小。合理的建议是,只有通过术前诊断评估,并借助允许对这些结构进行预先评估的高分辨率断层扫描图像,才能更好地控制其他因素,从而最大限度地降低移位风险。