Suppr超能文献

天然漱口水与氯己定在牙菌斑管理中的比较评估:一项初步随机临床试验

Comparative Evaluation of Natural Mouthrinses and Chlorhexidine in Dental Plaque Management: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Lile Ioana Elena, Hajaj Tareq, Veja Ioana, Hosszu Tiberiu, Vaida Ligia Luminița, Todor Liana, Stana Otilia, Popovici Ramona-Amina, Marian Diana

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, "Vasile Goldiș" Western University of Arad, 94-96 Revolutiei Blvd., 310025 Arad, Romania.

Department of Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 Eftimie Murgu Sq, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 19;13(10):1181. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101181.

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of mouthrinses containing natural compounds-specifically, propolis and green tea extracts-in reducing bacterial dental plaque compared to a placebo and a 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse. We hypothesized that these natural compounds would significantly reduce plaque accumulation, with efficacy comparable to chlorhexidine. The objective was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of two natural mouthrinses-10% propolis and 5% green tea-compared to a placebo and 0.2% chlorhexidine in reducing dental plaque. The trial design was a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. In a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 60 healthy adult volunteers received a professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) and were then randomized into four groups ( = 15 each): a propolis mouthwash, a green tea mouthwash, a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash (positive control), and a placebo rinse. The participants rinsed twice daily for four weeks in addition to standard tooth brushing. The plaque levels were assessed using the Silness-Löe plaque index at baseline and after four weeks. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. All groups had similar baseline plaque scores (≈2.5). After four weeks, the propolis and green tea groups showed significant reductions in plaque (mean indices of 1.02 and 1.12, respectively) compared to the placebo group (mean index = 2.01, < 0.001). The chlorhexidine group achieved a mean plaque index of 0.90. The propolis rinse showed no significant difference from chlorhexidine ( = 0.40), indicating comparable efficacy. The green tea rinse had a slightly higher plaque index than chlorhexidine ( = 0.03). No significant adverse effects were reported. Mouthwashes containing 10% propolis or 5% green tea significantly reduced dental plaque, with propolis demonstrating efficacy comparable to 0.2% chlorhexidine.

摘要

本研究评估了含天然化合物(具体为蜂胶和绿茶提取物)的漱口水与安慰剂及0.2%氯己定漱口水相比,在减少细菌性牙菌斑方面的疗效。我们假设这些天然化合物能显著减少牙菌斑积聚,其疗效与氯己定相当。目的是评估两种天然漱口水(10%蜂胶和5%绿茶)与安慰剂及0.2%氯己定相比,在减少牙菌斑方面的短期疗效。试验设计为随机、安慰剂对照、平行组临床试验,分配比例为1:1:1:1。在一项单盲、随机、对照试验中,60名健康成年志愿者接受了专业机械性牙菌斑清除(PMPR),然后被随机分为四组(每组n = 15):蜂胶漱口水组、绿茶漱口水组、0.2%氯己定漱口水组(阳性对照)和安慰剂漱口水组。除标准刷牙外,参与者每天漱口两次,共四周。在基线和四周后使用Silness-Löe菌斑指数评估菌斑水平。数据采用方差分析和事后检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。获得了伦理批准和知情同意。所有组的基线菌斑评分相似(约为2.5)。四周后,与安慰剂组(平均指数 = 2.01,P < 0.001)相比,蜂胶组和绿茶组的菌斑显著减少(平均指数分别为1.02和1.12)。氯己定组的平均菌斑指数为0.90。蜂胶漱口水与氯己定相比无显著差异(P = 0.40),表明疗效相当。绿茶漱口水的菌斑指数略高于氯己定(P = 0.03)。未报告显著不良反应。含10%蜂胶或5%绿茶的漱口水能显著减少牙菌斑,蜂胶的疗效与0.2%氯己定相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7679/12111160/5d166d84a6e7/healthcare-13-01181-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验