Kendler K S
Schizophr Bull. 1985;11(4):538-53. doi: 10.1093/schbul/11.4.538.
The goal of this article is to provide a historical perspective on the DSM-III concept of schizotypal personality disorder. It is argued that two major traditions have influenced our conceptualization of this diagnostic entity. The first or familial approach emphasizes the characteristic traits found in the deviant but nonpsychotic relatives of schizophrenics. The second or clinical approach focuses on patients who appear to demonstrate the fundamental symptoms of schizophrenia without psychotic symptoms or severe personality deterioration. A review of these two traditions concludes that while similar in some regards, they also differ in important ways in their views on the characteristics of the true "schizotype." The impact of these two traditions is then traced through the Danish Adoption Studies of Kety et al. to the development of the DSM-III criteria for schizotypal personality by Spitzer, Endicott, and Gibbon. Finally, the article reviews recent studies on the validity of specific criteria for schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) and reassesses the conceptual issue about the nature of the relationship of SPD to schizophrenia on the one hand and to other personality disorders on the other.
本文的目的是提供对分裂型人格障碍的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)概念的历史视角。有人认为,两大主要传统影响了我们对这一诊断实体的概念化。第一种或家族性方法强调在精神分裂症患者的异常但非精神病性亲属中发现的特征性特质。第二种或临床方法关注那些似乎表现出精神分裂症的基本症状但无精神病性症状或严重人格衰退的患者。对这两种传统的回顾得出结论,虽然它们在某些方面相似,但在对真正“分裂型人格”特征的看法上也存在重要差异。然后,通过凯蒂等人的丹麦收养研究,追溯这两种传统对斯皮策、恩迪科特和吉本制定的DSM - III分裂型人格障碍标准的影响。最后,本文回顾了近期关于分裂型人格障碍(SPD)特定标准有效性的研究,并重新评估了关于SPD一方面与精神分裂症,另一方面与其他人格障碍关系本质的概念问题。