• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习在医疗急救部门的诊断支持中的应用。

Machine learning in diagnostic support in medical emergency departments.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 2;14(1):17889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66837-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-66837-w
PMID:39095565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11297196/
Abstract

Diagnosing patients in the medical emergency department is complex and this is expected to increase in many countries due to an ageing population. In this study we investigate the feasibility of training machine learning algorithms to assist physicians handling the complex situation in the medical emergency departments. This is expected to reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient logistics and outcome. We included a total of 9,190 consecutive patient admissions diagnosed and treated in two hospitals in this cohort study. Patients had a biochemical workup including blood and urine analyses on clinical decision totaling 260 analyses. After adding nurse-registered data we trained 19 machine learning algorithms on a random 80% sample of the patients and validated the results on the remaining 20%. We trained algorithms for 19 different patient outcomes including the main outcomes death in 7 (Area under the Curve (AUC) 91.4%) and 30 days (AUC 91.3%) and safe-discharge(AUC 87.3%). The various algorithms obtained areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristics -curves in the range of 71.8-96.3% in the holdout cohort (68.3-98.2% in the training cohort). Performing this list of biochemical analyses at admission also reduced the number of subsequent venipunctures within 24 h from patient admittance by 22%. We have shown that it is possible to develop a list of machine-learning algorithms with high AUC for use in medical emergency departments. Moreover, the study showed that it is possible to reduce the number of venipunctures in this cohort.

摘要

在医疗急救部门诊断患者的情况非常复杂,预计在许多国家,由于人口老龄化,这种情况还会增加。在这项研究中,我们研究了培训机器学习算法来协助医生处理医疗急救部门复杂情况的可行性。这有望减少诊断错误,并改善患者的流程管理和预后。我们在这项队列研究中纳入了两家医院共 9190 例连续入院的患者。患者接受了包括血液和尿液分析在内的生化检查,这些检查是基于临床决策的,总共进行了 260 次分析。在添加了护士登记的数据后,我们在患者的 80%随机样本上训练了 19 种机器学习算法,并在剩余的 20%样本上验证了结果。我们针对 19 种不同的患者结局训练了算法,包括主要结局(死亡:AUC 91.4%)和 30 天(AUC 91.3%)和安全出院(AUC 87.3%)。在验证队列中,各种算法获得的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)范围为 71.8%-96.3%(训练队列中为 68.3%-98.2%)。在入院时进行这组生化分析还使入院后 24 小时内的后续静脉穿刺次数减少了 22%。我们已经证明,开发具有高 AUC 的机器学习算法列表并将其应用于医疗急救部门是可行的。此外,该研究还表明,在该队列中减少静脉穿刺次数是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6cd/11297196/649647aaa63a/41598_2024_66837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6cd/11297196/31ae48d2fddc/41598_2024_66837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6cd/11297196/261d99153bfa/41598_2024_66837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6cd/11297196/649647aaa63a/41598_2024_66837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6cd/11297196/31ae48d2fddc/41598_2024_66837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6cd/11297196/261d99153bfa/41598_2024_66837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6cd/11297196/649647aaa63a/41598_2024_66837_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning in diagnostic support in medical emergency departments.机器学习在医疗急救部门的诊断支持中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 2;14(1):17889. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66837-w.
2
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
3
Predicting hospital admission for older emergency department patients: Insights from machine learning.预测老年急诊科患者住院:来自机器学习的见解。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Aug;140:104163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104163. Epub 2020 May 16.
4
Predicting the risk of emergency admission with machine learning: Development and validation using linked electronic health records.使用机器学习预测急诊入院风险:基于电子健康记录的开发和验证。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002695. eCollection 2018 Nov.
5
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.
7
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
8
Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.机器学习模型对上消化道出血的预测能力优于临床风险评分系统的验证。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):160-167. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Prediction of prognosis in lung cancer using machine learning with inter-institutional generalizability: A multicenter cohort study (WJOG15121L: REAL-WIND).利用机器学习进行机构间可推广性的肺癌预后预测:多中心队列研究(WJOG15121L:REAL-WIND)。
Lung Cancer. 2024 Aug;194:107896. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107896. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
10
A machine learning approach to predict early outcomes after pituitary adenoma surgery.一种用于预测垂体腺瘤手术后早期结果的机器学习方法。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E8. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18268.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.绘制急诊医学中的人工智能模型:关于人工智能在急诊护理和教育中表现的范围综述。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 1;25(2):67-91. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_45_25. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Predicting Inpatient Admissions From Emergency Department Triage Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.使用机器学习从急诊科分诊预测住院患者入院情况:一项系统综述。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2025 Jan 30;3(1):100197. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100197. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved interpretable machine learning emergency department triage tool addressing class imbalance.改进的可解释机器学习急诊科分诊工具,解决类别不平衡问题。
Digit Health. 2024 May 2;10:20552076241240910. doi: 10.1177/20552076241240910. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
How artificial intelligence could transform emergency care.人工智能如何改变急救护理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;81:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.04.024. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Prediction of high-risk emergency department revisits from a machine-learning algorithm: a proof-of-concept study.
基于机器学习算法的高危急诊科复诊预测:概念验证研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Apr 22;31(1):e100859. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100859.
4
Diagnostic error among vulnerable populations presenting to the emergency department with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular or neurological symptoms: a systematic review.易误诊人群在因心血管、脑血管或神经系统症状就诊于急诊科时的诊断错误:系统综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Nov;32(11):676-688. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015038. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
POCT urine dipstick versus central laboratory analyses: Diagnostic performance and logistics in the medical emergency department.即时检验尿液干化学试纸条与中心实验室检测结果比较:在医疗急救部门的诊断性能和后勤保障。
Clin Biochem. 2023 Jan;111:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.10.010. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Metabolomic profiles predict individual multidisease outcomes.代谢组学特征可预测个体多种疾病的结局。
Nat Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):2309-2320. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01980-3. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
7
Using Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Hospital Admission at the Emergency Department.使用机器学习技术预测急诊科的住院情况。
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2022 May 12;8(2):107-116. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2022-0003. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Human-machine teaming is key to AI adoption: clinicians' experiences with a deployed machine learning system.人机协作是采用人工智能的关键:临床医生使用已部署机器学习系统的经验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jul 21;5(1):97. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00597-7.
9
Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation.用于识别急诊科脓毒症患者的机器学习模型:算法开发与验证
J Pers Med. 2021 Oct 21;11(11):1055. doi: 10.3390/jpm11111055.
10
Diagnostic significance of combining D-dimer with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I for improving the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in the emergency department.D-二聚体与高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I联合检测对提高急诊科静脉血栓栓塞症诊断的意义
Acta Biomed. 2021 Nov 3;92(5):e2021287. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.9752.