Suppr超能文献

骨导颈前庭诱发肌源性电位:短声刺激与啁啾刺激的比较。

Bone conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: comparison of tone burst stimulus vs chirp stimulus.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Traning and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Audiology, Gulhane Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Dec;281(12):6391-6395. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08886-5. Epub 2024 Aug 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) is a test used to evaluate the function of otolith organs. In healthy individuals, air-conducted (AC) responses are obtained, whereas, in conductive hearing loss, the inability to transmit the signal well enough with AC stimuli has led to the need for bone-conducted (BC) stimuli. This study aimed to compare 500 Hz Chirp and Tone Burst stimuli in terms of latency and amplitude in BC cVEMP.

METHODS

This prospective observational case control study included 35 healthy participants (70 ears) between the age of 20-50. Participants underwent VEMP testing with BC 500 Hz Tone Burst stimulus and 500 Hz narrow band Chirp stimulus without changing the position of the bone conducted vibrator. The intensity of the stimuli was 50 dB nHL.

RESULTS

Response rate of 500 Hz TB Stimulus was 51.4% and 95.7% in Chirp stimulus. It was observed that significantly more responses were obtained with Chirp stimulus than TB stimulus (p < 0.001). In terms of p1 latency, n1 latency, both latencies were significantly shorter in Chirp stimulus (p < 0.001). p1n1 amplitude was found significantly larger in Chirp stimulus (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to 500 Hz TB stimulus, 500 Hz Chirp stimulus results in a higher response rate, larger p1n1 amplitude, and shorter p1 and n1 latency. A higher response rate may provide a more accurate assessment of otolith organs, reducing false negatives due to signal transmission in patients.

摘要

目的

前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMP)是一种用于评估耳石器官功能的测试。在健康个体中,可以获得空气传导(AC)反应,而在传导性听力损失中,由于 AC 刺激信号无法充分传输,因此需要骨传导(BC)刺激。本研究旨在比较 500Hz Chirp 和 Tone Burst 刺激在 BC cVEMP 中的潜伏期和振幅。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察性病例对照研究,纳入了年龄在 20-50 岁之间的 35 名健康参与者(70 只耳朵)。参与者接受了 BC 500Hz Tone Burst 刺激和 500Hz 窄带 Chirp 刺激的 VEMP 测试,而无需改变骨导振动器的位置。刺激强度为 50dB nHL。

结果

500Hz TB 刺激的反应率为 51.4%,Chirp 刺激的反应率为 95.7%。与 TB 刺激相比,Chirp 刺激获得的反应明显更多(p<0.001)。在 p1 潜伏期和 n1 潜伏期方面,Chirp 刺激的潜伏期均明显更短(p<0.001)。Chirp 刺激的 p1n1 振幅明显更大(p<0.001)。

结论

与 500Hz TB 刺激相比,500Hz Chirp 刺激可获得更高的反应率、更大的 p1n1 振幅和更短的 p1 和 n1 潜伏期。更高的反应率可能提供更准确的耳石器官评估,减少因患者信号传输而导致的假阴性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/222b/11564278/619f54a897a4/405_2024_8886_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验