• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别偏见对疼痛管理决策的影响。

Sex bias in pain management decisions.

机构信息

Hebrew University Business School, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.

Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2401331121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401331121. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2401331121
PMID:39102546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331074/
Abstract

In the pursuit of mental and physical health, effective pain management stands as a cornerstone. Here, we examine a potential sex bias in pain management. Leveraging insights from psychological research showing that females' pain is stereotypically judged as less intense than males' pain, we hypothesize that there may be tangible differences in pain management decisions based on patients' sex. Our investigation spans emergency department (ED) datasets from two countries, including discharge notes of patients arriving with pain complaints (N = 21,851). Across these datasets, a consistent sex disparity emerges. Female patients are less likely to be prescribed pain-relief medications compared to males, and this disparity persists even after adjusting for patients' reported pain scores and numerous patient, physician, and ED variables. This disparity extends across medical practitioners, with both male and female physicians prescribing less pain-relief medications to females than to males. Additional analyses reveal that female patients' pain scores are 10% less likely to be recorded by nurses, and female patients spend an additional 30 min in the ED compared to male patients. A controlled experiment employing clinical vignettes reinforces our hypothesis, showing that nurses (N = 109) judge pain of female patients to be less intense than that of males. We argue that the findings reflect an undertreatment of female patients' pain. We discuss the troubling societal and medical implications of females' pain being overlooked and call for policy interventions to ensure equal pain treatment.

摘要

在追求身心健康的过程中,有效的疼痛管理是一个基石。在这里,我们探讨了疼痛管理中可能存在的性别偏见。利用心理学研究的发现,即女性的疼痛通常被认为不如男性的疼痛强烈,我们假设在基于患者性别做出疼痛管理决策时可能存在明显的差异。我们的调查涵盖了来自两个国家的急诊部门(ED)数据集,包括因疼痛就诊的患者的出院记录(N=21851)。在这些数据集中,出现了一致的性别差距。与男性相比,女性患者接受疼痛缓解药物治疗的可能性较低,即使在调整了患者报告的疼痛评分以及众多患者、医生和 ED 变量后,这种差距仍然存在。这种差距跨越了医疗从业者,男性和女性医生给女性患者开具的疼痛缓解药物也少于男性患者。进一步的分析表明,护士记录女性患者疼痛评分的可能性低 10%,并且女性患者在 ED 中比男性患者多停留 30 分钟。一项采用临床病例的对照实验证实了我们的假设,结果表明护士(N=109)认为女性患者的疼痛比男性患者的疼痛弱。我们认为,这些发现反映了女性患者的疼痛治疗不足。我们讨论了忽视女性患者疼痛所带来的令人不安的社会和医疗影响,并呼吁采取政策干预措施,以确保女性患者得到平等的疼痛治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa28/11331074/c00cb0e21b39/pnas.2401331121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa28/11331074/ce25d604f08b/pnas.2401331121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa28/11331074/e46b27d51913/pnas.2401331121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa28/11331074/c00cb0e21b39/pnas.2401331121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa28/11331074/ce25d604f08b/pnas.2401331121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa28/11331074/e46b27d51913/pnas.2401331121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa28/11331074/c00cb0e21b39/pnas.2401331121fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex bias in pain management decisions.性别偏见对疼痛管理决策的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2401331121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401331121. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Race/Ethnicity and Sex and Opioid Administration in the Emergency Room.急诊室中的种族/民族、性别和阿片类药物的使用。
Anesth Analg. 2019 May;128(5):1005-1012. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003517.
3
Interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: United States Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing, 2006-2010.解读美国国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2006 - 2010年美国急诊科阿片类药物处方情况
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):159-65. doi: 10.1111/acem.12862. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
4
No gender-related bias in acute musculoskeletal pain management in the emergency department.急诊科急性肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中不存在性别相关偏见。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Feb;32(2):149-52. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202716. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
5
National opioid prescribing trends in emergency departments by provider type: 2005-2015.全国范围内按提供者类型划分的急诊部门阿片类药物处方趋势:2005-2015 年。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1439-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.041. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Substance use history is associated with lower opioid use for emergency department pain management.物质使用史与急诊科疼痛管理中阿片类药物使用减少有关。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:187-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
7
Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Prescribing for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评价减少急诊科出院患者阿片类药物处方干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43425.
8
Impact of physicians' sex on treatment choices for low back pain.医生性别对腰痛治疗选择的影响。
Pain Pract. 2013 Jul;13(6):451-8. doi: 10.1111/papr.12015. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
9
Patient Preference and Risk Assessment in Opioid Prescribing Disparities: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.患者偏好和风险评估在阿片类药物处方差异中的作用:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2118801. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18801.
10
Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Prescriptions at Emergency Department Visits for Conditions Commonly Associated with Prescription Drug Abuse.急诊科就诊时因常见于与处方药滥用相关病症的阿片类药物处方中的种族-族裔差异。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 8;11(8):e0159224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159224. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
A Literature Review on Pain Management in Women During Medical Procedures: Gaps, Challenges, and Recommendations.关于医疗程序中女性疼痛管理的文献综述:差距、挑战与建议
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 26;61(8):1352. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081352.
2
Sex-Related Differences in Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review by a Multidisciplinary Task Force.慢性疼痛中的性别差异:多学科特别工作组的叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 28;61(7):1172. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071172.
3
Ambivalent sexism predicts Israelis' gendered preferences in the Gaza hostage crisis.

本文引用的文献

1
Women exaggerate, men downplay: Gendered endorsement of emotional dramatization stereotypes contributes to gender bias in pain expectations.女性夸大,男性淡化:对情感夸张刻板印象的性别化认可导致疼痛预期中的性别偏见。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov;109. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104520. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
2
The Woman Who Cried Pain: Do Sex-Based Disparities Still Exist in the Experience and Treatment of Pain?《喊疼的女人:疼痛的体验和治疗中是否仍存在基于性别的差异?》
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(3):519-541. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.91.
3
Tackling Implicit Bias in Health Care.
矛盾的性别歧视预示着以色列人在加沙人质危机中的性别偏好。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;3(1):113. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00279-6.
4
Evaluating the role of palliative care in emergency department opioid use among advanced cancer patients.评估姑息治疗在晚期癌症患者急诊科使用阿片类药物中的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 19;33(8):706. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09711-3.
5
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbid Parkinson's Disease in Spain: A Nationwide Observational Study (2017-2023).西班牙2型糖尿病合并帕金森病住院患者的人口统计学和临床特征:一项全国性观察性研究(2017 - 2023年)
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 2;14(13):4679. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134679.
6
Sport can do better: female athletes' perspectives on managing menstrual and hormonal contraceptive cycle-related symptoms.体育可以做得更好:女运动员对管理与月经和激素避孕周期相关症状的看法。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 May 26;7:1597469. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1597469. eCollection 2025.
7
Women's Pain Management Across the Lifespan-A Narrative Review of Hormonal, Physiological, and Psychosocial Perspectives.女性一生各阶段的疼痛管理——激素、生理和社会心理视角的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 14;14(10):3427. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103427.
8
Emergency room management of urolithiasis: a sex-based comparison.尿石症的急诊室管理:基于性别的比较
Can J Urol. 2025 Apr 30;32(2):81-88. doi: 10.32604/cju.2025.063415.
9
QnAs with Shoham Choshen-Hillel and Alex Gileles-Hillel.与肖哈姆·乔申 - 希勒尔和亚历克斯·吉莱莱斯 - 希勒尔的问答
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 12;121(46):e2421270121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2421270121. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
应对医疗保健中的隐性偏见。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 14;387(2):105-107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2201180. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
Physicians prescribe fewer analgesics during night shifts than day shifts.医生在夜班时开的镇痛药比白班时少。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 5;119(27):e2200047119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200047119. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
5
Women are credited less in science than men.女性在科学领域的贡献被低估了,相比男性而言。
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7921):135-145. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Why Antibias Interventions (Need Not) Fail.为何反偏见干预(未必)会失败。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;17(5):1381-1403. doi: 10.1177/17456916211057565. Epub 2022 May 17.
7
Association of Surgeon-Patient Sex Concordance With Postoperative Outcomes.外科医生与患者性别一致性与术后结果的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Feb 1;157(2):146-156. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6339.
8
Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States.美国成年人慢性疼痛的患病率。
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e328-e332. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002291.
9
Gender Biases in Estimation of Others' Pain.他人疼痛估计中的性别偏见。
J Pain. 2021 Sep;22(9):1048-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
10
Does Patient-Physician Gender Concordance Influence Patient Perceptions or Outcomes?医患性别一致性会影响患者的认知或治疗结果吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 2;77(8):1135-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.031.