Teare E L, Sexton C, Lim F, McManus T, Cuttley A H, Hodgson J
Genitourin Med. 1985 Dec;61(6):379-82. doi: 10.1136/sti.61.6.379.
Specimens collected from 182 patients with histories suggesting chlamydial disease were examined by conventional culture and direct immunofluorescence techniques. Chlamydia trachomatis was identified by both methods in 57% of all patients. There was no significant difference between the two methods in detecting C trachomatis. Where a tissue culture service is not already established, cost analysis in individual departments may justify the use of the immunofluorescence method.
从182例有衣原体疾病病史的患者身上采集的标本,采用传统培养法和直接免疫荧光技术进行检测。两种方法在所有患者中均检测出沙眼衣原体的比例为57%。两种方法在检测沙眼衣原体方面无显著差异。在尚未建立组织培养服务的部门,各部门的成本分析可能表明使用免疫荧光法是合理的。