Suppr超能文献

评估常见草药黑升麻、紫锥菊、接骨木、银杏和姜黄的掺假程度——其挑战和局限性。

Estimating the extent of adulteration of the popular herbs black cohosh, echinacea, elder berry, ginkgo, and turmeric - its challenges and limitations.

机构信息

American Botanical Council, 6200 Manor Road, 78723, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Nat Prod Rep. 2024 Oct 17;41(10):1604-1621. doi: 10.1039/d4np00014e.

Abstract

Covering: up to July 2023Botanical natural medicinal products and dietary supplements are utilized globally for their positive impacts on health and wellness. However, the effectiveness and safety of botanical products can be compromised by unintentional or intentional adulteration. The presence of adulterated botanical ingredients in the global market has been documented in the published literature but a key question, namely what the extent of adulteration is, remains to be answered. This review aims to estimate the prevalence of adulteration in preparations made from black cohosh rhizome, echinacea root or herb, elder berry, ginkgo leaf, and turmeric root/rhizome. According to the information provided in the 78 publications retrieved for this paper, 818 of 2995 samples were reported to be adulterated and/or mislabeled. Ginkgo leaf samples ( = 533) had the highest adulteration rate with 56.7%, followed by black cohosh rhizome ( = 322) samples with 42.2%, echinacea root/herb ( = 200) with 28.5%, elder berry ( = 695) with 17.1%, and turmeric root/rhizome ( = 1247) with 16.5%. Products sold as licensed or registered herbal medicines were found to have a lower risk of adulteration compared to products sold as dietary/food supplements. The data show that the adulteration rate substantially differs from one ingredient to the other. Due to the significant limitations of the available data upon which the estimated extent of adulteration is based, and the rapidly changing botanical dietary supplement market, conclusions from the five herbs examined in this publication cannot be applied to other botanicals traded in the global market. However, the data clearly show that a substantial portion of the botanical dietary supplements do not contain what is claimed on their labels.

摘要

涵盖范围

截至 2023 年 7 月,植物天然药物和膳食补充剂因其对健康和健康的积极影响而在全球范围内得到应用。然而,植物产品的有效性和安全性可能因非故意或故意掺假而受到影响。已在已发表的文献中记录了全球市场中掺假植物成分的存在,但一个关键问题,即掺假的程度是多少,仍有待回答。本综述旨在估计黑升麻根茎、紫锥菊根或草、接骨木果、银杏叶和姜黄根/根茎制成的制剂中掺假的流行程度。根据本文检索到的 78 篇出版物提供的信息,在 2995 个样本中,有 818 个被报告为掺假和/或标签错误。银杏叶样本(= 533)的掺假率最高,为 56.7%,其次是黑升麻根茎样本(= 322),为 42.2%,紫锥菊根/草样本(= 200)为 28.5%,接骨木果样本(= 695)为 17.1%,姜黄根/根茎样本(= 1247)为 16.5%。与作为膳食/食品补充剂销售的产品相比,作为许可或注册草药销售的产品发现掺假的风险较低。数据表明,从一种成分到另一种成分,掺假率有很大差异。由于基于估计掺假程度的可用数据存在重大限制,以及植物性膳食补充剂市场的快速变化,因此本文所检查的五种草药的结论不能应用于全球市场上交易的其他植物。然而,数据清楚地表明,相当一部分植物性膳食补充剂不含其标签上声称的成分。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验