Rebelo André, Pereira João R, Martinho Diogo V, Duarte João P, Coelho-E-Silva Manuel J, Valente-Dos-Santos João
LX Applied Sport Sciences Research Group, 1000-289 Lisbon, Portugal.
CIDEFES, Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Educação Física e Exercício e Saúde, Universidade Lusófona, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;10(4):593. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040593.
The reactive strength index (RSI) describes the individual's capability to quickly change from an eccentric muscular contraction to a concentric one and can be used to monitor, assess, and reduce the risk of athlete's injury. The purpose of this review is to compare the effectiveness of different training programs on RSI. Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science from database inception to 11 February 2022. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). The search returned 5890 records, in which 39 studies were included in the systematic review and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results from the randomized studies with the control group revealed that plyometric training improved RSI in adult athletes (0.84, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.32) and youth athletes (0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.47). Evidence withdrawn from randomized studies without a control group revealed that resistance training also improved the RSI (0.44, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.79) in youth athletes but not in adults. Interventions with plyometric training routines have a relatively large, statistically significant overall effect in both adult and youth athletes. This supports the implementation of this type of interventions in early ages to better cope with the physical demands of the various sports. The impact of resistance training is very low in adult athletes, as these should seek to have a more power-type training to see improvements on the RSI. More interventions with sprint and combined training are needed.
反应力量指数(RSI)描述了个体从离心肌肉收缩快速转变为向心肌肉收缩的能力,可用于监测、评估和降低运动员受伤风险。本综述的目的是比较不同训练方案对RSI的有效性。从数据库建立到2022年2月11日,在MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science中进行了电子检索。本荟萃分析是按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)的建议进行的。检索返回5890条记录,其中39项研究纳入系统评价,30项研究纳入荟萃分析。有对照组的随机研究结果显示,增强式训练可提高成年运动员(0.84,95%CI 0.37至1.32)和青少年运动员(0.30,95%CI 0.13至0.47)的RSI。无对照组的随机研究结果显示,阻力训练也可提高青少年运动员的RSI(0.44,95%CI 0.08至0.79),但对成年运动员无效。采用增强式训练方案的干预措施对成年和青少年运动员均具有相对较大的、具有统计学意义的总体效果。这支持在早期实施这类干预措施,以更好地应对各种运动的身体需求。阻力训练对成年运动员的影响非常小,因为成年运动员应寻求进行更多的力量型训练以提高RSI。需要更多的短跑和综合训练干预措施。