Suppr超能文献

40岁及以上患者半月板修复术后临床结局的系统评价与荟萃分析。

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes Following Meniscus Repair in Patients 40 Years and Older.

作者信息

Sedgwick Matthew J, Saunders Christopher, Getgood Alan M J

机构信息

Smith+Nephew, Hull, UK.

Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Aug 8;12(8):23259671241258974. doi: 10.1177/23259671241258974. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Meniscal repair has been associated with long-term benefit in patients compared with meniscectomy. As a generalization, meniscal repair in older patients is less likely to be successful, leading to reduced adoption of meniscal repair compared with younger patients.

PURPOSE

To establish the clinical performance of meniscal repair in "older" patients (age, ≥40 years) and compare it with performance in "younger" patients (age, <40 years).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in September 2021 using Embase and PubMed to identify published English-language studies that reported on a meniscal repair in >5 patients aged ≥40 years. Outcomes of interest were success/failure rate (as defined by the study), revision meniscal procedure rate, and patient-reported outcomes. Meta-analyses were used to synthesize outcomes across all studies in older patients. Meta-analyses were also used to compare outcomes between older and younger patients across studies, providing data on both age groups.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified. Meniscal repair in older patients was determined to have a failure rate of 12% (95% CI, 7.3% to 19.4%) and a revision meniscal procedure rate of 9.8% (95% CI, 6.2% to 15.0%). The postoperative Lysholm score was 86.7 (95% CI, 81.7 to 91.7). No statistically significant differences were observed between older and younger patients in failure rate (relative risk [RR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.44 to 1.21]; = .2205), revision meniscal procedure rate (RR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.16]; = .1613), or Lysholm scores (mean difference, 2.3 [95% CI, -4.7 to 9.2]; = .5278, 4 studies).

CONCLUSION

Meniscal repair in selected patients aged ≥40 years resulted in good success rates and patient-reported outcome measures, which appear similar to those reported for patients aged <40 years. Therefore, meniscal repairs can be performed in at least a specific portion of "older" patients, and age per se should not be the sole determining factor in whether to perform a meniscal repair.

摘要

背景

与半月板切除术相比,半月板修复已被证明对患者具有长期益处。一般来说,老年患者的半月板修复成功的可能性较小,因此与年轻患者相比,半月板修复的应用较少。

目的

确定“老年”患者(年龄≥40岁)半月板修复的临床效果,并与“年轻”患者(年龄<40岁)的效果进行比较。

研究设计

系统评价;证据等级,4级。

方法

2021年9月,利用Embase和PubMed进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定已发表的英文研究,这些研究报告了5例以上年龄≥40岁患者的半月板修复情况。感兴趣的结果包括成功/失败率(由研究定义)、半月板翻修手术率和患者报告的结果。采用荟萃分析来综合所有老年患者研究的结果。还采用荟萃分析来比较各研究中老年患者和年轻患者的结果,提供两个年龄组的数据。

结果

共纳入14项研究。老年患者半月板修复的失败率为12%(95%CI,7.3%至19.4%),半月板翻修手术率为9.8%(95%CI,6.2%至15.0%)。术后Lysholm评分为86.7(95%CI,81.7至91.7)。老年患者和年轻患者在失败率(相对风险[RR],0.73[95%CI,0.44至1.21];P =.2205)、半月板翻修手术率(RR,0.69[95%CI,0.41至1.16];P =.1613)或Lysholm评分(平均差异,2.3[95%CI,-4.7至9.2];P =.5278,4项研究)方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在选定的年龄≥40岁的患者中进行半月板修复,成功率较高,患者报告的结果指标良好,与年龄<40岁的患者报告的结果相似。因此,至少在一部分“老年”患者中可以进行半月板修复,年龄本身不应成为决定是否进行半月板修复的唯一因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f5/11311169/315f1aa90fd6/10.1177_23259671241258974-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验