• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: A Balance Between Privacy and Effectiveness.采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:在隐私和效果之间取得平衡。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 4;23(3):e25726. doi: 10.2196/25726.
2
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.**COVID-19 追踪应用的质量和采用情况,以及开发建议:对欧洲应用的系统跨学科审查。**
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989.
3
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
4
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.
5
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.
6
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.接触者追踪应用程序的应用现状以及关于隐私保护和公共卫生的建议:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e23250. doi: 10.2196/23250.
7
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
8
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps: Analysis of the Readability of Privacy Policies.新冠病毒病接触者追踪应用程序:隐私政策可读性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21572. doi: 10.2196/21572.
9
The Role of Transparency, Trust, and Social Influence on Uncertainty Reduction in Times of Pandemics: Empirical Study on the Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps.透明度、信任和社会影响在大流行时期减少不确定性的作用:对 COVID-19 追踪应用程序采用的实证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25893. doi: 10.2196/25893.
10
Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of mHealth apps for COVID-19 contact tracing: a systematic review of the literature.促进和阻碍采用移动健康应用程序进行 COVID-19 接触者追踪的因素:文献系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 7;11:1222600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1222600. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The Emergence of AI in Public Health Is Calling for Operational Ethics to Foster Responsible Uses.人工智能在公共卫生领域的出现促使人们呼吁实施操作伦理以促进负责任的使用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 4;22(4):568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040568.
2
Epidemiological methods in transition: Minimizing biases in classical and digital approaches.转型中的流行病学方法:最大限度减少传统方法和数字方法中的偏差。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jan 13;4(1):e0000670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000670. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Determinants of Citizens' Intention to Participate in Self-Led Contact Tracing: Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Study.公民参与自我主导接触者追踪意愿的决定因素:横断面在线问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 30;10:e56943. doi: 10.2196/56943.
4
Contextual Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Mobile Apps in the United States: Mixed Methods Survey Study on Postpandemic Data Privacy.美国 COVID-19 缓解移动应用程序的使用背景:后疫情时代数据隐私的混合方法调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e57309. doi: 10.2196/57309.
5
Identifying Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Contact Tracing Apps in England: Semistructured Interview Study With Professionals Involved in the Pandemic Response.识别英国采用数字接触者追踪应用程序的障碍:对参与疫情应对的专业人员进行的半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 12;8:e56000. doi: 10.2196/56000.
6
Changes to Public Health Surveillance Methods Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.因 COVID-19 大流行而改变的公共卫生监测方法:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 19;10:e49185. doi: 10.2196/49185.
7
Investigating Citizens' Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy.调查公民对接种追踪应用程序的接受程度:信任和隐私作用的定量研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 18;12:e48700. doi: 10.2196/48700.
8
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Strategies During the First Wave of the Pandemic: Systematic Review of Published Studies.COVID-19 大流行期间的接触者追踪策略:已发表研究的系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 23;9:e42678. doi: 10.2196/42678.
9
A Survey on harnessing the Applications of Mobile Computing in Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Solutions.新冠疫情期间利用移动计算在医疗保健领域应用的调查:挑战与解决方案
Comput Netw. 2023 Apr;224:109605. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109605. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
10
A Study of Users' Privacy Preferences for Data Sharing on Symptoms-Tracking/Health App.一项关于症状追踪/健康应用程序数据共享的用户隐私偏好研究。
Proc ACM Workshop Priv Electron Soc. 2022 Nov;2022:109-113. doi: 10.1145/3559613.3563202. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the effect of exposure notification and non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in Washington state.模拟暴露通知和非药物干预措施对华盛顿州新冠病毒传播的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 12;4(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00422-7.
2
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps: Analysis of the Readability of Privacy Policies.新冠病毒病接触者追踪应用程序:隐私政策可读性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21572. doi: 10.2196/21572.
3
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: Acceptability and Ethical Issues of Use.新冠病毒病接触者追踪技术:使用的可接受性与伦理问题
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 18;14:1639-1647. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S276183. eCollection 2020.
4
Motivations for Social Distancing and App Use as Complementary Measures to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Survey Study.将社交距离和应用程序使用作为对抗新冠疫情补充措施的动机:定量调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e21613. doi: 10.2196/21613.
5
Adoption of a Contact Tracing App for Containing COVID-19: A Health Belief Model Approach.采用接触者追踪应用程序控制 COVID-19:健康信念模型方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 1;6(3):e20572. doi: 10.2196/20572.
6
COVID-19 contact tracing apps: a stress test for privacy, the GDPR, and data protection regimes.新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序:对隐私、《通用数据保护条例》及数据保护制度的压力测试
J Law Biosci. 2020 May 28;7(1):lsaa034. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa034. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
7
Use of apps in the COVID-19 response and the loss of privacy protection.应用程序在应对新冠疫情中的使用与隐私保护的丧失。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1165-1167. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0928-y.

采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:在隐私和效果之间取得平衡。

Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: A Balance Between Privacy and Effectiveness.

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 4;23(3):e25726. doi: 10.2196/25726.

DOI:10.2196/25726
PMID:33617459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935397/
Abstract

With the relative ubiquity of smartphones, contact tracing and exposure notification apps have been looked to as novel methods to help reduce the transmission of COVID-19. Many countries have created apps that lie across a spectrum from privacy-first approaches to those that have very few privacy measures. The level of privacy incorporated into an app is largely based on the societal norms and values of a particular country. Digital health technologies can be highly effective and preserve privacy at the same time, but in the case of contact tracing and exposure notification apps, there is a trade-off between increased privacy measures and the effectiveness of the app. In this article, examples from various countries are used to highlight how characteristics of contract tracing and exposure notification apps contribute to the perceived levels of privacy awarded to citizens and how this impacts an app's effectiveness. We conclude that finding the right balance between privacy and effectiveness, while critical, is challenging because it is highly context-specific.

摘要

随着智能手机的普及,接触者追踪和暴露通知应用程序已被视为帮助降低 COVID-19 传播的新方法。许多国家都开发了各种应用程序,这些应用程序的隐私保护措施从注重隐私的方法到几乎没有隐私措施的方法都有。应用程序中包含的隐私级别在很大程度上基于特定国家的社会规范和价值观。数字健康技术可以非常有效同时保护隐私,但在接触者追踪和暴露通知应用程序的情况下,增加隐私措施和应用程序的有效性之间存在权衡。在本文中,使用来自不同国家的示例来突出显示接触者追踪和暴露通知应用程序的特征如何有助于感知授予公民的隐私级别,以及这如何影响应用程序的有效性。我们的结论是,在隐私和有效性之间找到适当的平衡虽然至关重要,但具有挑战性,因为它高度依赖于具体情况。