Suppr超能文献

印楝叶提取物、蜂胶和橙油作为根管冲洗剂时去除玷污层效果的比较评价:一项扫描电子显微镜研究

Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Neem Leaf Extract, Propolis, and Orange Oil when used as Endodontic Irrigants: An Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

作者信息

Setia Ria, Bajaj Nitika, Bhola Meenu, Brar Gurlal Singh

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Dasmesh Institute of Research and Dental Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):128-134. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_21. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In root canal treatment, chemical debridement of the root canal with the help of irrigants is important due to the complex internal anatomy of the teeth. Biomechanical root canal preparation produces a smear layer. It covers the dentinal tubules, which may interfere with the penetration of various irrigants and intracanal medicaments, so the smear layer has to be removed. The potential side effects and certain limitations of chemical irrigants for smear layer removal have led to a shift toward herbal alternatives.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the smear layer removal efficacy of Neem leaf extract, Propolis, and Orange oil as endodontic irrigants using the scanning electron microscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety samples were taken and then randomly (simple random sampling method) divided into three experimental groups ( = 30) depending upon different endodontic irrigants used: Group 1-Neem leaf extract, Group 2-Orange oil and Group 3-Propolis and smear layer removal evaluation was done under the scanning electron microscope Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at all the levels, i.e., coronal, middle, and apical.

RESULTS

The collected data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) showed the highest smear layer removal efficacy, which was followed by Group 2 (Orange oil) and the least efficacy of smear layer removal was shown by Group 3 (Propolis) at coronal, middle, and apical levels.

CONCLUSION

Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) performed significantly better in removing the smear layer at coronal, middle, and apical levels as compared to the other two groups.

摘要

引言

在根管治疗中,由于牙齿内部解剖结构复杂,借助冲洗剂对根管进行化学清创很重要。根管的生物力学预备会产生玷污层。它覆盖牙本质小管,这可能会干扰各种冲洗剂和根管内药物的渗透,因此必须去除玷污层。用于去除玷污层的化学冲洗剂的潜在副作用和某些局限性已导致向草药替代品的转变。

目的

本研究的目的是使用扫描电子显微镜评估和比较印楝叶提取物、蜂胶和橙油作为根管冲洗剂去除玷污层的效果。

材料与方法

采集90个样本,然后根据所使用的不同根管冲洗剂随机(简单随机抽样法)分为三个实验组(每组n = 30):第1组为印楝叶提取物,第2组为橙油,第3组为蜂胶,并在扫描电子显微镜下在所有水平,即冠部、中部和根尖部进行玷污层去除评估。

结果

使用卡方检验分析收集到的数据。在冠部、中部和根尖部水平,第1组(印楝叶提取物)显示出最高的玷污层去除效果,其次是第2组(橙油),第3组(蜂胶)的玷污层去除效果最差。

结论

与其他两组相比,第1组(印楝叶提取物)在冠部、中部和根尖部水平去除玷污层的表现明显更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验